Community
Wiki Posts
Search

how to do damage control?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2010, 11:22 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CPH
Programs: HH-Diamond, Scandic Top Floor, *SK-G, Choice Club Gold
Posts: 186
how to do damage control?

SK is loosing 160MSEK every day the volcano is active. With their existing budget we are talking about 2-3 weeks before they are bankrupt. In worst case the volcano activity can go on for years (and even wake up the even bigger sister volcano).

So being a bit pessimistic, I am doing damage control in case SK does go bankrupt:

I have 4 IC SK flight throughout the year, but fortunately I have bough a seperate year long insurance for bankruptcy as well as paid with credit card so I guess my money is secured.

My wife and I do, however have about 550.000 EB points that I need to transfer to another reliable airline. My thought is to call EB on monday and buy Star alliance award tickets on TG, SQ.

If things go bad, I still have my tickets. If everything solves, then I could cancel these flight and get my points back.

Any thoughts on this?
airborn is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 1:37 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CPH
Programs: SK Diamond (*G), HH Gold
Posts: 580
The Scandinavian governments will never let SAS go bankrupt on a background like this. Same goes for the other countries and their major airlines. This is a very special situation where the economic stability of the whole EU region is at stake if this goes on for weeks.
BHIL is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 2:16 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stockholm, NYC
Programs: UA 1K, AY Gold, Hyatt diamond.
Posts: 157
don't worry

The owners of SAS are unaware of the notion of sunk cost and will pour money indefintly into SAS in order to try to recoup their previous losses. Since the major owners have the ability to tax - they have very deep pockets.

The Swedish Minister of Transportation previously (before the latets cash infusion) said that she believed it would be a bad deal for the government if they sold their shares - since she though SAS had a great future.
bowman is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 2:22 am
  #4  
jth
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ARN/STO
Programs: SK EBS, BAEC blue, SPG
Posts: 586
Originally Posted by bowman
The Swedish Minister of Transportation previously (before the latets cash infusion) said that she believed it would be a bad deal for the government if they sold their shares - since she though SAS had a great future.
Quite intreesting that we have yet to hear her make any public statements regarding the latest developments. Guess she is sitting tight in her house up in the west botnia forests
jth is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 4:30 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I just don't see the European governments letting their national flag carriers go under right now due to circumstances like this. Either way, this will leave the carriers in even more economically strained conditions than they already are even as I am expecting that air fares are going to be jacked up for flights whenever airspace opens up to basically normal conditions.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 6:20 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: EB*G, BT VIP
Posts: 770
Saving national airlines? How about Norwegian, Wideroe, Malmo Aviation, Nextjet, Skyways, Blue1, Finncomm?
another_shot is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 6:22 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oslo
Programs: EB*G, BD*G, HH Silver, FB, AA, SPG, Hertz #1 Gold
Posts: 1,056
Originally Posted by airborn
SK is loosing 160MSEK every day the volcano is active.
It's a lot less. If all traffic stands, SAS is loosing around 120SEK daily in revenues. However they net losses is a lot less and they don't have to spend any money on fuel, maintenance and airport taxes.

They still have to pay their employees though, but at least in Norway, all their ground crews that are not needed will be put on temporary leave from Monday and the rest, inc. flying staff, will be placed on leave from Wednesday. That means that they won't have to pay around 6.000 employees any salaries from that they.

Don't know about the situation and labour laws in DK and SE?
Someone83 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 6:30 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: EBG
Posts: 6
Originally Posted by another_shot
Saving national airlines? How about Norwegian, Wideroe, Malmo Aviation, Nextjet, Skyways, Blue1, Finncomm?
Well, apart from maybe Norwegian these are not real National airlines so there is a huge difference.
RB_STHLM is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 8:09 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,369
Originally Posted by Someone83
It's a lot less. If all traffic stands, SAS is loosing around 120SEK daily in revenues. However they net losses is a lot less and they don't have to spend any money on fuel, maintenance and airport taxes.
Unless the routes themselves are profitable it's less damaging to SAS finances to ground planes. That said, this can't go on for too long.
Fredrik74 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 1:28 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Finland
Programs: too many to list
Posts: 709
Originally Posted by airborn
My thought is to call EB on monday and buy Star alliance award tickets on TG, SQ.

If things go bad, I still have my tickets.
If SK really goes bankrupt, I doubt their award tickets are worth even the paper they are printed on. TG and SQ are not charities, and I don't think they are honouring award tickets, if nobody is paying for them.
ramo is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2010, 2:06 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: here and there
Programs: EB*G, UA ex1K
Posts: 570
Originally Posted by airborn
SK is loosing 160MSEK every day the volcano is active. With their existing budget we are talking about 2-3 weeks before they are bankrupt. In worst case the volcano activity can go on for years (and even wake up the even bigger sister volcano).

So being a bit pessimistic, I am doing damage control in case SK does go bankrupt:

Any thoughts on this?
I think you may be overreacting.

I don't think the national and EU governments will (or should) let this situation push any reasonable-sized airlines (state-owned or otherwise) directly into bankruptcy.

Pretty much all European airlines have been seriously affected and I don't think the authorities will want to see a sudden surge of airline failures that would de-stabilize the industry, especially when it is precipitated by something so far out of anyone's control.

I'm not necessarily optimistic about SK's long term prospects, but so far this hasn't really affected my opinion.
neko is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2010, 12:18 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CPH
Programs: HH-Diamond, Scandic Top Floor, *SK-G, Choice Club Gold
Posts: 186
Originally Posted by ramo
If SK really goes bankrupt, I doubt their award tickets are worth even the paper they are printed on. TG and SQ are not charities, and I don't think they are honouring award tickets, if nobody is paying for them.
doesn´t the partner arlines get paid at the time of reservation and ticketing (when points are deducted from my account?). I think this is the case and if so, I doubt that they will not honor a flight that I have a confirmed reservation on with their carrier.

I truly hope that all of you are right about the govenment/EU stepping in and saving the airlines. At this stage I rather overreact and have my points secured in tickets with asian carriers, rather than underreact and see my half a million points vanish in the air..
airborn is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2010, 4:51 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Programs: EB*G, BT VIP
Posts: 770
Originally Posted by RB_STHLM
Well, apart from maybe Norwegian these are not real National airlines so there is a huge difference.
Huge difference is exactly where? (By the way there is no definition of national airline).

Tell me any single reason, why SAS should be saved, and Wideroe or Nextjet not?
another_shot is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2010, 5:14 am
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by airborn
doesn´t the partner arlines get paid at the time of reservation and ticketing (when points are deducted from my account?). I think this is the case and if so, I doubt that they will not honor a flight that I have a confirmed reservation on with their carrier.
You may want to revise your thinking on this matter.

Generally operating carriers get paid from money collected by the ticketing carrier after the ticket coupon is used (i.e., flight flown) and processed by the ticket clearing/settlement entity.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2010, 5:21 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by another_shot
Huge difference is exactly where? (By the way there is no definition of national airline).

Tell me any single reason, why SAS should be saved, and Wideroe or Nextjet not?
Good reasons or not, it's about the likelihood of what will happen. The chances of the Scandinavian governments helping bail out Wideroe or Nextjet are less than the chances of these same governments helping bail out SAS -- something to do with government investors often preferring to protect their government investments or preferring to bailing out big players rather than small ones.
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.