FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   SkyTeam (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/skyteam-412/)
-   -   china eastern airlines will join in ST (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/skyteam/1038657-china-eastern-airlines-will-join-st.html)

MUFFP Jan 12, 2010 6:37 am

china eastern airlines will join in ST
 
MU likes to join in ST.
In this week,MU will declare it.

Then in china,there are CZ/MU/FM in ST.
GOOD NEWS!

Supersonic Swinger Jan 12, 2010 6:48 am

Do you have a source? And what does this mean for Shanghai Airlines?

Given their current financial situations, you'd have to hope they'll pull through.

http://www.centreforaviation.com/new...--garuda/page1

sebastravel Jan 12, 2010 8:02 am

a dark day for FFlyers
 
The day MU gets in any alliance would be a DARK day for Frequent flyers anywhere in the world.

Zazza Jan 12, 2010 1:08 pm

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8900/5.0.0.348 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/132)


Originally Posted by sebastravel
The day MU gets in any alliance would be a DARK day for Frequent flyers anywhere in the world.

Why? Can you please be more explicit?

alex0683de Jan 12, 2010 1:13 pm


Originally Posted by Zazza (Post 13167068)
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8900/5.0.0.348 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/132)



Why? Can you please be more explicit?

MU are dreadful. I've flown them on two trips (SHA-PEK-SHA and PVG-HKG-PVG), and I really hope I never have to see the inside of one of their aircraft again.

I was working in China at the time, and even my Chinese colleagues thought China Eastern was bad (and that I was brave for flying with them).

Zazza Jan 12, 2010 2:48 pm


Originally Posted by alex0683de (Post 13167106)
MU are dreadful. I've flown them on two trips (SHA-PEK-SHA and PVG-HKG-PVG), and I really hope I never have to see the inside of one of their aircraft again.

I was working in China at the time, and even my Chinese colleagues thought China Eastern was bad (and that I was brave for flying with them).

aren't companies required to provide some security reassurance when joining an airline alliance?:confused:

Xiaotung Jan 12, 2010 3:50 pm

Looks like SkyTeam is really getting back at Star and CO. Not very good news for me personally though.

JC25 Jan 13, 2010 3:58 am

What is told about MU is exagerated. I flew a lot inside China on their planes, never have any problem (in F class). As I left ST for *A, this is not a good news, especially if FM moves also to ST. On one part I understand ST strategy about Chinese market, on the other , I still see that there is no ***** company in eastern Asia in ST and this is a pity. About international flights, I took one time MU from PVG to CDG in business, looks like a very average cy no less no more, nothing realy to complain, nothing exiting too.

wavyfly Jan 13, 2010 4:25 am

Bad news for me. So I have only one Air China flight between SHA and CAN now.

really bad....

sniles Jan 13, 2010 8:55 pm


Originally Posted by JC25 (Post 13171249)
What is told about MU is exagerated.

Totally agree. I fly MU probably 10-15 times a year (domestic) and have never had any major issues with them. Personally i like their FF program, i can always get award seats whenever i want.
CA on the other hand has given me the most delays, but I continue to fly them (and FM - old planes) to keep my status within *A.

PMMMDL Jan 14, 2010 6:43 pm

I found MU to be the worst of mainland Chinese carriers.

Poor customer service combined with lots of delays and cancellations.

(Don't even ask for wine in F on domestic Chinese routes, but that goes for all of the airlines there).

toyotaboy95 Jan 14, 2010 9:21 pm


Originally Posted by PMMMDL (Post 13183346)
I found MU to be the worst of mainland Chinese carriers.

All of the Mainland airlines are like that. I'm still following up a complaint with CA from August.:td:

N830MH Jan 14, 2010 11:30 pm


Originally Posted by PMMMDL (Post 13183346)
I found MU to be the worst of mainland Chinese carriers.

Poor customer service combined with lots of delays and cancellations.

(Don't even ask for wine in F on domestic Chinese routes, but that goes for all of the airlines there).

I think MU should have to be more improvement the on-time performance. It should have to take the advantage of MU need to get better service. It need to fixed the congestions control in PEK/PVG and others destinations in China. I can't personally why MU are not good service and it was very poorly on-time performance. It should have to get better for those days. Need to have more understandable to get more flexibility the schedules.

However, MU need to have be best guaranteed to get better on-time performance. The passengers should have to be there at the gate on-time and must to be there at airport is 2.5 hours in advance. Help the passengers need to get speedy check-in at the ticket counter, baggage drop, first class lines. It will have to be reductions the security concerns in China. If you considering to get better passengers arrangement. MU will have try more console up to help the passengers to get better on-time performance and not to be late the time.

dgwright99 Jan 14, 2010 11:51 pm


Originally Posted by sebastravel (Post 13164790)
The day MU gets in any alliance would be a DARK day for Frequent flyers anywhere in the world.

MU J and F on the TPAC routes are very competitive products, often at a great price.

MU domestic has never been a particularly good experience for me - but then neither has any other PRC domestic carrier.

toyotaboy95 Jan 15, 2010 11:43 pm


Originally Posted by N830MH (Post 13184887)
It need to fixed the congestions control in PEK/PVG and others destinations in China. I can't personally why MU are not good service and it was very poorly on-time performance.

