Which hotel in Singapore?
Jan 16, 2015, 5:59 am
#77
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
The aptly named Rooftop Bar at the Fullerton hotel sells Cuban cigars which you can smoke anywhere in the bar (it is all open-air, being the top of a former lighthouse). The Italian restaurant below also has Cuban cigars on display but I didn't smoke there (much nicer on the rooftop). The also make great mojitos appropriately enough (something rare in Singapore where mojitos tend to be watered down).
Jan 17, 2015, 1:10 pm
#78
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: HNL & SFO
Programs: UA MM/Gold
Posts: 292
The aptly named Rooftop Bar at the Fullerton hotel sells Cuban cigars which you can smoke anywhere in the bar (it is all open-air, being the top of a former lighthouse). The Italian restaurant below also has Cuban cigars on display but I didn't smoke there (much nicer on the rooftop). The also make great mojitos appropriately enough (something rare in Singapore where mojitos tend to be watered down).
Jan 19, 2015, 9:41 am
#79
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ASIA
Programs: TK Elite, ALL Plus Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,530
However, if you want something a little more Singaporean(*), head over to the aptly named Arab St and try any of a number of shisha (hookah) joints. No alcohol is served, but with a bubbly expertly loaded with Al-Fakher Double Apple and a pot of mint tea, you won't miss it.
(*) Originally Middle Eastern, of course, but rather eagerly adopted!
Jan 20, 2015, 7:01 am
#81
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ASIA
Programs: TK Elite, ALL Plus Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,530
Jan 22, 2015, 6:16 am
#83
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ASIA
Programs: TK Elite, ALL Plus Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,530
Yes, and young adults puking all over the sidewalk and poor residents not being able to sleep, and people being rowdy and then you may end up having a puking, noisy, sleepless riot on your hands.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Jan 22, 2015, 4:29 pm
#84
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,969
Yes, and young adults puking all over the sidewalk and poor residents not being able to sleep, and people being rowdy and then you may end up having a puking, noisy, sleepless riot on your hands.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Jan 26, 2015, 1:49 am
#85
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,158
No its not. In Little India the ban is already in place.
Its more the problems at the Clarke Quay area and around Zouk after midnight were causing the swift. People buying cheap liquor at convience stores and loitering around at Clarke Quay causing quite some problems. Violent fights, robberies, attack on cabbies, littering, noise are now pretty common on weekends.
Its more the problems at the Clarke Quay area and around Zouk after midnight were causing the swift. People buying cheap liquor at convience stores and loitering around at Clarke Quay causing quite some problems. Violent fights, robberies, attack on cabbies, littering, noise are now pretty common on weekends.
Jan 26, 2015, 1:59 am
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Jan 26, 2015, 3:43 am
#87
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Terra Australis Cognita
Posts: 5,350
Ban imposed in November 2014, all existing stocks must be consumed by July 31, 2016. Apparently just exorbitant taxation wasn't enough.
And yes, this is quite likely to kneecap Arab St pretty badly: http://theurbanwire.com/2014/12/arab-streets-last-puff/
Owners of shisha joints in Arab street said shisha sales account for 60 to 80 per cent of their business.
Jan 27, 2015, 6:33 am
#89
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brunei
Programs: Enrich Sapphire. Kris Flyer Silver.Le Club Accorhotels,Starwood.
Posts: 2,201
Yes, and young adults puking all over the sidewalk and poor residents not being able to sleep, and people being rowdy and then you may end up having a puking, noisy, sleepless riot on your hands.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Reminds me of the chewing gum law. Why did they bring that in? : because the MRT doors couldnt shut properly (trains couldnt leave) as people were sticking chewing gum between the doors.
Chewing gum ban was enforced even before the first MRT's were running back in 1987. It was because people were dumping gum on the street and sidewalks that the govt got fed up and just banned it.
