WN Adding 4 Seats to the -300 and -700?
Aug 23, 2011, 11:05 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: Deciding Which Airline to Fly in 2012
Posts: 420
WN Adding 4 Seats to the -300 and -700?
Rumor on a.net that Gary and co. are considering 4 additional seats for the 733 and 737s by adding a row on one side and a chair next to the love seat.
Aug 24, 2011, 9:02 am
#2
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: WN CP
Posts: 6,360
Aug 24, 2011, 9:15 am
#3
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston (HOU/IAH)
Programs: WN, UA, DL, AA, Chase UR, Amex MR
Posts: 2,267
I'm okay with it as long as the pitch stays relatively unchanged and the seats don't end up feeling like lawn chairs.
They are playing with fire if they reduce leg room or seat comfort.
They are playing with fire if they reduce leg room or seat comfort.
Aug 24, 2011, 9:43 am
#4
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Night Vale
Posts: 1,872
This is the way I heard the rumor a while back:
A 700 in Dallas was refurbed with the new interior like will come on the 800's.
Feeling of more space, leg room the same even with the extra row. Less recline and the seat sits lower so more headroom. Seat pocket is netting.
Carpet will be carpet squares. Big dogs gave the plan a thumbs up and this was before they were told about the extra row. If this goes ahead, the retrofit would only apply to the 700's.
What is unclear is how many years it will take for IT to get set up for the 7 extra seats.
A 700 in Dallas was refurbed with the new interior like will come on the 800's.
Feeling of more space, leg room the same even with the extra row. Less recline and the seat sits lower so more headroom. Seat pocket is netting.
Carpet will be carpet squares. Big dogs gave the plan a thumbs up and this was before they were told about the extra row. If this goes ahead, the retrofit would only apply to the 700's.
What is unclear is how many years it will take for IT to get set up for the 7 extra seats.
Aug 24, 2011, 9:52 am
#5
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,617
If the seat is lower and the pitch is the same, legroom is reduced. In case this is not clear, consider how much pitch you would need with the seat on the floor vs. with a mini-seat 3 feet off the floor.
Aug 24, 2011, 10:42 am
#6
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,290
One obvious calculation (which everyone has probably already made) - if seat pitch is about 30" and you have 23 rows, then if you add an extra row, you will need to subtract a little over 1" of seat pitch per row - that is, unless you make some other adjustment, such as making the seat backs thinner.
Aug 24, 2011, 10:55 am
#7
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MDW
Programs: WN CP & A-List Pref, HH Gold, Marriott LT PP
Posts: 708
I was on the Oshkosh ferry flight with mostly WN employees and pilots. I overheard two pilots in the row behind me talking about the -800 seating configurations. They metioned that the new WN -800s will have a configuration consisting of 175 seats.
On a side note, I also overheard discussions that Hawaii is in the process of being added to the route map beginning in 2013.
Take these statements for what they are worth, simply conversations I overheard.
On a side note, I also overheard discussions that Hawaii is in the process of being added to the route map beginning in 2013.
Take these statements for what they are worth, simply conversations I overheard.
Aug 24, 2011, 11:12 am
#8
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston (HOU/IAH)
Programs: WN, UA, DL, AA, Chase UR, Amex MR
Posts: 2,267
One obvious calculation (which everyone has probably already made) - if seat pitch is about 30" and you have 23 rows, then if you add an extra row, you will need to subtract a little over 1" of seat pitch per row - that is, unless you make some other adjustment, such as making the seat backs thinner.
Aug 24, 2011, 11:27 am
#9
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hollywood, California, USA
Programs: WN Companion Pass, former HP Gold and AA Gold
Posts: 269
Aug 24, 2011, 1:27 pm
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
One obvious calculation (which everyone has probably already made) - if seat pitch is about 30" and you have 23 rows, then if you add an extra row, you will need to subtract a little over 1" of seat pitch per row - that is, unless you make some other adjustment, such as making the seat backs thinner.
Aug 24, 2011, 1:30 pm
#11
Moderator, Southwest Airlines and Choice Privileges
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,036
Could be famous last words, but this shouldn't be an IT hurdle. They already handle 122 and 137 seat configurations, and soon will handle the larger capacity of the -800.
I wonder about the transition. How many months does it take to convert the fleet? At what point in the process do they start selling the additional seats in advance, beginning, middle, or end? If they don't sell them until all planes are converted, clearing standbys will temporarily be much easier.
On a different note: will the FA contract have to be renegotiated again?
I wonder about the transition. How many months does it take to convert the fleet? At what point in the process do they start selling the additional seats in advance, beginning, middle, or end? If they don't sell them until all planes are converted, clearing standbys will temporarily be much easier.
On a different note: will the FA contract have to be renegotiated again?
Last edited by ftnoob; Aug 24, 2011 at 2:34 pm Reason: typo
Aug 24, 2011, 7:48 pm
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,502
This will make me very unhappy. I refuse to fly AA's 737-800s because of their "nifty" seats. My mom has just started flying Southwest because of that, because she needs a completely level flat seat bottom for some back/disc issues.
Aug 24, 2011, 10:44 pm
#14
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,187
I also believe the "green" trial of thinner padded seats stuck. I observed them being approx an inch thinner, so you're sitting that much lower to the floor on many -700's
Aug 24, 2011, 11:17 pm
#15
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: OAK/SFO/SJC
Programs: AA Plat 2MM+, HHonors, Amtrak GuestRewards
Posts: 1,158
I guess the new seat pans would be placed on the existing frames--but it's too bad, if the seat pans are thinner, that they couldn't be left at the existing height or even raised a little, providing more room for carry-on storage and/or feet/legs (i.e., rather than the top dropping an inch, the bottom would be an inch higher). I can't think of a passenger I've seen who has had a headroom issue when seated.
