The SQ A350 - shockingly bad J-class seat
#152
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 856
Only if you have an infant travelling with you. Otherwise, you should be able to call and ask for the space, if available. Note that you might be moved if a passenger travelling with infant requires the space.
#153
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: KrisFlyer Elite Gold
Posts: 113
Review of SQ A350 J ... does mention the cramped leg/feet room when sleeping.
http://www.traveller.com.au/airline-...chester-gv3s4e
http://www.traveller.com.au/airline-...chester-gv3s4e
#156
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SIN
Programs: SQ TPP, UA 1K MM
Posts: 518
2. There are no bassinet attachment points in row 11 of the A350. None in row 11 of the 77W either.
#157
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Programs: SQ & QF
Posts: 1,302
Are you sure you're not on the A380 as the 4 class version has bassinet on row 11.
#158
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 66
Sorry! Referring to the 7wr
#159
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tennessee
Programs: SPG, Marriott, United, SWA, AA
Posts: 700
I booked mine 10 months out and I was not allowed row 11 when I called in to get my seats, but I was allowed row 19 for some reason? This is on the SIN-MAN-IAH route.
I am a little confused on if row 19 is better for tall people than the other rows. I have heard a little of "yes it is" and "no its smaller". Can anyone tell me for sure if I need to try and get another seat than my 19A, as I stand 6' 2"
I am a little confused on if row 19 is better for tall people than the other rows. I have heard a little of "yes it is" and "no its smaller". Can anyone tell me for sure if I need to try and get another seat than my 19A, as I stand 6' 2"
#160
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SIN
Programs: SQ TPP, UA 1K MM
Posts: 518
#162
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Singapore
Programs: SQ TPPS, BA Silver
Posts: 333
I don't think SQ will be pleased with me for posting this, but recently after listening to a lot of moaning about how the new J seats aren't great on the A350 and have been "shoehorned" into the aircraft, I did a small comparison.
I've only flown the A350 J on short-haul flights and I have always felt they were exactly the same as those on the 77W but the comparison has blown my mind away. There is a width difference in the footwell after all!! And I guess for some who are taller, it makes all the difference between a good and a bad seat.
Have a look:
A350:
77W:
I would say the difference is about 3 inches or so.
The length of the side padding seemed to be similar:
A350:
77W:
But again the depth of the 77W footwell seeemed deeper. You can also see the width difference in the pictures below.
A350:
77W:
So there you go! There is a difference after all. To me it wasn't significant enough to notice until I made an actual comparison. However I have yet to fly the A350 long-haul, so perhaps only in bed-mode would I notice it. Unlike the 2006 J where the 77W and A380 versions are quite obviously different, SQ has managed to make the differences here so subtle that I still can't quite figure out where the inches have been shaved off the back of the seat. My suspicion is that the mirror and storage compartment have been made slightly narrower in line with the narrower footwell.
I think only the tallest of customers will notice the difference (and wonder what's going on), but for most average height people like me, it wouldn't affect us much, if at all.
I've only flown the A350 J on short-haul flights and I have always felt they were exactly the same as those on the 77W but the comparison has blown my mind away. There is a width difference in the footwell after all!! And I guess for some who are taller, it makes all the difference between a good and a bad seat.
Have a look:
A350:
77W:
I would say the difference is about 3 inches or so.
The length of the side padding seemed to be similar:
A350:
77W:
But again the depth of the 77W footwell seeemed deeper. You can also see the width difference in the pictures below.
A350:
77W:
So there you go! There is a difference after all. To me it wasn't significant enough to notice until I made an actual comparison. However I have yet to fly the A350 long-haul, so perhaps only in bed-mode would I notice it. Unlike the 2006 J where the 77W and A380 versions are quite obviously different, SQ has managed to make the differences here so subtle that I still can't quite figure out where the inches have been shaved off the back of the seat. My suspicion is that the mirror and storage compartment have been made slightly narrower in line with the narrower footwell.
I think only the tallest of customers will notice the difference (and wonder what's going on), but for most average height people like me, it wouldn't affect us much, if at all.
#163
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 973
That's been mentioned quite a few times in this thread - if anything they wouldn't be pleased at this entire thread rather than just your post. I wonder if they'll take note and rectify things for the ULR. 19 hours in that seat will really p1ss a lot of taller people off.