LN-RKP ferried from Chile to Toulouse [merged non-retrofitted A340 thread]
#301
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: SK-EBD
Posts: 1,273
#302
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
It's on the edge, but the old A330 can actually fly between CPH and SFO. SK did use an old A330 on some rotations in the beginning of ARN-LAX, and that route is longer than CPH-SFO, but they might not be able to do it with a fully loaded bird.
#303
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
I just booked award ticket LAX - ARN that is listed as A330-300.
#306
Suspended
Join Date: May 2017
Location: In the Swiss amoeba's head
Programs: Lowest level possible
Posts: 2,829
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ln-rkp
Cue the "No, they're not using the aircraft a lot" posts from the usual suspect(s). @:-)
#307
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-SIN-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,606
Used every day June 29 - July 6, never spending more than a couple of hours on the ground.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ln-rkp
Cue the "No, they're not using the aircraft a lot" posts from the usual suspect(s). @:-)
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ln-rkp
Cue the "No, they're not using the aircraft a lot" posts from the usual suspect(s). @:-)
#308
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
Used every day June 29 - July 6, never spending more than a couple of hours on the ground.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ln-rkp
Cue the "No, they're not using the aircraft a lot" posts from the usual suspect(s). @:-)
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ln-rkp
Cue the "No, they're not using the aircraft a lot" posts from the usual suspect(s). @:-)
#311
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: SK-EBD
Posts: 1,273
CPH-SFO and ARN-LAX is same distance – the latter just 56 km longer.
In any case: In practice we will not meet an A330 on CPH-SFO.
#312
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Preferable @30.000 feet
Programs: More than one
Posts: 1,673
I rest my case on the capability of the classic A330. The range is in theory 9.700 km, and the distance CPH-SFO is 8.818 km. Headwind could limit the load, though.
CPH-SFO and ARN-LAX is same distance – the latter just 56 km longer.
In any case: In practice we will not meet an A330 on CPH-SFO.
CPH-SFO and ARN-LAX is same distance – the latter just 56 km longer.
In any case: In practice we will not meet an A330 on CPH-SFO.
#313
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
On routes where it is 50-50 does it tend to stick to a prior planned assigned aircraft, or change before flight playing havoc with seat reservations?
#314
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Chase, United
Posts: 403
#315
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ARN
Programs: EBD, HHDiamond
Posts: 52
The A333 to LAX (and HKG) is the Extended Range version of the A330. Those 4 birds are placed at Stockholm. I am pretty sure that the regular old A330 will not be able to neither reach LAX or SFO; They fly to MIA which was said was the max distance.
So, if anybody have been on a A330 from SFO to CPH it must have been the ER version; Can't recall if it had some rotations to SFO when they was delivered from the factory a few years back, but can recall they was "test"-flying from CPH to ORD the first couple of weeks after the delivery. Or maybe the ER version was switched due to some tech-issues with a regular bird as a last option.
Nevertheless, it seems that SAS is trying to limit the LN-RKP to the shortest destinations from primarily CPH, but of course it can (and have been) put into rotation where and when it is needed, including SFO (and PVG & NRT as it happened this week). It make perfectly sense in my view, especially when the bird was still leased with probably some kind of cost setup per mile, so it is "only" a 8 hour flight (like to EWR) where the pax is getting the "bad" experience and not the 11 hour to SFO.
Having said that, we had a trip to MIA from OSL in C with LN-RKP. It was not the end of the world, but will any day prefer any of the other new/refurbished birds...despite some of them seems already pretty worn down!
So, if anybody have been on a A330 from SFO to CPH it must have been the ER version; Can't recall if it had some rotations to SFO when they was delivered from the factory a few years back, but can recall they was "test"-flying from CPH to ORD the first couple of weeks after the delivery. Or maybe the ER version was switched due to some tech-issues with a regular bird as a last option.
Nevertheless, it seems that SAS is trying to limit the LN-RKP to the shortest destinations from primarily CPH, but of course it can (and have been) put into rotation where and when it is needed, including SFO (and PVG & NRT as it happened this week). It make perfectly sense in my view, especially when the bird was still leased with probably some kind of cost setup per mile, so it is "only" a 8 hour flight (like to EWR) where the pax is getting the "bad" experience and not the 11 hour to SFO.
Having said that, we had a trip to MIA from OSL in C with LN-RKP. It was not the end of the world, but will any day prefer any of the other new/refurbished birds...despite some of them seems already pretty worn down!