Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Weird "lunch" timing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2018, 7:28 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Weird "lunch" timing

Was on SQ 634 and SQ 011 recently in J. The first departs at 1405 from SIN to HND and the second departs from NRT at 1455 both with flight times of >6.5 hours. Yet both served a full meal about an hour and a half after take off. It struck me that it would be so much more sensible to serve a full dinner say 3 hours after take off i.e. close to 6 pm and a normal mealtime.
I thought it might be the crew just wanting to get their meal service done so they can relax, but on the SIN/HND flight the meal is actually labelled "lunch". Does anyone know the reason for this strange timing?
KACommuter is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2018, 8:58 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
Programs: SQ TPP, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 155
So that passengers can maximize sleep time.
Ex-SIN is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2018, 9:29 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Originally Posted by Ex-SIN
So that passengers can maximize sleep time.
On day flights with a 1 hour time zone change?
KACommuter is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2018, 10:36 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,645
Originally Posted by KACommuter
On day flights with a 1 hour time zone change?
Also gives the cabin crew a larger gap so they can do rest rotations so don't time out.
nzkarit is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2018, 11:50 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: MNL / SFO / NYC
Programs: IHG Spire | Marriott Plat | UA Plat | AA Plat Pro
Posts: 533
Originally Posted by KACommuter
On day flights with a 1 hour time zone change?
There could be cost matters in considering serving dinner later in the flight instead of lunch right after departure. It might be costly to maintain the food quality for an additional 3 to 4 so hours for a dinner service. There could also be logistic concerns with certain food items that can't be served because they can't be kept at an acceptable level for that long (but since I don't work at an airline caterer, these are just guesses).
TravelwhileyouEat is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 12:15 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Originally Posted by TravelwhileyouEat
There could be cost matters in considering serving dinner later in the flight instead of lunch right after departure. It might be costly to maintain the food quality for an additional 3 to 4 so hours for a dinner service. There could also be logistic concerns with certain food items that can't be served because they can't be kept at an acceptable level for that long (but since I don't work at an airline caterer, these are just guesses).
This doesn't sound right as plenty of truly long haul flights serve 2 meals, one at the beginning and one towards the end of the flight.

I should add that satay was served on the NRT/SIN flight which departed NRT at 1455, and that would have been loaded in Singapore so would have spent at least 7.5 hours on the plane already on the way up to NRT + turnaround at NRT.
KACommuter is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 12:16 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Originally Posted by nzkarit
Also gives the cabin crew a larger gap so they can do rest rotations so don't time out.
On a 7 hour flight?
KACommuter is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 12:59 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: MNL / SFO / NYC
Programs: IHG Spire | Marriott Plat | UA Plat | AA Plat Pro
Posts: 533
The only other things I can think of is A) that this is the 'conventional' or 'traditional' flow of service non-frequent passengers come to expect when flying and so SQ kept it, i.e. board > take-off > meal > sleep / work / IFE / whatever > 2nd meal if there is one > land or B) this is how SQ management want it done

It also comes down to passenger preference, some want lunch and other would like dinner. It's like those LH flights where the 2nd meal is labelled 'Breakfast' because your first meal was 'Dinner' but you're arriving at 9pm destination local time. Some find this fine, others find it weird since they're already trying to acclimate to the new time zone and would have preferred dinner as the 2nd meal.
kaffir76 likes this.
TravelwhileyouEat is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 2:37 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
Doesn't apply for SQ 634, but for SQ11, for probably half of the passengers, it's already 9pm (body clock time) by the time of pushback ... so it probably feels like a late dinner ....
lokijuh is online now  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 5:44 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Originally Posted by lokijuh
Doesn't apply for SQ 634, but for SQ11, for probably half of the passengers, it's already 9pm (body clock time) by the time of pushback ... so it probably feels like a late dinner ....
Ah yes - half of them were from LAX. This sounds much more plausible than all the other explanations!

But that also means the satay was loaded in Singapore well over 24 hours before.
KACommuter is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 6:20 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,267
Originally Posted by KACommuter
On day flights with a 1 hour time zone change?
It makes sense to me. Consider my itinerary for Jan 2019:

BKK > SIN dep. 9 PM arrive 12:30 AM
SIN > NRT dep 9 AM arrive 5 PM

We'll see how it goes, but I doubt I'll be interested in blowing some cash on a hotel at SIN. At best, I could get a few hours of sleep. Alternatively, I could hang out in the lounge and then sleep on the flight to NRT. That way, I'll still have some pep to see a bit of Tokyo once I get settled.
lobo411 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2018, 7:16 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 654
Originally Posted by KACommuter
Ah yes - half of them were from LAX. This sounds much more plausible than all the other explanations!

But that also means the satay was loaded in Singapore well over 24 hours before.
i don’t think satay is served on LAX departures.....may be wrong but I can’t recall having it.
Mlee888 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2018, 1:07 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York
Posts: 7,347
Originally Posted by lobo411
It makes sense to me. Consider my itinerary for Jan 2019:

BKK > SIN dep. 9 PM arrive 12:30 AM
SIN > NRT dep 9 AM arrive 5 PM

We'll see how it goes, but I doubt I'll be interested in blowing some cash on a hotel at SIN. At best, I could get a few hours of sleep. Alternatively, I could hang out in the lounge and then sleep on the flight to NRT. That way, I'll still have some pep to see a bit of Tokyo once I get settled.
If this is a thru ticket, Singapore Airlines can check through your bags and give you all the boarding passes. You can then book a room at the transit hotel in terminal three. They are pretty affordable and you can book by hours. The hotel itself is nothing fancy but is a nice alternative to sitting in the lounge.

Harilela Hospitality

Carfield
Carfield is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2018, 2:05 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Programs: M&M SEN, Amex Plat, Club Carlson, Marriott, HHonors & Accor Gold, Velocity Silver, Qantas Bronze
Posts: 3,767
SQ has weird way of serving food. I was on SQ308 (SIN-LHR, 13h 40 mins) in May last year and they served breakfast after the departure from SIN and then lunch before arrival to LHR. Considering 09:00 departure and 15:40 arrival, I was thinking that lunch would be served about 3 hours before arrival to LHR. Wrong! They started serving lunch six (6!) hours before arrival to LHR. By the time I reached my hotel in London, I was starving...
vbroucek is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2018, 7:42 am
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
Originally Posted by Mlee888


i don’t think satay is served on LAX departures.....may be wrong but I can’t recall having it.
All I can say is I was served satay on the NRT/SIN leg of a LAX/NRT/SIN flight.

I suspect the reason for not serving satay on the LAX/NRT leg is it departs at 9 am and arrives at 1:45 pm. So presumably breakfast and lunch are served, and satay is not served for either of these meals.
KACommuter is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.