If you could move anywhere in the USA...
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Programs: Hertz and Best Western, a free agent in all other respects
Posts: 384
If you could move anywhere in the USA...
And you wanted to fly *A to all regions of the world, where would you move?
Would it make any difference if you planned to do western RTW trips?
Please explain why, in general terms.
TIA
Would it make any difference if you planned to do western RTW trips?
Please explain why, in general terms.
TIA
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Programs: Hertz and Best Western, a free agent in all other respects
Posts: 384
I'll soon be able to work at home full time anywhere on US soil with broadband internet access. Right now, I am much more interested in traveling than I am in all the usual social and cultural activities of youth and growing families.
If renting an apartment near the airport in one city is demonstrably better than any other city, that's what I'd try for a couple years.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
If long haul travel was the only consideration, then Chicago is the best choice. But as others have said, *A is well connected in the USA. Pretty much any US/CO/UA hub with lots of international flights will do: PHL, ORD, SFO, IAD, IAH, EWR, and if you want to suffer one connection, any major city in the contiguous USA will do.
Living in COS, I can get to LAX, IAH, IAD, SFO, ORD in one flight, and only once have I had to deal with two domestic flights to get over a pond. And COS is hardly in a major city.
Living in COS, I can get to LAX, IAH, IAD, SFO, ORD in one flight, and only once have I had to deal with two domestic flights to get over a pond. And COS is hardly in a major city.
Last edited by mre5765; Aug 20, 2011 at 8:11 pm
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Programs: Hertz and Best Western, a free agent in all other respects
Posts: 384
If long haul travel was the only consideration, then Chicago is the best choice. But as others have said, *A is well connected in the USA. Pretty much any US/CO/UA hub with lots of international flights will do: PHL, ORD, SFO, IAD, IAH, EWR, and if you want to suffer one connection, any major city in the contiguous USA will do.
Living in COS, I can get to LAX, IAH, IAD, SFO, ORD in one flight, and only once have I had to deal with two domestic flights to get over a pond. And COS is hardly in a major city.
Living in COS, I can get to LAX, IAH, IAD, SFO, ORD in one flight, and only once have I had to deal with two domestic flights to get over a pond. And COS is hardly in a major city.
Staying off regional jets is a big part of my thinking. And I like the windy city.
#6
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
It's really too hard to answer this question. Assuming you have no interest in the city you live in, a major hub would be best. If I was living in the airport and oblivious to the town it was in, I'd pick ORD. You can get anywhere from there.
Given that you are renting and only want to travel, why not pick more than one place? Live for a while in NY and fly TATL. Then live near LAX/SFO and fly TPAC. If you are going to RTW, then it really doesn't matter. You leave anywhere, travel your brains out, and return anywhere. It really doesn't matter for cost or convenience.
If it we're me and traveling is far more important (but not the only consideration), I'd pick a city that I most wanted to live in, even if I lived in a cheap rental near the airport. As MRE suggested, COS is a pretty nice place. DEN would be great too. Either is easy to travel from.
Given that you are renting and only want to travel, why not pick more than one place? Live for a while in NY and fly TATL. Then live near LAX/SFO and fly TPAC. If you are going to RTW, then it really doesn't matter. You leave anywhere, travel your brains out, and return anywhere. It really doesn't matter for cost or convenience.
If it we're me and traveling is far more important (but not the only consideration), I'd pick a city that I most wanted to live in, even if I lived in a cheap rental near the airport. As MRE suggested, COS is a pretty nice place. DEN would be great too. Either is easy to travel from.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Programs: Hertz and Best Western, a free agent in all other respects
Posts: 384
Cost of living is certainly a factor. I need to adjust to Continental being part of United (my bias/problem).
I assume CO as a favorite place to live means Colorado, not Continental, LOL.
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Programs: Hertz and Best Western, a free agent in all other respects
Posts: 384
It's really too hard to answer this question. Assuming you have no interest in the city you live in, a major hub would be best. If I was living in the airport and oblivious to the town it was in, I'd pick ORD. You can get anywhere from there.
Given that you are renting and only want to travel, why not pick more than one place? Live for a while in NY and fly TATL. Then live near LAX/SFO and fly TPAC. If you are going to RTW, then it really doesn't matter. You leave anywhere, travel your brains out, and return anywhere. It really doesn't matter for cost or convenience.
If it we're me and traveling is far more important (but not the only consideration), I'd pick a city that I most wanted to live in, even if I lived in a cheap rental near the airport. As MRE suggested, COS is a pretty nice place. DEN would be great too. Either is easy to travel from.
Given that you are renting and only want to travel, why not pick more than one place? Live for a while in NY and fly TATL. Then live near LAX/SFO and fly TPAC. If you are going to RTW, then it really doesn't matter. You leave anywhere, travel your brains out, and return anywhere. It really doesn't matter for cost or convenience.
If it we're me and traveling is far more important (but not the only consideration), I'd pick a city that I most wanted to live in, even if I lived in a cheap rental near the airport. As MRE suggested, COS is a pretty nice place. DEN would be great too. Either is easy to travel from.
There's not much question that a hub is the only answer, ORD seems like it, even with the WX.
I thought about a suite at the Dulles Marriott or the like, but I can't shed every last thing I own, so need some place to come back to.
I did a DEN-ABQ leg on UAX last year, Christ, I never walked so far in one airport than mainline UA to UAX at DEN. It was a rare day when my lower back was giving me trouble, and I wasn't sure I could even do it. No UAX for me, at least at DEN.
#12
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stuck on this planet - mainly in STR and LAX
Posts: 5,019
What about SFO. First it is a pretty nice city. Public transportation to the airport (you can live anywhere, not necessarily close to the airport). Weather is usually nice, not many delays in winter.
When you start traveling internationally and on RTWs you have some good airlines flying from there to Asia, LX and LH to Europe (in addition to United).
Travel to South America would require connections, but you could do the occasional OW RTW and use LAN. Cathay and JAL to Asia, BA to Europe.
When you start traveling internationally and on RTWs you have some good airlines flying from there to Asia, LX and LH to Europe (in addition to United).
Travel to South America would require connections, but you could do the occasional OW RTW and use LAN. Cathay and JAL to Asia, BA to Europe.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC|NYC
Programs: UA GS, DL Plat, Marriott Bonvoy LIfetime Titanium/SPG refugee, Hertz Prez, Amtrak Select
Posts: 3,201
I'd pass on CLT then if you don't like long mainline-->express gate walks, esp. when there's no club near the express gates.