*A F award: LAX-HKG-ICN-LAX...

Old May 16, 03, 9:48 pm
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,276
*A F award: LAX-HKG-ICN-LAX...

In another post I asked specifically about TG vs OZ. I may as well spell out my itinerary and ask the sages for advice...

Currently holding the following:

LAX-NRT (NH: F 777)
NRT-HKG (UA: C 744)
HKG-ICN (OZ: F 74M)
ICN-LAD (OZ: F 744)

SQ had nothing available on any transpac flight.

Questions:
Will NH have new F on LAX-NRT by December?
Would it be worth taking NH both ways, rather than OZ one way?
zrs70 is online now  
Old May 17, 03, 5:53 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: UA 1MM, SPG Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 2,796
Looks good to me.
zvezda is offline  
Old May 17, 03, 6:09 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 2,732
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by zrs70:
Will NH have new F on LAX-NRT by December?
Would it be worth taking NH both ways, rather than OZ one way?
</font>
Not knowing whether they will have the new F seats by then, I can though refer you to the comments I received asking about NH F - especially since you wrote elsewhere that sleep is less important than service.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum82/HTML/001468.html
Both reponses but it equal or better than SQ / LH and that must mean something.

Cheers

Thomas
tcswede is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread