Gay couple accused WN of discrimination
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,752
Gay couple accused WN of discrimination
Disclosure - I post this as a gay activist...
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/35489643/...discrimination
Perhaps poor reporting, but 1,000,000 ANNUAL miles on WN?
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/35489643/...discrimination
Perhaps poor reporting, but 1,000,000 ANNUAL miles on WN?
#3
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
Sounds like the Family Boarding rules were selectively enforced upon them and they feel it was because they are gay parents.
Not being there and witnessing what happened, it's impossible to know the truth.
Based on what we do know from the various reports, it's difficult to side with either the parents or the ops agent.
I do find Southwest's official statement to be trite and tone deaf, and consider that a mistake.
Not being there and witnessing what happened, it's impossible to know the truth.
Based on what we do know from the various reports, it's difficult to side with either the parents or the ops agent.
I do find Southwest's official statement to be trite and tone deaf, and consider that a mistake.
#4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Peoria
Programs: Southwest, Best Western Gold, La Quinta, Dollar
Posts: 819
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/35489643/...discrimination
Some nasty posts in the comments section there...
Some nasty posts in the comments section there...
#5
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
“This conversation in the boarding area had nothing to do with discrimination, we welcomed both parents to board the aircraft with their children,” the airline said in a statement. “The parents expressed disappointment that the Family Boarding policy was not applicable to another member of their group."
Sounds to me like the airline thinks the parents wanted to add another (presumably adult) person to their boarding group. And if that is the case I'd have to say it was the parents in the wrong.
Sounds to me like the airline thinks the parents wanted to add another (presumably adult) person to their boarding group. And if that is the case I'd have to say it was the parents in the wrong.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,733
The story I saw on Facebook also said that Southwest forced their disabled mother in law to sit in an exit row and wouldn't let her move. It kind of felt like a throw everything at the airline complaint and see if something sticks.
I don't know that it was discrimination rather than just simple bad handling by the agent of confusion over what constitutes family boarding.
I don't know that it was discrimination rather than just simple bad handling by the agent of confusion over what constitutes family boarding.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
#8
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Evergreen Park, IL
Posts: 1,384
The story I saw on Facebook also said that Southwest forced their disabled mother in law to sit in an exit row and wouldn't let her move. It kind of felt like a throw everything at the airline complaint and see if something sticks.
I don't know that it was discrimination rather than just simple bad handling by the agent of confusion over what constitutes family boarding.
I don't know that it was discrimination rather than just simple bad handling by the agent of confusion over what constitutes family boarding.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,733
#10
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
Thoughts:
The 83 year old mother in law was likely qualified to preboard, but if one parent accompanied her that would leave the other father to contend alone with three kids, two in strollers. So they decided to board all together during Family Boarding.
I've personally seen Family Boarding include multi-generational families, many times. I've also seen reports on social media of grandparents being stopped. The stated policy is (likely intentionally) vague -- it can be interpreted to mean one adult per family (almost never enforced), or one adult per child.
They had three children, and three adults. If they had presented as three sets of child/adult, would they have been challenged?
Ultimately, the problem stems from WN's vague policy and inconsistent policy enforcement.
The 83 year old mother in law was likely qualified to preboard, but if one parent accompanied her that would leave the other father to contend alone with three kids, two in strollers. So they decided to board all together during Family Boarding.
I've personally seen Family Boarding include multi-generational families, many times. I've also seen reports on social media of grandparents being stopped. The stated policy is (likely intentionally) vague -- it can be interpreted to mean one adult per family (almost never enforced), or one adult per child.
They had three children, and three adults. If they had presented as three sets of child/adult, would they have been challenged?
Ultimately, the problem stems from WN's vague policy and inconsistent policy enforcement.
#11
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
They were held by the Ops Agent and were the last people to board the plane. The FAs, knowing of the situation, tried to save seats for them. One of those seats -- the last remaining one on the plane per the family's report -- was in the exit row, and the FAs sat the 83-year old grandmother there. The family called her "frail," but there is no evidence that she was disabled. Presumably she was able to answer the exit row qualification question affirmatively, although it's possible she was never asked.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,733
They were held by the Ops Agent and were the last people to board the plane. The FAs, knowing of the situation, tried to save seats for them. One of those seats -- the last remaining one on the plane per the family's report -- was in the exit row, and the FAs sat the 83-year old grandmother there. The family called her "frail," but there is no evidence that she was disabled. Presumably she was able to answer the exit row qualification question affirmatively, although it's possible she was never asked.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SLC
Programs: DL PM, Hilton/Marriott Gold
Posts: 971
They were held by the Ops Agent and were the last people to board the plane. The FAs, knowing of the situation, tried to save seats for them. One of those seats -- the last remaining one on the plane per the family's report -- was in the exit row, and the FAs sat the 83-year old grandmother there. The family called her "frail," but there is no evidence that she was disabled. Presumably she was able to answer the exit row qualification question affirmatively, although it's possible she was never asked.
Is there some clickbait article listing "10 reasons why you should NEVER sit in the exit row" making the rounds on facebook or something?
#14
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
I frequently see an exit row seat being one of the last taken. One possible reason is that an FA generally stands in that row during boarding, and many passengers (especially on "pleasure" routes, not savvy enough to realize they can ask the FA to move) just pass it by.
My favorite "win" is an exit row with an empty middle. On a non-full flight that happens more than one might expect.
My favorite "win" is an exit row with an empty middle. On a non-full flight that happens more than one might expect.
#15
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,698
I frequently see an exit row seat being one of the last taken. One possible reason is that an FA generally stands in that row during boarding, and many passengers (especially on "pleasure" routes, not savvy enough to realize they can ask the FA to move) just pass it by.
My favorite "win" is an exit row with an empty middle. On a non-full flight that happens more than one might expect.
My favorite "win" is an exit row with an empty middle. On a non-full flight that happens more than one might expect.
There is absolutely nothing special about the aisle or middle seat next to the infinite legroom seat other than being closer to the exit!