Blame the military. No airline dares to challenge the PRC govt. fearing they'll revoke their licences.:D I think that also explains why SZX flights are usually delayed while HKG is ontime.


Originally Posted by dgwright99 (Post 13184958)
MU J and F on the TPAC routes are very competitive products, often at a great price.

MU domestic has never been a particularly good experience for me - but then neither has any other PRC domestic carrier.

Yes MU is a very very cheap solution ex-HKG too (Y) and probably elsewhere if you can get it via a travel agent. It's usually half of competitors.

sniles Jan 16, 2010 12:38 am


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13191334)
No airline dares to challenge the PRC govt. fearing they'll revoke their licences.:D

Make that almost no airline. Rumor has it that last year KLM did something to piss off the Shanghai Airport Authority (state owned) and have since had recurring problems and delays at PVG (i can confirm the delays are true).

N830MH Jan 16, 2010 1:03 am


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13191334)
Blame the military. No airline dares to challenge the PRC govt. fearing they'll revoke their licences.:D I think that also explains why SZX flights are usually delayed while HKG is ontime.

I am completely agree with you. MU will have been banned the licenses for years. So unfortunately, the bad situation for MU will eventually to be suspended service. It should have try to get better improvement on-time performance. It will get better standard and more quality time to get better service.

hfly Jan 16, 2010 6:38 am

I've flown them a lot, but personally never fly Chinese carriers in anything less than J or F. Ido find them worst than Air China or CZ, equal to Hainan, and better then pretty much every other Chinese carrier. In other words, they are okay.

JC25 Jan 17, 2010 6:36 am

I don't understand all these bad reported feelings about domestic chinese flights. I could be true some years ago, especially FM. But nowadays, not at all.
Don't mix airports organisation which are complicated enough, due to sometimes staffs non professional behaviour, and also chinese people behaviour (sometimes .. ok ...forget it) and the comfort and staff in the planes.
In Y , really I don't know. (to crowded, with nightmares queues, sorry) but in F (finally only 2 times Y fares)
I never had any problem : AC, FM, MU, CZ. Chinese style for sure, but if one are there, we don't expect SQ or MH styles. 99% of my flights were on time. I can't say that from AF, LH, LX, KL .... even on middle haul flights.

CXBA Jan 21, 2010 1:39 am


Originally Posted by sniles (Post 13191511)
Make that almost no airline. Rumor has it that last year KLM did something to piss off the Shanghai Airport Authority (state owned) and have since had recurring problems and delays at PVG (i can confirm the delays are true).

that may explain why KLM decided to start flying to Hangzhou.

mogoy Jan 22, 2010 1:25 am


Originally Posted by CXBA (Post 13223620)
that may explain why KLM decided to start flying to Hangzhou.

or the other way round, starting HGH is the reason for PVG to be pissed off.

It seems more likely to me.

HGH is no substitue to PVG !

toyotaboy95 Jan 22, 2010 2:54 am


Originally Posted by MUFFP (Post 13164305)
MU likes to join in ST.
In this week,MU will declare it.

Then in china,there are CZ/MU/FM in ST.
GOOD NEWS!

OP, didn't you say they'll announce this week?:confused:

Kalboz Jan 30, 2010 2:56 pm

For the purpose of earning/using miles, did china eastern airlines join Skyteam or any other alliance yet?

Thanks!

Jiangsu Jan 30, 2010 5:06 pm

Not yet, probably they will decide within 20 days ! That's what they said...:cool:

allset2travel Feb 20, 2010 11:04 am


Originally Posted by Kalboz (Post 13289669)
For the purpose of earning/using miles, did china eastern airlines join Skyteam or any other alliance yet?

Thanks!

No mention of that on their own web site.
I am awaiting for the official announcement as I have half dozen flights on it coming up.

ferd57 Feb 25, 2010 8:50 pm

AA in aliance talks with China Eastern
 
Well it looks like AA is also talking about having China Eastern join One World:


http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61N6H420100224

SKRan Feb 26, 2010 4:19 am

Official news:

1) FM will move out from PEK T3 to T2 to co-locate with MU on 28MAR.
*A and *O currently uses T3 - and *S uses T2. If the new MU is joining either *A or *O then why move FM back and forth? This indicates that MU has already decided to pursue its *S membership.

2) FFP Status will be recognised by MU and FM.
FM will exit *A very soon. *A doesn't generally allow flying non-member airline to get *A status.

3) Mileage can be earned by members of both programmes.

Xiaotung Mar 1, 2010 3:22 pm


Originally Posted by SKRan (Post 13468710)
Official news:

1) FM will move out from PEK T3 to T2 to co-locate with MU on 28MAR.
*A and *O currently uses T3 - and *S uses T2. If the new MU is joining either *A or *O then why move FM back and forth? This indicates that MU has already decided to pursue its *S membership.

2) FFP Status will be recognised by MU and FM.
FM will exit *A very soon. *A doesn't generally allow flying non-member airline to get *A status.

3) Mileage can be earned by members of both programmes.

