Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

Long haul business class: Air Canada 787 vs Swiss A330

Long haul business class: Air Canada 787 vs Swiss A330

Old Aug 6, 19, 9:18 pm
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 165
Long haul business class: Air Canada 787 vs Swiss A330

My initial bias was toward Swiss but looking at pictures, AC looks more modern and spacious while Swiss looks more dated and cramped. Can anyone with direct experience speak to this? I also have United 787 as an option but seems clearly inferior to the other two.
acousticbiker is offline  
Old Aug 6, 19, 10:09 pm
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: UA 1K, DL PM
Posts: 4,244
I quite like the AC seat on the 787's but apparently there is quite a serious problem with them now and might better be avoided. I had several really nice flights on them, but that's been 3 or 4 years ago.
Deflategate; new executive pods deflating in-flight

To the other part of your question, I too found the LX seats to be a little cramped but I'd still take them over UA on a 788 or 789. LX's service and food were significantly better than the typical I get on UA. I do assume on LX you're looking at a flight on either the A330 or 777? The A340 has the same seat but I remember the video screens being comically small.
dvs7310 is offline  
Old Aug 7, 19, 12:56 am
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stuck on this planet - mainly in STR and LAX
Posts: 4,542
For me the LX seats are way too narrow. LX has 2+2+1 across in a 777. Other airlines with a similar layout have 1-2-1 (seats are 25 % wider with aisle access from every seat and much bigger box for your feet). I am only familiar with the AC seat on the 777, but my clear preference would be AC for the seat. The :LX food and service might be somewhat better, but for me the seat and the ability to sleep is the most important aspect.
Unterwegs is offline  
Old Aug 7, 19, 6:09 pm
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K MM, Hertz PC, BAEC Silver
Posts: 8,008
I found the AC seats rather uncomfortable - strangely angled with a particularly uncomfortable seat belt. Also, the food is very poor. So my vote would be LX
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Aug 7, 19, 7:40 pm
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K, BA Silver, Accor Plat, Marriott Gold, Carlson Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 20,727
If you can get a seat in row 4/5 - LX. The rest of the cabin is very dorm-like and seats can feel confining.

AC seats may seem better in pictures, but previous posters already mentioned why they should be avoided.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Aug 10, 19, 3:28 pm
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boston MA
Programs: UA 1K/1.5 million miler, SU Gold, JL Sapphire
Posts: 500
For the seat, AC. Yes, despite the deflating thing, because it can be easily remedied.

For the food, I give LX my preference.

This being said, LX seat isn't really bad, not is the food on AC in my opinion. So maybe other factors may be considered here - timings, transfers, etc
skidooman is offline  
Old Aug 14, 19, 2:07 am
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SFO/SJC/OAK
Programs: OZ Diamond (*G), HHonors Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, SkyPesos, AAdvantage, MR
Posts: 1,080
Definitely AC 787, having flown both.

Much better seat hard product wise. The LX seat is pretty narrow and cramped, whereas the AC seat is one of the best in the business.
Soft product is good on both, I would say LX is maybe a little better food&beverage wise, but not enough to sway.
zeer0 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread