Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Twice diverted flight slides off runway / UA878 739 N30401 Overran Runway @ Green Bay

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Twice diverted flight slides off runway / UA878 739 N30401 Overran Runway @ Green Bay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2018, 9:51 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Programs: Hertz PC
Posts: 657
Twice diverted flight slides off runway / UA878 739 N30401 Overran Runway @ Green Bay

Sounds like flight from hell...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twice-d...-in-green-bay/

Last edited by J.Edward; Feb 23, 2018 at 11:10 am Reason: Update title
bhunt is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 10:03 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 1K MM, HHonors Diamond,PC, Marriott Rewards Gold
Posts: 1,117
they must have had some real
nasty weather in Wisconsin last night. Running off the end of the runway seems to indicate very poor braking conditions. I wonder if the airport had any reports to share with pilots prior to landing.

I sometimes wonder about the longer 737 variants and how there’s less opportunity to flare due to
risk of tail strike.
tryathlete is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 10:30 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/NYC/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,752
Wow, a 739. Who woulda thought?!
riphamilton is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 11:07 am
  #4  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: The shape-shifting urban sprawl that is El Lay. FT member #71.
Programs: UA Gold & MM; DL & AA credit card dirt status; Hilton Diamond; Marriott Fool's Gold
Posts: 4,688
More technical info on the flight, via the excellent Aviation Herald site: Incident: United B739 at Green Bay on Feb 23rd 2018, overran runway on landing
ContinentalFan likes this.
Craig6z is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 11:43 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,454
Originally Posted by Craig6z
More technical info on the flight, via the excellent Aviation Herald site: Incident: United B739 at Green Bay on Feb 23rd 2018, overran runway on landing
First comment on there is spot on "Double diversion, serious weather issues, long duty day, late night arrival, and an aircraft with a high approach speed". Freezing rain in Green Bay probably meant they were ice skating down the runway. Kudos to the pilots here.
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 12:01 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Moreland Hills (CLE)
Programs: Over-entitled UA 1.3MM Gold, AA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott L-T Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 5,521
Kudos to the pilots and thank God there was space off the end of runway 06.
am1108 likes this.
Billiken is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 12:54 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,686
Originally Posted by Billiken
thank God there was space off the end of runway 06.
Thank the FAA
ajGoes likes this.
mduell is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2018, 12:58 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Land of Enchantment!
Programs: Southwest RR, Alaska Mileage Plan™
Posts: 341
I understand the desire to get into an airport, but the incident could have been avoided by staying at the first diversion airport.

Yes, the pilots were able to prevent a crash, but in reality most of the landing ended up beyond the control of the flight crew. Could have been a much worse outcome.
Insulator-King is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2018, 9:02 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: UA Platinum, Delta Platinum
Posts: 5
Higher landing speed on 739s

Originally Posted by tryathlete
they must have had some real
nasty weather in Wisconsin last night. Running off the end of the runway seems to indicate very poor braking conditions. I wonder if the airport had any reports to share with pilots prior to landing.

I sometimes wonder about the longer 737 variants and how there’s less opportunity to flare due to
risk of tail strike.
You are correct - 737-900s are longer to fit more passengers, which in turn limits the amount of flare, which in turn increases the landing speed. Which in this case caused a problem. But I agree 1,000% that United could have prevented this with better rules... pilot fatigue must have been a factor and the plane probably never should have taken off the second time that night. But kudos to the crew for keeping it together under difficult circumstances in the end.
wzrdjr1 is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2018, 9:31 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC, LON
Programs: *
Posts: 2,767
Originally Posted by wzrdjr1
pilot fatigue must have been a factor
You know that how?

Originally Posted by wzrdjr1
United could have prevented this with better .....the plane probably never should have taken off the second time that night.
​​​​​​​on what basis do you say that?
ani90 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.