Jan 27, 2015, 3:20 pm
#90
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,969
Chewing gum ban in Singapore
History
In his memoirs, Lee Kuan Yew recounted that as early as 1983, when he was still serving as Prime Minister, a proposal for the ban was brought up to him by the then Minister for National Development. Chewing gum was causing serious maintenance problems in high-rise public housing flats, with vandals disposing of spent gum in mailboxes, inside keyholes and even on elevator buttons. Chewing gum left on the ground, stairways and pavements in public areas increased the cost of cleaning and damaged cleaning equipment. Gum stuck on the seats of public buses was also considered a problem. However, Lee thought that a ban would be "too drastic" and did not take action.
In 1987, the S$5 billion metro system, the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT), started running. It was then the largest public project ever implemented in Singapore, and expectations were high. One of the champions of the project, Ong Teng Cheong, who later became the first democratically-elected President, declared,"… the MRT will usher in a new phase in Singapore's development and bring about a better life for all of us."
It was then reported that vandals had begun sticking chewing gum on the door sensors of MRT trains, preventing doors from functioning properly and causing disruption to train services. Such incidents were rare but costly and culprits were difficult to apprehend. In January 1992, Goh Chok Tong, who had just taken over as Prime Minister, decided on a ban. The restriction on the distribution of chewing gum was enacted in Singapore Statute Chapter 57, the Control of Manufacture Act, which also governs the restriction of alcohol and tobacco.
Immediate results of ban
After the ban was announced, the import of chewing gum was immediately halted. However, a reasonable transition period was given to allow shops to clear their existing stocks. After that, the sale of chewing gum was completely terminated.
When first introduced, the ban caused much controversy and some open defiance. Some took the trouble of travelling to neighbouring Johor Bahru, Malaysia, to purchase chewing gum. Offenders were publicly "named and shamed" by the government, to serve as a deterrent to other would-be smugglers. No black market for chewing gum in Singapore ever emerged, though some Singaporeans occasionally still manage to smuggle some chewing gum from Johor Bahru for their own consumption. The ban has been partially lifted, as some types of gum are allowable, such as gum chewed for dental health. However, the government refuses to completely lift the ban for the risk of gum littering again.
International attention
In the mid 1990s, Singapore's laws began to receive international press coverage. For example, the U.S. media paid great attention to the case of Michael P. Fay, an American teenager sentenced in 1994 to caning in Singapore for vandalism (for using spray paint, not chewing gum.) They also drew attention to some of Singapore's other laws, including the "mandatory flushing of public toilets" rule. Confused reporting about these issues has led to worldwide propagation of the myth that the use or importation of chewing gum is itself punishable with caning. In fact, this has never been a caning offence, and the only penalties provided under Chapter 57 are fines.
When a BBC reporter suggested that such draconian laws would stifle the people's creativity, Lee Kuan Yew retorted: "If you can't think because you can't chew, try a banana."
Revision of the Act
U.S. President George W. Bush and Singapore Prime Minister Chok Tong Goh sign a free trade agreement in the White House, 6 May 2003. White House photo by Tina Hager.
In 1999, United States President Bill Clinton and Singapore Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong agreed to initiate talks between the two countries for a bilateral free trade agreement (USS-FTA). The talks later continued under the new administration of President George W. Bush. Details of the closed-door negotiations are unknown, but it became apparent that by the final phase of the negotiation in early 2003, there remained two unrelated issues: the War in Iraq and chewing gum.
The Chicago-based Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company enlisted the help of a Washington, D.C lobbyist and of Illinois Congressman Phil Crane, then-chairman of the United States House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade, to get chewing gum on the agenda of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement. This caused a dilemma for the Singapore Government. It recognised the health benefits of certain gums, such as a brand of sugar-free gum that contains calcium lactate to strengthen tooth enamel. Sale of this newly categorised medicinal gum was allowed, provided it was sold by a dentist or pharmacist, who must take down the names of buyers.
Soon, the USS-FTA was signed and the ban was revised. "They were tough," Crane said of the talks. Some found it surprising that Wrigley had fought hard on this battle, given the small size of Singapore's chewing market. But the company said it was worth it. "There's many examples in our history of things that may have not made short-term financial sense but was the right thing to do in a philosophical or long-term sense," said Christopher Perille, Wrigley's senior director of corporate communications.
Last edited by uk1; Jan 27, 2015 at 3:29 pm