Drastic change to Hong Kong

Old Jul 11, 20, 8:50 am
  #1  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
Drastic change to Hong Kong

Hong Kong is now requiring that all incoming crews be tested for covid upon arrival. With the threat that the whole crew be quarantined if one is found positive.
This brings the potential for serious operational disruptions.
QR is adjusting by completely changing the schedule of its QR817/818 (twice weekly), making it extremely difficult to connect from Europe.

Last edited by brunos; Jul 11, 20 at 9:20 am
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 11, 20, 11:52 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: HKG, MAN
Programs: CX
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by brunos
Hong Kong is now requiring that all incoming crews be tested for covid upon arrival. With the threat that the whole crew be quarantined if one is found positive.
This brings the potential for serious operational disruptions.
QR is adjusting by completely changing the schedule of its QR817/818 (twice weekly), making it extremely difficult to connect from Europe.
Thanks for the info.

Hopefully that won't affect my flight booked for mid August to Hong Kong. Looking at Google Flights seems like they are still selling flights for everyday during August. Fingers crossed!
IamOmni is offline  
Old Jul 11, 20, 12:44 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
I am in the same boat.
QR818 now operates only 3 weekly and new schedule departs DOH at 10:55am arrives HKG at 00:05.

I strongly doubt that HK will relax its policy within a month or two as there is an exploding new wave.
Maybe airlines will negotiate some other protocole with the HK government.
But HK has suffered from a lot of imported cases and would probably be happy to cap the number of longhaul flights into HK, like China or Australia is doing.
QR and EK are probably targeted as they have been importing a lot of cases from Pakistan, India, ...
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 12:47 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: asia miles
Posts: 394
Originally Posted by brunos
I am in the same boat.
QR818 now operates only 3 weekly and new schedule departs DOH at 10:55am arrives HKG at 00:05.

I strongly doubt that HK will relax its policy within a month or two as there is an exploding new wave.
Maybe airlines will negotiate some other protocole with the HK government.
But HK has suffered from a lot of imported cases and would probably be happy to cap the number of longhaul flights into HK, like China or Australia is doing.
QR and EK are probably targeted as they have been importing a lot of cases from Pakistan, India, ...
quite amazing that those airlines are totally fine to fly people from highly affected areas putting their staff At risk....
blandy62 is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 4:20 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
Originally Posted by blandy62
quite amazing that those airlines are totally fine to fly people from highly affected areas putting their staff At risk....
Hopefully, QR staff are not much at risk with their Hazmat suits. But other pax connecting in DOH from low-risk countries certainly are.

I am also worried about transmission from FAs bending over pax. I was recently on a BA flight from HKG. There were no local cases at the ime, but lots in UK. BA FAs were very lax about masks and distancing rules.
Not a good time to travel with the pandemic resurgence almost everywhere.
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 4:33 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,865
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't that the same policy as China?
s0ssos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 8:31 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
Originally Posted by s0ssos
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't that the same policy as China?
very different in the sense that HK has no restrictions on the number of flights.
But after an EK flight brought 30 pax that tested positive, following a day where they brought some 14, they started to talk tough to airlines. And after some pilot and sea men got sick after flying into HK, the government decided to rescind the test exemption for airline staff and sea men.
the government believes that these many exemptions led to the current third wave.

little to do with mainland China and its very tough rules for foreign airlines.
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 8:43 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,265
AA and UA have cancelled their services to HKG. The problem is not testing, but rather the oddly invasive which local authorities have mandated. (a type of testing which has not remotely been suggested to be more accurate than less invasive means).
Often1 is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 10:31 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
Originally Posted by Often1
AA and UA have cancelled their services to HKG. The problem is not testing, but rather the oddly invasive which local authorities have mandated. (a type of testing which has not remotely been suggested to be more accurate than less invasive means).
To b efair, AA and UA were only planning to restart their operations and decided not to do it. This was clearly one factor. But the restart date had been announced long ago when there was hope that hte covid situation would improve and restrictions in HK and US would be lifted. Loads were miserable and that probably a major factor.

I have no idea what you mean by a more invasive testing technique. I have routinely done the "deep throat saliva test" in Hong Kong. You basically spit in a bottle. Much less invasive and painful than the nose one. Does not require a professional to take risk in sticking into your nose. Possibly less reliable, but you need an experienced professional to go deep in your nose.
http://videocwp.ha.org.hk/wmv/deep%2...a_Eng%20v1.mp4
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 11:43 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,265
Originally Posted by brunos
To b efair, AA and UA were only planning to restart their operations and decided not to do it. This was clearly one factor. But the restart date had been announced long ago when there was hope that hte covid situation would improve and restrictions in HK and US would be lifted. Loads were miserable and that probably a major factor.

I have no idea what you mean by a more invasive testing technique. I have routinely done the "deep throat saliva test" in Hong Kong. You basically spit in a bottle. Much less invasive and painful than the nose one. Does not require a professional to take risk in sticking into your nose. Possibly less reliable, but you need an experienced professional to go deep in your nose.
http://videocwp.ha.org.hk/wmv/deep%2...a_Eng%20v1.mp4
Although the deep nasal approach is quite dated. Newer tests involve a simple self-administered swab of the nose which is conducted in the presence of a professional. The professional hands the patient the sealed tube, watches the seal broken, the test self-administered, the rube resealed and then handed back to the professional.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 12:41 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
Originally Posted by Often1
Although the deep nasal approach is quite dated. Newer tests involve a simple self-administered swab of the nose which is conducted in the presence of a professional. The professional hands the patient the sealed tube, watches the seal broken, the test self-administered, the rube resealed and then handed back to the professional.
I agree.
But I did not understand the point you made about airlines objecting to a more invasive technique being used. To the contrary it is not invasive at all and speeds the process. Singapore is considering adopting it.
But you still need the capacity (machines and specialist) to perform the test on the deep throat salive sample.
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 12, 20, 4:07 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,809
Originally Posted by brunos
To b efair, AA and UA were only planning to restart their operations and decided not to do it.
That's actually not the case. UA has been flying to HKG for a while. However, cargo only without passengers.

Not sure about AA.
garykung is offline  
Old Jul 15, 20, 7:20 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,253
EK has announced that it stops flying to Hong Kong for operational reasons (temporarily till 18 July)
No details have been provided but there can be many reasons:
- HK got very upset with EK when it allowed pax onboard that they should not have allowed.
- Flew large groups (30, 16,..) of infected pax from South Asia.
- Crew is now required to take a test on arrival
- EK must check that pax have a negative test if coming from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, South Africa, the Philippines or Indonesia .

AF, AC, AA and UA stopped flying too. KL added a stopover in BKK on return journey.
Will QR follow through?
brunos is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.