100% earnings are soon back

Old Feb 13, 2012, 3:53 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: SAS Diamond, Hilton Diamond, IHG RA Spire
Posts: 423
Originally Posted by Johan
It remains to be seen whether this will mean that CPH originating awards will be raised or that STO originating awards lowered, or both realigned to a level somewhere in the middle.
I would we very (pleasantly) surprised if they did not raise them. I can't help but thinking that there is a fairly huge catch to this 100% surprise. It's only a few years back since they tried to raise the upgrade prices, and I can see that happening, plus a revision of the *A awards chart and SK awards chart.

Morale: Spend some of your miles now, unless you want them all to end up like the German Mark in the 20s...
ILS2 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 5:11 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Programs: SK Eurobonus Silver, DL, AA, AY, US
Posts: 600
Originally Posted by asalmane
What's worse is now with the Gold attainment threshold lowered from 70.000 points to 50.000 for residents in Sweden, especially those flying domestic which will earn higher points, lounges will be a zoo, even more crowded than now.
In both the old and the new systems those flying Eco or even Eco-Extra within Scandinavia and Finland will qualify for Gold with segments before they reach the points required.
As the segments needed is now more, this will mean less Golds in the new system for the domestic flyers not more.
mkgrip is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 10:09 am
  #33  
Moderator, Finnair
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MMX (CPH)
Programs: Eurobonus Diamond, QR Gold, AY+ Platinum, A3*G, Nordic Choice Lifetime Platinum, SJ Prio Black
Posts: 14,165
C-pax flying only intra-scandinavian also qualifies through segments and thus have to meet the higher threshold.

Same goes for all econ-flyers to "north-europe" (EU1 area).

So actually the bar is raised for a lot of quite frequent flyers. Maybe the lounges will be a zoo anyway, but I don't think it is because of the 100% earnings.
intuition is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 11:28 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DK
Programs: SK, LH, BA, AF
Posts: 131
It is impossible to make everybody happy...but I for sure like this. Just interesting to see what else they will come up with. It reminds about the the changes BA made to their program earlier this year.
THammer
THammer is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 12:53 pm
  #35  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands
Programs: Marriott LTP, Hilton Gold, ITA Elite+, Cathay S, Singapore S, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 3,147
Will *alliance partners give 100% miles on all fares from then as well?
Currently most "cheap" fares only give 25% or none.. on UA
thomas199023 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 1:01 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by thomas199023
Will *alliance partners give 100% miles on all fares from then as well?
Currently most "cheap" fares only give 25% or none.. on UA
No information on changes in point return with *A partners yet. We can only hope, but it's probably highly unlikely.
Cornelius77 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 1:53 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Koala Lemur
Programs: SK EBD LTG (*G)
Posts: 2,445
Is there a real revenue difference for SAS if their customers choose another FFP? Does not it, in the end, matter just that they fly more SK metal?
SK2751 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 2:04 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Programs: Cutting down :-(
Posts: 604
Originally Posted by Cornelius77
No information on changes in point return with *A partners yet. We can only hope, but it's probably highly unlikely.
That is exactly what is needed to get me back on SK long haul. I really like the ORD-CPH late departure and afternoon arrival, but with the ridicules earnings on SK metal I simply couldn't justify it. And the SK *A award chart is unreal compared to the chart in america.
cvarming is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 2:44 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by cvarming
That is exactly what is needed to get me back on SK long haul. I really like the ORD-CPH late departure and afternoon arrival, but with the ridicules earnings on SK metal I simply couldn't justify it. And the SK *A award chart is unreal compared to the chart in america.
I don't quite understand what you mean here. Do you mean earnings from flying on SK metal and crediting to other *A FFP programs than EB, or do you mean earnings when crediting to EB?
Cornelius77 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 1:36 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Programs: SK*(LT)G, AY
Posts: 153
I think this move can give SK some edge over LCC-s. In the long run also EBGs might win on perks if more pax help to improve the foundation.

I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
tiltslope is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 2:44 am
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Cornelius77
I don't quite understand what you mean here. Do you mean earnings from flying on SK metal and crediting to other *A FFP programs than EB, or do you mean earnings when crediting to EB?
Either way, flying SK metal will make a lot more sense as there is the option of crediting the flights to at least some program and earning full miles. For quite some time now, I've done what I can to minimize my use of SK metal and tried to avoid codeshare flights operated by SK because there was no reliable way to earn full miles no matter how I split a multiple airline itinerary ticketed under a single PNR.

When others book flights for me, a simple instruction to avoid SK-operated flights was the order of the day because I wasn't about to micromanage the process and increase everyone's frustration by telling them that SK is fine as long as all the SK-operated segments were booked in the following fare class codes _____. SK complicated matters too much for them to be a first choice for me even where the route network made sense for me. That's why they lost a good chunk of my business.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 2:49 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MMX/CPH
Programs: SK*G, FB, AY
Posts: 36
Any transition rules?

What happens if a EB-member has his qualifying period ending at the end of May and if he at that time has collected a number of flights somewhere between 40 and 50? Will he qualify for Gold or not?

For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
Adde is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 4:48 am
  #43  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,130
Originally Posted by tiltslope
I think this move can give SK some edge over LCC-s. In the long run also EBGs might win on perks if more pax help to improve the foundation.

I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
Unless they have the cash to accrue for the extra miles handed out (required by IFRIC 13) they will have to cut some benefits somewhere.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 4:59 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CPH
Programs: SK EBG |CSA OK+ Gold | SPG Gold | CO, BD, QR, AF lowlife
Posts: 607
Originally Posted by Adde
What happens if a EB-member has his qualifying period ending at the end of May and if he at that time has collected a number of flights somewhere between 40 and 50? Will he qualify for Gold or not?

For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
As I understand it on the facebook comments it's a hard cut, so he would have to make the 40 flights before May 4th. Otherwise it will be 50 flights.
SirRagnar is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2012, 5:34 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MMX/CPH
Programs: SK*G, FB, AY
Posts: 36
Originally Posted by SirRagnar
As I understand it on the facebook comments it's a hard cut, so he would have to make the 40 flights before May 4th. Otherwise it will be 50 flights.
Hm, interesting. If this is true, I think some people might miss the Gold qualification just because they are unlucky with the timing.

For me personally (forced by company travel policy to book the cheapest options), I currently normally qualify for Gold on a number of SK flights between 40 and 50 per year. With the new rules I will easily qualify on number of points instead.

But, if I would have had my qualifying period ending in May, June, July or August I am not 100% sure that I would qualify, since I would then either have to reach 50 SK flights or 50000 point counting a lot of the 25% earnings from the past year.

Luckily my qualification period ends in March.
Adde is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.