BA B787 G-ZBKP taxiway incident Edmonton

Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:16 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,438
BA B787 G-ZBKP taxiway incident Edmonton

Just seen this via Aeronews on Facebook:

G-ZBKP at Edmonton International Airport

BAeuro is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:18 am
  #2  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,438
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:

1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback
2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux
3) 777 get covered in foam
4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass
BAeuro is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:21 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, AA Gold, A3 Gold, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 1,251
I am glad BA is more successful at flying planes than parking them
mrow is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:22 am
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 63
Pushed back too far.
SxMan likes this.
bradders239 is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,212
Originally Posted by BAeuro
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:

1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback

4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass
Double case of the wingwalker not doing exactly the job he/she's been paid to perform...
Crofton138 likes this.
13901 is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:38 am
  #6  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,598
Originally Posted by 13901
Double case of the wingwalker not doing exactly the job he/she's been paid to perform...
Great, you've saved the investigation team a fortune there!
DYKWIA is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 9:40 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,212
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
Great, you've saved the investigation team a fortune there!
I'll send 'em a cheap invoice.
13901 is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 10:01 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LHR, LGW
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,405
Originally Posted by BAeuro
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:

1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback
2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux
3) 777 get covered in foam
4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass
Hey! Come on give them a break these planes aren’t used to being parked up and feeling abandoned and unused. I know how they feel!
rockflyertalk is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 2:03 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,833
Originally Posted by BAeuro
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:

1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback
2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux
3) 777 get covered in foam
4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass
Arguably a period of abnormal operations (reduced staffing, new protocols, unfamiliar destinations) is exactly when you would expect more, rather than less incidents.
TraumaDoc and blackdog047 like this.
Kgmm77 is online now  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 2:39 pm
  #10  
formerly mattking2000
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DXB
Programs: BA|AC|AZ|SPG|H|FPC
Posts: 1,182
Originally Posted by BAeuro
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:

1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback
2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux
3) 777 get covered in foam
4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass
Gotta say it's quite a creative way to get insurance to contribute to their cash flow
mrow and toothy like this.
BA Humbug is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 4:51 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AB BA Waterloo Mama Mia
Posts: 1,147
Better question is what does Edmonton need that BA is delivering? I could have hitched a ride from LHR and then made my way home to Vancouver by Air Canada.
testycal is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:00 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: YEG, SFO, VCA, JR JY-13
Programs: hahaha
Posts: 919
There's been a BA 787 flying YEG and back since at least early May (when I started driving by YEG and paying attention). Funnily enough when we were re-opening Phase I, I'd hop around daily barbecues with neighbours. Since we live along the flight path, it's nice to have had some quiet lately. But recently around 5 PM, we can't help but notice the massive BA tail grace the skies above us, massive because we rarely get a widebody 'round these parts.

I also posted this thread last month: Anyone know what plane this is parked at YEG?
asovse1 is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 6:49 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: somewhere north of stateside...
Posts: 4,143
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
makin'miles is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2020, 6:57 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BKK
Programs: Mucci Chevalier de la Brosse a Cheveux Dore, SK *GfL, BA Gold, WY G, HH DIA, IC Plat Amb., Hertz PC
Posts: 3,683
Originally Posted by makin'miles
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
If carrying cargo in the cabin regulations require a minimum crew to keep the cabin safe from cargo accidentally shifting out of position etc.
makin'miles likes this.
SKT-DK is online now  
Old Jun 5, 2020, 2:38 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC, Eurostar
Posts: 3,283
Originally Posted by makin'miles
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
Originally Posted by SKT-DK
If carrying cargo in the cabin regulations require a minimum crew to keep the cabin safe from cargo accidentally shifting out of position etc.
And for fire safety. Passenger cabins tend not to have much in terms of fire suppressant outside of extinguishers. Most (semi-)automated fire suppressant systems work by reducing or eliminating the levels of oxygen in the air around the fire, which is not a situation humans react well to
SKT-DK, TedToToe and flygirl68 like this.
alex67500 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.