Is this cabotage?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 5
Is this cabotage?
Hello, I am planning to visit my sister that is stationed in Guam. I went to South Korea two years ago and loved the country so we decided to fly into south korea so on the way back to the states, we can spent 12 hours there exploring and seeing south korea. My sister mentioned the cabotage law and I am extremely lost because I have never heard of this before and I have spent too many hours researching this with no clear answer.
We would be flying from Cleveland OH to ICN via Air Canada, then from ICN to Guam via Asiana, then back to ICN via Asiana, spending 12 hours there then flying back to Cleveland, OH via Air Canada.
Is this cabotage? Thanks so much for your help!
We would be flying from Cleveland OH to ICN via Air Canada, then from ICN to Guam via Asiana, then back to ICN via Asiana, spending 12 hours there then flying back to Cleveland, OH via Air Canada.
Is this cabotage? Thanks so much for your help!
Last edited by krohaley91; Jan 18, 2019 at 8:20 am
#2
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,956
Cabotage basically means using one or more foreign airlines AND not using a domestic airline to travel between two domestic destinations. In the US it is expressly disallowed. GUM is a domestic destination, thus you can't fly CLE-YYZ-ICN-GUM without having at least one of these segments be on a US carrier, as you'd be using two foreign airlines (AC and OS) to go between two US cities. This is similar to how you can't buy a ticket between JFK and SFO via YYZ.
If you can't fit a UA segment on that ticket that you want to buy, you can buy two separate round-trip tickets (e.g. CLE-ICN and ICN-GUM), which is not considered cabotage. Just be aware that you'll have to claim and re-check bags in ICN and you would not be protected in case of misconnects.
See DL's explanation here.
If you can't fit a UA segment on that ticket that you want to buy, you can buy two separate round-trip tickets (e.g. CLE-ICN and ICN-GUM), which is not considered cabotage. Just be aware that you'll have to claim and re-check bags in ICN and you would not be protected in case of misconnects.
See DL's explanation here.
Last edited by Palal; Jan 18, 2019 at 6:08 am
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
All four nonstops CLE-YYZ are AC / UA codeshares. So long as you are ticketed on UA for that segment as well as the return, you will hold a CLE-GUM round-trip which does not violate the DOT rules which broadly prohibit what people call cabotage.
You will find that if you try to ticket this as AC on the first and final segments that the system won't ticket it and that sooner or later after hours on the phone, someone at AC will figure out why.
You will find that if you try to ticket this as AC on the first and final segments that the system won't ticket it and that sooner or later after hours on the phone, someone at AC will figure out why.
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,570
Do DOT rules provide any exemption for places like GUM which can be somewhat more difficult than most U.S. destinations to fly to using American carriers? This is a little different than, say, trying to use AC to book a SEA-YYZ-LGA flight.
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,570
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
To answer the above questions:
1. There is no exception for GUM. It is part of the US and therefore US law applies. In fact, the largest DOT violation involving cabotage directly related to GUM.
2. The rule exists because US carriers are generally-speaking prohibited from selling tickets within other countries. Thus, when UA operated a single service SFO-SYD-MEL, it was prohibited from selling SYD-MEL tickets as standalone.
3. Yes, DOT enforces the rule vigilantly. There are $10's millions at stake for US carriers and associated jobs.
4. Cabotage rules exist in almost every country in the world.
1. There is no exception for GUM. It is part of the US and therefore US law applies. In fact, the largest DOT violation involving cabotage directly related to GUM.
2. The rule exists because US carriers are generally-speaking prohibited from selling tickets within other countries. Thus, when UA operated a single service SFO-SYD-MEL, it was prohibited from selling SYD-MEL tickets as standalone.
3. Yes, DOT enforces the rule vigilantly. There are $10's millions at stake for US carriers and associated jobs.
4. Cabotage rules exist in almost every country in the world.
#11
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,596
To be clear, the government is not going to penalize you if you somehow put together a cabotage itinerary. The airline would be penalized for carrying you.
Here is the government's official view on exemptions - they are only for emergency situations when no US carriers are available in certain markets.
#13
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,016
To me it doesn't sound stranger than the Fly America Act, which forces federal servants to book more expensive flights at more inconvenient times of the day, although that rule allows cheating by booking codeshares, something the cabotage rule doesn't seem to allow.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
#15
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,596
You'd also have to go through immigration twice at YYZ (once to enter Canada, then again for US preclearance), so you'd need to pad that connection a lot.