Air Canada charging seat selection fees for Asia flights
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ Diamond/*G, IHG Diamond Amb, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,239
Air Canada charging seat selection fees for Asia flights
I just noticed that AC seems to be charging ~$50/segment for selecting a regular Y seat in TPAC flights....while pretty much no other carrier in the TPAC market is doing so; this is quite uncompetitive and instead of forking over $100 for seats I booked Delta instead. Why would they try to roll this out when the Chinese carriers are already offering a superior product at a lower price.
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
I just noticed that AC seems to be charging ~$50/segment for selecting a regular Y seat in TPAC flights....while pretty much no other carrier in the TPAC market is doing so; this is quite uncompetitive and instead of forking over $100 for seats I booked Delta instead. Why would they try to roll this out when the Chinese carriers are already offering a superior product at a lower price.
Were you looking at the Standard Fare. According to AC.com, there is a fee for the seats for those fares on International tickets.
Are the Chinese carriers or CX or BR charging the same fare for the same route (on the same dates?)
Looking at a random YYZ-PEK
This info is on the AC page https://www.aircanada.com/ca/en/aco/...selection.html
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ Diamond/*G, IHG Diamond Amb, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,239
No only for basic. The route I saw it on was SFO-HKG. Though I have flown AC's dirt cheap fares to Asia many times with no seat selection fees and assumed they would never add them because their low cost competitor did not charge for seat assignments.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Are the competitors you're looking at flying non-stop or via China?
Was DL's cost the same as the Chinese ?
Took a peek at SFO-YVR-HKG. Right, no free seat selection for Basic or Standard
#5
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
I just noticed that AC seems to be charging ~$50/segment for selecting a regular Y seat in TPAC flights....while pretty much no other carrier in the TPAC market is doing so; this is quite uncompetitive and instead of forking over $100 for seats I booked Delta instead. Why would they try to roll this out when the Chinese carriers are already offering a superior product at a lower price.
PS-I was surprised to see them charging up to $292 for a preferred seat Toronto to Hong Kong? Really? $292 to sit in a seat with more legroom and less width due to the tray table? Unbelievable.
PS-on flights to HKG it did not show seat selection free for Standard, but when I clicked the seat map there was no charge for Standard, so not really sure what they are doing.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
They don't charge it on all TPAC flights..only ones where "Basic" is one of the choices. Some of the other routes don't have Basic but have Standard as the lowest fare category. I know HKG flights have the basic fare, but I don't think thats the case to Japan/Taiwan/Shanghai.
PS-I was surprised to see them charging up to $292 for a preferred seat Toronto to Hong Kong? Really? $292 to sit in a seat with more legroom and less width due to the tray table? Unbelievable.
PS-on flights to HKG it did not show seat selection free for Standard, but when I clicked the seat map there was no charge for Standard, so not really sure what they are doing.
PS-I was surprised to see them charging up to $292 for a preferred seat Toronto to Hong Kong? Really? $292 to sit in a seat with more legroom and less width due to the tray table? Unbelievable.
PS-on flights to HKG it did not show seat selection free for Standard, but when I clicked the seat map there was no charge for Standard, so not really sure what they are doing.
The screen shot I posted for HKG from the flight selection page shows Basic and Standard seats to HKG are not free on OP's route.
If you saw no fee on the seat map, well, who knows.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
If someone pays $292 extra each way to sit in a preferred seat Toronto to HKG, they should seriously think about getting a mental assessment done.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
I was actually replying to your line
where I assumed you were talking about AC
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: AC SE MM, BA Gold, SQ Silver, Bonvoy Tit LTG, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond
Posts: 44,313
Granted, they read it as "$40" when they clicked yes, but AC is by no means the most expensive "extra legroom" option.
And $400 + $400 may still be significantly cheaper than whatever the PY fare is. If you need the extra space, you go for the cheapest option.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
I have two friends who recently paid $400 USD each for UA E+ on TYO-SFO.
Granted, they read it as "$40" when they clicked yes, but AC is by no means the most expensive "extra legroom" option.
And $400 + $400 may still be significantly cheaper than whatever the PY fare is. If you need the extra space, you go for the cheapest option.
Granted, they read it as "$40" when they clicked yes, but AC is by no means the most expensive "extra legroom" option.
And $400 + $400 may still be significantly cheaper than whatever the PY fare is. If you need the extra space, you go for the cheapest option.
But at least on AC you get 125% miles for PE vs 25% (or maybe zero?) for basic. On a very long haul, that PE cabin can earn some decent mileage but obviously price is the main factor. Still bugs me how much they charge extra for PE on certain routes.
Last edited by mapleg; Jul 17, 2019 at 8:39 pm
#11
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 306
Lot's of tall non-frequent fliers will fork over that $292. They need the legroom to be comfortable-ish on a long flight, but not every tall person can afford premium economy or business.
#12
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
Ha ha , that explains it as I am not in the "tall" demographic. At least for flying it has some advantages.
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Programs: AC SE100K-1MM, NH, DL, AA, BA, Global Entry/Nexus, APEC..
Posts: 18,877
Yes, well, someone would explain the supply-demand-what-the-market-will-bear kind of thing to comment on pricing.
PE to YYZ-TPE, BR is consistently less expensive than AC and it's direct. For YVR-Asia routes it might be more interesting to compare, as AC is up against a very long list of airlines for direct and one-stop routes.
Anyway, if AC wants to charge for seats on Basic and Standard fares on some Asian routes, either it will cost them some business or it won't. Coin toss.
PE to YYZ-TPE, BR is consistently less expensive than AC and it's direct. For YVR-Asia routes it might be more interesting to compare, as AC is up against a very long list of airlines for direct and one-stop routes.
Anyway, if AC wants to charge for seats on Basic and Standard fares on some Asian routes, either it will cost them some business or it won't. Coin toss.
#14
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: YVR
Posts: 1,081