100% earnings are soon back
#31
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: SAS Diamond, Hilton Diamond, IHG RA Spire
Posts: 423
Morale: Spend some of your miles now, unless you want them all to end up like the German Mark in the 20s...
#32
Join Date: Apr 2009
Programs: SK Eurobonus Silver, DL, AA, AY, US
Posts: 600
As the segments needed is now more, this will mean less Golds in the new system for the domestic flyers not more.
#33
Moderator, Finnair
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MMX (CPH)
Programs: Eurobonus Diamond, QR Gold, AY+ Platinum, A3*G, Nordic Choice Lifetime Platinum, SJ Prio Black
Posts: 14,165
C-pax flying only intra-scandinavian also qualifies through segments and thus have to meet the higher threshold.
Same goes for all econ-flyers to "north-europe" (EU1 area).
So actually the bar is raised for a lot of quite frequent flyers. Maybe the lounges will be a zoo anyway, but I don't think it is because of the 100% earnings.
Same goes for all econ-flyers to "north-europe" (EU1 area).
So actually the bar is raised for a lot of quite frequent flyers. Maybe the lounges will be a zoo anyway, but I don't think it is because of the 100% earnings.
#34
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DK
Programs: SK, LH, BA, AF
Posts: 131
It is impossible to make everybody happy...but I for sure like this. Just interesting to see what else they will come up with. It reminds about the the changes BA made to their program earlier this year.
THammer
THammer
#35
#36
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
#38
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Programs: Cutting down :-(
Posts: 604
That is exactly what is needed to get me back on SK long haul. I really like the ORD-CPH late departure and afternoon arrival, but with the ridicules earnings on SK metal I simply couldn't justify it. And the SK *A award chart is unreal compared to the chart in america.
#39
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 19
That is exactly what is needed to get me back on SK long haul. I really like the ORD-CPH late departure and afternoon arrival, but with the ridicules earnings on SK metal I simply couldn't justify it. And the SK *A award chart is unreal compared to the chart in america.
#40
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Programs: SK*(LT)G, AY
Posts: 153
I think this move can give SK some edge over LCC-s. In the long run also EBGs might win on perks if more pax help to improve the foundation.
I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
#41
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
When others book flights for me, a simple instruction to avoid SK-operated flights was the order of the day because I wasn't about to micromanage the process and increase everyone's frustration by telling them that SK is fine as long as all the SK-operated segments were booked in the following fare class codes _____. SK complicated matters too much for them to be a first choice for me even where the route network made sense for me. That's why they lost a good chunk of my business.
#42
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MMX/CPH
Programs: SK*G, FB, AY
Posts: 36
Any transition rules?
What happens if a EB-member has his qualifying period ending at the end of May and if he at that time has collected a number of flights somewhere between 40 and 50? Will he qualify for Gold or not?
For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
#43
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,130
I think this move can give SK some edge over LCC-s. In the long run also EBGs might win on perks if more pax help to improve the foundation.
I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
I expect SK to go for less point bargains and smaller reductions to balance more points to be given out. They certainly have tested a lot of reward options during previous year, not always welcomed here, but perhaps done for purpose.
#44
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CPH
Programs: SK EBG |CSA OK+ Gold | SPG Gold | CO, BD, QR, AF lowlife
Posts: 607
What happens if a EB-member has his qualifying period ending at the end of May and if he at that time has collected a number of flights somewhere between 40 and 50? Will he qualify for Gold or not?
For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
For such a person would it matter if he reached the current 40 flight level before or after May 4?
#45
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MMX/CPH
Programs: SK*G, FB, AY
Posts: 36
For me personally (forced by company travel policy to book the cheapest options), I currently normally qualify for Gold on a number of SK flights between 40 and 50 per year. With the new rules I will easily qualify on number of points instead.
But, if I would have had my qualifying period ending in May, June, July or August I am not 100% sure that I would qualify, since I would then either have to reach 50 SK flights or 50000 point counting a lot of the 25% earnings from the past year.
Luckily my qualification period ends in March.