Bay Area to Toronto via WN Q3?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SJC, Northern Cal.
Programs: SWA RR BIS 6.2M, A+'20, CP'20, AA, UA Gold, Hertz PC, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 909
Bay Area to Toronto via WN Q3?
I don't see an easy/direct way at the present time to do it but if one wanted to how would one fly from OAK, SFO, or SJC (Preferred) to Toronto via WN?
Any one hear of anything opening up by early September?
Any one hear of anything opening up by early September?
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
OP is probably better off just flying SFO/YYZ direct on Air Canada. Not sure what porter's fares are from MDW, but to fly to YYZ on AC or Delta from DTW or on Porter from Windsor is absurd. You are lucky to get that fare for $800 now. Would probably be cheaper and the OP won't have to deal with claiming bags and rechecking them and reclearing security.
#5
Moderator, Southwest Airlines and Choice Privileges
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,036
Highly unlikely, I'd say. When WN finally figures out how to do international, they'll almost surely start by converting AirTran stations.
As long as you aren't talking the first three days of September, RT fares on MegaBus are mostly under $20/person. If the second week of September, it could be as low as $2.50/person if booked soon. More like $80/person for the holiday weekend, though.
Unlike in most MegaBus cities, there is a stop in Buffalo at the airport itself. Thus if you are going to downtown Toronto anyway, the bus is a great option. If not, and/or if you need a car anyway, renting in Buffalo may be the way to go. It is only about a two-hour drive (but allow for border delays, which of course you'll have at some point anyway).
Unlike in most MegaBus cities, there is a stop in Buffalo at the airport itself. Thus if you are going to downtown Toronto anyway, the bus is a great option. If not, and/or if you need a car anyway, renting in Buffalo may be the way to go. It is only about a two-hour drive (but allow for border delays, which of course you'll have at some point anyway).
#6
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,682
BUF-Toronto is an easy drive, avoids lots of immigration hassles and fees, and also Niagara Falls is right on the way. I think it can be done in 90 minutes easy. Toronto airport to downtown is probably 30 minutes so the difference is only like 60 minutes.
#7
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
I would think that any announcement about going into Canada would have a longer lead time than 2 months. It doesn't seem like it's in the cards anyway.
BUF is a good option for Toronto. As long as WN has a pretty straightfoward one-stop itin to BUF, do that plus a rental car. If it's a convoluted path to BUF, I'd probably just buy SFO-YYZ on AC. At some point, the time invested getting from BUF to YYZ kills off any value you get out of a lower fare. Is it just you flying or several people?
We've used Southwest for Vancouver and Toronto trips before, but always with a carload of people. When you're talking a total of $1000+ in savings across 3 or 4 airfares, driving 2-3 hours each way starts to sound a little better.
BUF is a good option for Toronto. As long as WN has a pretty straightfoward one-stop itin to BUF, do that plus a rental car. If it's a convoluted path to BUF, I'd probably just buy SFO-YYZ on AC. At some point, the time invested getting from BUF to YYZ kills off any value you get out of a lower fare. Is it just you flying or several people?
We've used Southwest for Vancouver and Toronto trips before, but always with a carload of people. When you're talking a total of $1000+ in savings across 3 or 4 airfares, driving 2-3 hours each way starts to sound a little better.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SJC, Northern Cal.
Programs: SWA RR BIS 6.2M, A+'20, CP'20, AA, UA Gold, Hertz PC, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 909
I would think that any announcement about going into Canada would have a longer lead time than 2 months. It doesn't seem like it's in the cards anyway.
BUF is a good option for Toronto. As long as WN has a pretty straightfoward one-stop itin to BUF, do that plus a rental car. If it's a convoluted path to BUF, I'd probably just buy SFO-YYZ on AC. At some point, the time invested getting from BUF to YYZ kills off any value you get out of a lower fare. Is it just you flying or several people?
We've used Southwest for Vancouver and Toronto trips before, but always with a carload of people. When you're talking a total of $1000+ in savings across 3 or 4 airfares, driving 2-3 hours each way starts to sound a little better.
BUF is a good option for Toronto. As long as WN has a pretty straightfoward one-stop itin to BUF, do that plus a rental car. If it's a convoluted path to BUF, I'd probably just buy SFO-YYZ on AC. At some point, the time invested getting from BUF to YYZ kills off any value you get out of a lower fare. Is it just you flying or several people?
We've used Southwest for Vancouver and Toronto trips before, but always with a carload of people. When you're talking a total of $1000+ in savings across 3 or 4 airfares, driving 2-3 hours each way starts to sound a little better.
#9
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left
Programs: FT
Posts: 7,285
as to more hassles, i think it is pretty much even in terms of those.
even with my nexus card, from BUF to the centre of YYZ is 1:25 minutes and I do this drive ALL the time. factor in time to get a rental car etc., OP is saving some time...
#10
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left
Programs: FT
Posts: 7,285
bay area to YYZ is not ideal on AA. you can have non stop on AA from LAX. [non-stops to LAX on AA are almost always 738s as I recall]
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
Through ORD on a 738 or through JFK on a 762 are the two most logical routings. Also a couple SJC-ORD options on a 738. (The short segment into YYZ will inevitably be on a small plane.) For a solo business trip, I'd probably go that route vs. a BUF fly/drive route.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
if there are no border lines and depending on traffic and time of day...and that is a very big if. now if OP has a nexus card, i would agree with your statements.
as to more hassles, i think it is pretty much even in terms of those.
even with my nexus card, from BUF to the centre of YYZ is 1:25 minutes and I do this drive ALL the time. factor in time to get a rental car etc., OP is saving some time...
as to more hassles, i think it is pretty much even in terms of those.
even with my nexus card, from BUF to the centre of YYZ is 1:25 minutes and I do this drive ALL the time. factor in time to get a rental car etc., OP is saving some time...
Not to mention the extra time. If I am flying that far last thing I want to do is drive another 90 minutes. And IME, it can take a lot longer to cross at a land border crossing than at the airport (but my only experience has been at the windsor/DTW crossings).
If OP doesn't need a rental car, I would just fly on another airline non-stop to YYZ and take a cab or shuttle (or if the OP doesn't have a lot of luggage rocket is always a very cheap alternative to getting into the city as well). Flying in ALB and taking Mega or into MDW and taking porter would be too risky for me. If there is a problem with the flight they miss their porter or mega bus they could be screwed. If they are on time, there is extra time to kill, etc.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
-YYZ is an expensive airport to operate from. VX came and went, partly because the operational break even would always be higher than the border US airports based on the user tax in Canada. For leisure pax, the extra time to cross into BUF was offset by the significant tax differences.