It might not be as simple as this. Moving FM back to T2 maybe just because MU is harder to move to T3. And it makes sense that MU and FM operate in one terminal. It will be very interesting to see how they deal with PVG.

toyotaboy95 Mar 6, 2010 10:30 pm

The announcement has again been delayed.


China Eastern will announce its membership of an airline alliance in April, Liu told reporters on the sidelines of the National People's Congress. He didn't give any details.
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-...atestheadlines

kiwiandrew Apr 6, 2010 8:17 pm

Interesting article .... but the last sentence had me rolling on the floor laughing .

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchin...nt_9694742.htm

Meanwhile, speculation is rife on which of the world's three airline alliances will win China Eastern's favor.

Currently the Shanghai-based carrier is the last of the nation's three major airlines without membership in any alliance.

Despite wavering for several years, China Eastern is now ready to make its final choice at the end of April, said Liu.

"We will tell you which airline alliance we will enter by the end of April," Liu told the press on Tuesday.

After an impressive tie-up with its former local rival Shanghai Airlines, China Eastern Airlines has made joining one of the three international airline networks - Star Alliance, Sky Team, or Oneworld - a priority.
.....Some analysts expected Liu to join the Sky Team, but Gao said it is better to choose another alliance due to competing relations between China Southern and China Eastern.

"Oneworld will be China Eastern's final choice, although it is smaller in size than the other two.

But it also has stellar members like American Airlines, British Airways, Canadian Airlines and Cathay Pacific," Gao noted.


Has Mr Gao perhaps been asleep for the last 9 years ?

flytofly Apr 7, 2010 9:25 am

FM, or Shanghai Airlines is a "proud" member of *A.
It is NOT a member of ST.


Originally Posted by MUFFP (Post 13164305)
MU likes to join in ST.
In this week,MU will declare it.

Then in china,there are CZ/MU/FM in ST.
GOOD NEWS!


CXBA Apr 7, 2010 10:52 am


Interesting article .... but the last sentence had me rolling on the floor laughing .

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchin...nt_9694742.htm

Meanwhile, speculation is rife on which of the world's three airline alliances will win China Eastern's favor.

Currently the Shanghai-based carrier is the last of the nation's three major airlines without membership in any alliance.

Despite wavering for several years, China Eastern is now ready to make its final choice at the end of April, said Liu.

"We will tell you which airline alliance we will enter by the end of April," Liu told the press on Tuesday.

After an impressive tie-up with its former local rival Shanghai Airlines, China Eastern Airlines has made joining one of the three international airline networks - Star Alliance, Sky Team, or Oneworld - a priority.
.....Some analysts expected Liu to join the Sky Team, but Gao said it is better to choose another alliance due to competing relations between China Southern and China Eastern.

"Oneworld will be China Eastern's final choice, although it is smaller in size than the other two.

But it also has stellar members like American Airlines, British Airways, Canadian Airlines and Cathay Pacific," Gao noted.

Has Mr Gao perhaps been asleep for the last 9 years ?
factual error aside, it is worth noting how comrade chairman Liu keeps pushing decision time ahead every time, first beginning april, now end april... This suggests a certain "disagreement" between him and China's airlines bosses at CAAC on the path to follow. Probably each one of the contenders is lining up and shoring its political godfathers, and the compensation/face saving gesture for the loser is also being discussed.
My 2-fen guess is MU/FM will join OW and comrade chairman will be promoted to another prestigious post with an appropriate compensation.

sniles Apr 7, 2010 7:09 pm


Originally Posted by flytofly (Post 13726227)
FM, or Shanghai Airlines is a "proud" member of *A.
It is NOT a member of ST.

I think the OP meant in the event MU becomes a member of ST, FM will likely follow.

toyotaboy95 Apr 7, 2010 9:07 pm

For some reason, the PRC government doesn't like oneworld, they've blocked the website on the mainland.

I don't find any part of it "offensive" though?:confused:

House Apr 7, 2010 9:14 pm


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13730596)
For some reason, the PRC government doesn't like oneworld, they've blocked the website on the mainland.

I don't find any part of it "offensive" though?:confused:

You are overestimating the sophistication of PRC webs filtering. The problem is that the term "One world" has been used as part of a human rights organization's campaign and also by a certain well known banned Chinese religious group. So the URL is blocked automatically due to its name, without anyone analysing the site content.

If a PRC carrier ever did join Oneworld then an objection from that airline would soon see the website unblocked.

Nothing to do with disliking Oneworld the alliance.

Supersonic Swinger Apr 15, 2010 10:47 pm

Sounds like China Eastern have confirmed they plan to join SkyTeam by mid-2011 - http://www.centreforaviation.com/new...-skyteam/page1

Interestingly, "China Eastern's accession into SkyTeam next year will also put further distance between it and Singapore Airlines, which failed in its bid for the airline in early 2008, as a result of effective interference in the bidding process by Air China. China Eastern, which is seeking an investment partner, is likely to be courting Air France-KLM and/or Delta, which missed out in its pursuit of Japan Airlines in Feb-2010 to the oneworld alliance."

pieterde Apr 16, 2010 9:06 am

From the horse's mouth.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.