Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Southwest Airlines | Rapid Rewards
Reload this Page >

Massive SNA (Orange County) Capacity Loss until 12/31

Massive SNA (Orange County) Capacity Loss until 12/31

Old Sep 13, 23, 6:12 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: Hilton Diamond
Posts: 83
Massive SNA (Orange County) Capacity Loss until 12/31

FYI from a friend...
"In an effort to balance the needs of the Orange County community for adequate commercial air transportation facilities and the desire of the local community for environmentally responsible air transportation operations, SNA is requiring all airlines to reduce capacity on flights traveling to/from the airport through the end of the year. As a result, Revenue Management has lowered the lids on our SNA flights operating between September 9 and December 21, 2023. This will not impact existing reservations. Employees should not overbook any SNA flights through December 31, 2023."

These are loads from LAS/SNA on 9/15, you can see some flights are down ton 79,93,107 etc.... no reason why some flights are lower than others.

Mcdonoughdr is offline  
Old Sep 13, 23, 9:31 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: Bonvoy LTTE/AMB, AmEx Plat, National EE, WN A+, CLEAR, Covid-19
Posts: 4,916
😮😮😢😢😡
Attached Images  
kennycrudup is online now  
Old Sep 13, 23, 9:37 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: Bonvoy LTTE/AMB, AmEx Plat, National EE, WN A+, CLEAR, Covid-19
Posts: 4,916
Originally Posted by Mcdonoughdr
environmentally responsible air transportation operations, SNA is requiring all airlines to reduce capacity on flights traveling to/from the airport
So, help me understand- the number of flights is(?) unchanged, but with fewer people on them and that's somehow "environmentally responsible"? Wouldn't the c-rb-n "average per pax" be higher now?
wrp96 likes this.
kennycrudup is online now  
Old Sep 14, 23, 3:25 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 248
Originally Posted by kennycrudup
So, help me understand- the number of flights is(?) unchanged, but with fewer people on them and that's somehow "environmentally responsible"? Wouldn't the c-rb-n "average per pax" be higher now?
California math
kennycrudup, Kevin AA and m907 like this.
ToSRQ is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 6:38 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 10,962
I am very confused.

They talk about reduction, but no flights are cancelled.

Anyone know what the column headings are in the first post?
joshua362 likes this.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 8:58 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,428
The airport guesses how full flights will be, and applies that percentage to back into the current 11.8 million allowable passengers. And that determines how many flights they’ll permit.
View From the Wing


Short-haul 737 noise limits differ from long-haul ones. (Or so they try to explain.)

For short-haul destinations (e.g. S.F. Bay Area and Las Vegas) an aircraft can operate within the Class E noise limits; however, for long-haul destinations (e.g. Atlanta and Newark) the same aircraft might need to operate as a Class A. NOTE: The number of Class A average daily departures is limited by the Settlement Agreement to eighty-nine (89).
JWA Access & Noise FAQs
NoStressHere likes this.
LegalTender is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 11:43 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: Cowtool $ contributor, AC SE100K, WN CP, F9 50k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,026
Originally Posted by NoStressHere
I am very confused.

They talk about reduction, but no flights are cancelled.
same here. one would think even if airport was slot-controlled they would encourage cancelling / combining flights.

or require airlines to do so, planning out thru year end at prior quarter's passenger load %. half empty planes aren't much quieter
​​​

​​​​​​
​​​​​
expert7700 is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 12:41 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 10,962
Bureaucrats at work here.

Environmental person says : "Gee, we need to reduce the overall traffic at our airport. If we reduce the number of passengers, we are all set."

Guy in back of room jumps up and says - "We need to reduce number of flights."

Accountant jumps up and says - "No, we can not do that. It would reduce the income we get from airlines for landing rights and it will mess up the budget"

Guy in back of room gets fired.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 2:46 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: US
Programs: (PM)AA SPG (Marriott), Hilton
Posts: 1,040
If you wander over to the SNA Airport board minutes, somewhere starting here, https://www.ocair.com/about/administ...rt-commission/ The report the exact passenger numbers planned, or rather, approved.

The DRAFT 2024 Plan is here: https://files.ocair.com/media/2023-0...MEaPe7.Zk1FIfK Under the July 5, 2023 minutes. If the direct PDF link fails, here's the parent link: https://www.ocair.com/about/administ...n/july-5-2023/

Southwest is down for 4.4M of the 14M seat capacity American is #2 at 2.4M, United #3 at 2M, Alaska #4 at 2M just behind United and Delta at 1.3M The actual limit is 11.8M, but they allow for empty seats.

Somewhere else I ran across a comment that 2020 and/or 2021 when travel was restricted they were around 8M actual, and the cutback to WN may be related to that pent-up travel demand everyone has mentioned.

Originally Posted by LegalTender
The airport guesses how full flights will be, and applies that percentage to back into the current 11.8 million allowable passengers. And that determines how many flights theyll permit.
They aren't guessing.

In another set of minutes, which I didn't save the link for, they had a June YTD set of numbers reported from the airlines. I can't find it right now


Environmental? Less seats = less fuel? Less passengers = less times the toilet is flushed at the airport? Less individual cars picking up passengers? Somewhere back in time will be the document that created the 11.8 limit, and it may explain what they were thinking.
Out of my Element likes this.
reft is offline  
Old Sep 14, 23, 4:22 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,646
I spent a week in the congested, trafficked surrounding area and jogged around SNA daily. The quest for noise abatement must be about the luxury homes and apartments on the water of Newport Beach. I hope the banana stand isn't impacted...
joshua362 is online now  
Old Sep 14, 23, 4:27 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Coast
Programs: WN A+, AS MVP, UA 1P
Posts: 86
There's always money in the banana stand!

CA1900 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 23, 10:21 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: Bonvoy LTTE/AMB, AmEx Plat, National EE, WN A+, CLEAR, Covid-19
Posts: 4,916
Originally Posted by joshua362
The quest for noise abatement must be about the luxury homes and apartments on the water of Newport Beach.
Yup- sometimes during the (Fast-and-Furious) takeoff climb, sometimes the FAs will get on the PA and whisper "Shhhh ... we're flying over rich people!"

But what really makes no sense is quite a few people moved there long after SNA went big-time and still complain about the airport 🙄
joshua362, jjbiv, jmw and 5 others like this.
kennycrudup is online now  
Old Sep 15, 23, 11:25 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: US
Programs: (PM)AA SPG (Marriott), Hilton
Posts: 1,040
Originally Posted by kennycrudup
But what really makes no sense is quite a few people moved there long after SNA went big-time and still complain about the airport 🙄
Time honored tradition.

The novel "Airport" had a chunk of it dedicated to neighborhood airport noise protesters. Took the protesters to task over it and blamed sleezy realtors who sold them the land, full knowing the 'jetport' was coming.
This was reduced to a scene and a few lines in the movie.
JAXPax and flg8rmatt like this.
reft is offline  
Old Sep 19, 23, 4:44 pm
  #14  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,505
Originally Posted by kennycrudup
Yup- sometimes during the (Fast-and-Furious) takeoff climb, sometimes the FAs will get on the PA and whisper "Shhhh ... we're flying over rich people!"
Yes. In the Elmer Fudd voice: "Sshhh... Be vewy vewy quiet..we're flying over wich people."
nsx is offline  
Old Sep 19, 23, 7:33 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN USA
Posts: 2,059
Originally Posted by reft
If you wander over to the SNA Airport board minutes.....
Appreciate you looking up some source docs.
jjbiv, kennycrudup and reft like this.
bowdenj is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.