Southwest uses the same new Boeing plane in Indonesia crash
#211
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PIT, BWI, or IPT
Programs: Dividend Miles, WorldPerks
Posts: 1,302
The most unsafe commercial aircraft was Concorde, with 11 fatal flights per million flights
Second place is 737max with 4 fatal flights per million flights. (2 fatal flights in 500K flights so far)
The prior 737 has just 0.2 fatal flights per million.
If you flew 737max very frequently, but not as frequently as driving... say 5 round trips (10 flights) a week for 35 years, you have a 7.28% chance of dying during your lifetime flying this bird (1 in 250K odds). Your chances of dying from a car crash is about 1% during your lifetime. Your chances of dying as a passenger in a car crash is 0.17% (1 in 572).
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-b...203441321.html
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/f...mortality-risk
No thank you, Southwest. I'll ride the bus if necessary.
Second place is 737max with 4 fatal flights per million flights. (2 fatal flights in 500K flights so far)
The prior 737 has just 0.2 fatal flights per million.
If you flew 737max very frequently, but not as frequently as driving... say 5 round trips (10 flights) a week for 35 years, you have a 7.28% chance of dying during your lifetime flying this bird (1 in 250K odds). Your chances of dying from a car crash is about 1% during your lifetime. Your chances of dying as a passenger in a car crash is 0.17% (1 in 572).
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-b...203441321.html
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/f...mortality-risk
No thank you, Southwest. I'll ride the bus if necessary.
Have fun on the bus! (And all of those terrible bus crashes that I see in the news...it is a rough world out there).
#212
Join Date: May 2018
Location: SJC
Posts: 64
The wing tips are another way to tell. All MAX's have a winglet that points both up and down. Older aircraft have a winglet that only turns up - but be aware, there are or will be MAX style retrofits available.
#213
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, US
Posts: 2,210
Here's an article from 2014 announcing adding them to a bunch to 800s (predating the delivery of any MAX's):
https://worldairlinenews.com/2014/01...eing-737-800s/
#214
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,870
This is not correct and is an unreliable way to determine a/c type.
#215
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,399
Don't you mean "until you land at your destination"? Planes have been boarded and then deboarded at the gate for aircraft swaps, flights are diverted, people get VDBs/IDBs, etc.
#216
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,399
No one is forcing you unless you're being deported or extradited. Just say no, even at the gate or after boarding.
#217
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,870
#218
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,689
#219
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,720
Given the frequency of WN flights on many major routes, is easy enough to avoid the MAX unless you get a last minute equipment swap.
Personally I've done a complete 180 after the second crash. I think it is worth it to avoid a 1/250,000 chance of premature death but YMMV and admittedly them odds are pretty low... Consider also we don't know how many other misses or near misses have not been widely reported because the pilots managed to disengage the software (assuming that was the cause). I certainly would not choose to drive (where your chance of death is immensely higher) but I do have a choice of airlines and flights and WN often isn't even the lowest priced. It is for the same reason I stick to first world airlines if at all possible. The odds are just significantly better.
Personally I've done a complete 180 after the second crash. I think it is worth it to avoid a 1/250,000 chance of premature death but YMMV and admittedly them odds are pretty low... Consider also we don't know how many other misses or near misses have not been widely reported because the pilots managed to disengage the software (assuming that was the cause). I certainly would not choose to drive (where your chance of death is immensely higher) but I do have a choice of airlines and flights and WN often isn't even the lowest priced. It is for the same reason I stick to first world airlines if at all possible. The odds are just significantly better.
Last edited by Boraxo; Mar 13, 2019 at 12:41 am
#220
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: UA GOLD MM,WN CP A+list, HH Gold,MR LT Titanium
Posts: 2,184
Given the frequency of WN flights on many major routes, is easy enough to avoid the MAX unless you get a last minute equipment swap.
Personally I've done a complete 180 after the second crash. I think it is worth it to avoid a 1/250,000 chance of premature death but YMMV and admittedly them odds are pretty low... Consider also we don't know how many other misses or near misses have not been widely reported because the pilots managed to disengage the software (assuming that was the cause). I certainly would not choose to drive (where your chance of death is immensely higher) but I do have a choice of airlines and flights and WN often isn't even the lowest priced. It is for the same reason I stick to first world airlines if at all possible. The odds are just significantly better.
Personally I've done a complete 180 after the second crash. I think it is worth it to avoid a 1/250,000 chance of premature death but YMMV and admittedly them odds are pretty low... Consider also we don't know how many other misses or near misses have not been widely reported because the pilots managed to disengage the software (assuming that was the cause). I certainly would not choose to drive (where your chance of death is immensely higher) but I do have a choice of airlines and flights and WN often isn't even the lowest priced. It is for the same reason I stick to first world airlines if at all possible. The odds are just significantly better.
My reasons were more operational in nature. Over the last few weeks, I have had significant mechanical delays of anywhere between 3-6 hours on WN. I cannot trust that this issue with MAX isn't going to create an even bigger mess,especially if they end up grounded.
#221
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta PlM, 1M
Posts: 6,363
... Personally I've done a complete 180 after the second crash. I think it is worth it to avoid a 1/250,000 chance of premature death but YMMV and admittedly them odds are pretty low... Consider also we don't know how many other misses or near misses have not been widely reported because the pilots managed to disengage the software (assuming that was the cause). I certainly would not choose to drive (where your chance of death is immensely higher) but I do have a choice of airlines and flights and WN often isn't even the lowest priced. It is for the same reason I stick to first world airlines if at all possible. The odds are just significantly better.
The MAX has flown under 20,000 flights, so the odds would around 1/10,000 per flight if the crashes represent the real risk.
Last edited by exwannabe; Mar 13, 2019 at 9:58 am
#222
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 33
Canada bans MAX 8 & 9 from airspace
#225
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 76
Now that even Canada has grounded the Max, the pressure will really mount on the FAA or airlines to ground it, My buddy who works at MDW said that everyone is flipping out saying they won’t fly on the Max and that they have to reassure passengers that it will be safe.