Air Canada International Economy vs United Airlines International Economy
If there is a strong desire to fly only Star Alliance airlines, and on that international route there are only two choices, Air Canada or United Airlines, which will be "better" in coach?
|
Originally Posted by reddevil0728
(Post 30027455)
If there is a strong desire to fly only Star Alliance airlines, and on that international route there are only two choices, Air Canada or United Airlines, which will be "better" in coach?
Depending on where you're starting/ending, there's also the issue of transiting another country. It's an added hassle, especially if you're Canada based, because the US transfer is a pita (Canada no picnic either). |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 30027581)
Depends on the aircraft, as they have different seating configurations. In general, AC has high-densified most of its long-haul fleet, whereas UA has only partially done that.
Depending on where you're starting/ending, there's also the issue of transiting another country. It's an added hassle, especially if you're Canada based, because the US transfer is a pita (Canada no picnic either). 787-9 on United Airlines |
Originally Posted by reddevil0728
(Post 30027595)
777-200LR on Air Canada
787-9 on United Airlines Both of these cabins have been densified, though. The United aircraft will perhaps be slightly less bad, with a slightly wider seat and slightly more average pitch. The 789 has the higher cabin pressure (more oxygen, more humidity), which may make it a little more comfortable for a long flight. Neither carrier is known for warm friendly service in economy. You're probably less likely to get an outright rude crew on AC. To me avoiding an extra transit in either the US or Canada would make up for any minor difference in aircraft comfort. |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 30027704)
At least it's not either carrier's 77W (777-300ER). Those are to be avoided at all costs in economy.
Both of these cabins have been densified, though. The United aircraft will perhaps be slightly less bad, with a slightly wider seat and slightly more average pitch. The 789 has the higher cabin pressure (more oxygen, more humidity), which may make it a little more comfortable for a long flight. Neither carrier is known for warm friendly service in economy. You're probably less likely to get an outright rude crew on AC. To me avoiding an extra transit in either the US or Canada would make up for any minor difference in aircraft comfort. |
Originally Posted by reddevil0728
(Post 30027717)
How about in terms of catering?
|
Originally Posted by reddevil0728
(Post 30027595)
777-200LR on Air Canada
787-9 on United Airlines
Originally Posted by reddevil0728
(Post 30027717)
How about in terms of catering?
AC catering is mediocre. I'd say they are equal. Overall though, those are 2 crappy options. Choose whichever gets you there quicker or costs less. |
Red, what is the routing you're looking at? Do you have status on any *A carrier and if so, which one?
|
Originally Posted by catocony
(Post 30046721)
Red, what is the routing you're looking at? Do you have status on any *A carrier and if so, which one?
|
United.
|
Red, you can take Amtrak (train) between Seattle and Vancouver. Crossing the Canadian border to the US in a rental car can be a real pain in the butt, and while it is a short flight, the train ride is about 4 hours, and that's from downtown Vancouver to downtown Seattle. Getting through US preclearance in Vancouver airport adds an hour or so to your day, so it's probably a wash between flying and train.
Fro the flight, Air Canada does have a non-stop to Vancouver. No one has a non-stop to Seattle from Sydney, so you would need to connect in San Francisco or Los Angeles. Not a huge deal, but price each option out. Do not connect in the US to fly to Vancouver, since then you have to go through US Immigration and Customs, then do it again in Canada. |
Originally Posted by catocony
(Post 30048793)
Red, you can take Amtrak (train) between Seattle and Vancouver. Crossing the Canadian border to the US in a rental car can be a real pain in the butt, and while it is a short flight, the train ride is about 4 hours, and that's from downtown Vancouver to downtown Seattle. Getting through US preclearance in Vancouver airport adds an hour or so to your day, so it's probably a wash between flying and train.
Fro the flight, Air Canada does have a non-stop to Vancouver. No one has a non-stop to Seattle from Sydney, so you would need to connect in San Francisco or Los Angeles. Not a huge deal, but price each option out. Do not connect in the US to fly to Vancouver, since then you have to go through US Immigration and Customs, then do it again in Canada. |
Amtrak has a couple of trains between Vancouver and Seattle that do stop in Everett. A car is probably easier in that case however.
|
Originally Posted by catocony
(Post 30048815)
Amtrak has a couple of trains between Vancouver and Seattle that do stop in Everett.
Originally Posted by catocony
(Post 30048793)
Crossing the Canadian border to the US in a rental car can be a real pain in the butt
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:49 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.