![]() |
RTW ?: Surface sector as stopover
The TOC for RTW state on *A site: Surface (Non-Air) sectors of your journey Since there are few *A flights intra Australia (isn't UA SYD-MEL the only one - which requires arriving/departing US on UA?), if I arrive Perth and leave from Sydney within 3 days (using a surface sector paid for out of my pocket), is this one or two stopovers?
Spoiler: According to LH this is one stopover. I recognize most FT'ers would prefer this. On this trip, I prefer the other outcome. Any thoughts; other experiences? PS: This would be moot if *A would get some coverage in Australia :( |
It's 1 stop.
If you buy the RTW starting in SYD ending in PER or vice versa, then the miles between SYD and PER are not counted - liberates more miles for the actual RTW -and it's not a stop. So if you're struggling to make the minimum 3 stops, why not just buy a 1-way to Aus and start your RTW here? |
Originally Posted by #10
...if I arrive Perth and leave from Sydney within 3 days (using a surface sector paid for out of my pocket), is this one or two stopovers?
For example, if you had an itinerary like this ...-SIN-PER//SYD-AKL-syd-LAX-... then the second time through SYD you could transit only, i.e., you would have to connect in less than 24 hours. cheers, Henry |
However, you are only allowed 16 segments anyway. So why care about whether it is a stopover or a transfer? :confused:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.