Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Family Boarding inbetween A29-A30

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2011, 9:27 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 293
Family Boarding inbetween A29-A30

So this was a first for me. On a flight today from SLC to PHX they boarded A-1 through A29. Then called for Family boarding, then A30 on. We were A 34, 40, 41. There must have been a lot of though passengers since the only row left was second to the back. Is this a new order to board?
ljknecht570 is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2011, 7:33 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northern New Jersey
Programs: OnePass, AAdvantage, TrueBlue, HHonors
Posts: 2,709
Originally Posted by ljknecht570
So this was a first for me. On a flight today from SLC to PHX they boarded A-1 through A29. Then called for Family boarding, then A30 on. We were A 34, 40, 41. There must have been a lot of though passengers since the only row left was second to the back. Is this a new order to board?
My guess is the Operations Agent just screwed up. Family boarding is still between the A and B boarding groups.
Seat13c is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2011, 1:36 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
family boarding with lots of thru passengers

i've seen this a few times, esp if there are 40+ through passengers, that family boarding can happen as early as after the pre boarders.
nittanydave is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2011, 9:33 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 293
There were a lot of throughs since we were at the back of the plane with A34. Just curious.
ljknecht570 is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 11:51 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Programs: swa
Posts: 48
If I paid for early bird in this suituation and was in A31 to A60, I would be unhappy.
smartyibm is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 4:23 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by smartyibm
If I paid for early bird in this suituation and was in A31 to A60, I would be unhappy.
Me, too! I think any EBCI boarding number that isn't an "A" is a ripoff. Southwest should limit the number sold to guarantee "A".
GottaLuvCruising is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 6:33 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United Silver
Posts: 129
Originally Posted by GottaLuvCruising
Me, too! I think any EBCI boarding number that isn't an "A" is a ripoff. Southwest should limit the number sold to guarantee "A".
As I understand it, the problem with that is that they have no way of knowing how many A-Listers will be on the flight. Theoretically, even if they only sold one EBCI, they could potentially get a B card, if there are a ton of A-Listers.
WebDesignGuy is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 8:21 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 293
I think that this is hard situation! I certainly think since I checked in and got A34 I should be able to sit with my DH and my 9 year old DD. But I would also be upset if I had little kids and there were no seats left together. Then again, if I was in this situation, I would have checked in a T24 to ensure I would not have any problems.

The whole thing is screwed up!
ljknecht570 is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2011, 9:41 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northern New Jersey
Programs: OnePass, AAdvantage, TrueBlue, HHonors
Posts: 2,709
If WN ever wanted to help gaurentee the ELCI people to A group, they could limit how many were sold. The revenue dept has the ability to track tendecies on flights. They could very easily do something do a formula like 60 A group BP's - 15 Bus Sel - # of A-Listers tipically on the flight = # of ELBI that can be sold for flight XYZ.

But, then again, they would be limiting something that has proven very profitable for them.
Seat13c is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.