QR retires A380 after 10 years (~2024-2028)
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland
Programs: AY+ Platinum, SK Gold, BAEC Silver, airbaltic VIP, Radisson VIP
Posts: 6,529
QR retires A380 after 10 years (~2024-2028)
Stumbled upon this article:
https://aviationanalyst.co.uk/2019/0...-gulf-carrier/
Sad news, especially because of the bar! Their A380s were delivered between 2014 and 2018 so I would expect them to go between 2024 and 2028.
The plan is to replace them by 777X. This probably means F will go, what do you think?
https://aviationanalyst.co.uk/2019/0...-gulf-carrier/
In an exclusive sit-down interview with Qatar Airways CEO Mr Al Baker in Doha, the State of Qatar, Al Baker told Aviation Analyst that the airline is planning to retire its A380 jets over the coming years. “For the A380s, on the 10thanniversary, we will retire them,” said Al Baker. Qatar Airways first took delivery of their first A380 ‘A7-APA’ in September 2014, and has 10 superjumbos in its fleet, operating to destinations including London Heathrow, Guangzhou, Melbourne and Sydney. “Once we have paid our financial obligations, they will go” he added.
The plan is to replace them by 777X. This probably means F will go, what do you think?
#4
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,251
As a reminder, this is a quote from AAB so the timeline should clearly be taken with a pinch of salt! I would think the priority should be retiring the A340s which make absolutely no sense from an economic perspective.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
As a reminder, this is a quote from AAB so the timeline should clearly be taken with a pinch of salt! I would think the priority should be retiring the A340s which make absolutely no sense from an economic perspective.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
Of course it's just as easy to spread doom and gloom across a scenario
Truth is the A380 hasn't been quite the success that Airbus hoped for. It has worked in some cases for some carriers, but it would seem that for QR it hasn't. Scheduling it on the airline's rather awkward network can't have been easy. The "blockade" won't have made things any easier.
Once financial commitments have been sorted out it probably makes sense to take the opportunity to cut capacity by getting rid of the white elephants, replacing some of them with equipment which better matches demand.
Last edited by IAN-UK; Feb 13, 2019 at 5:18 am Reason: correction of idiocy :)
#9
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 776
Putting it very mildly. The hub spoke model required to fill these fatties might not be dying, but it is certainly decaying. And even if full loads could be achieved, it would still fail to leverage an economy of scales effect as it has a higher CASM than several smaller models. Add to that the exorbitant development costs vs the low sales numers, and you got yourself one gigantic mess. The only feasible use case is for slot constrained airports, but since it requires special treatment like dedicated gates and super category wake turbulence spacing, it cannot even shine in that area.
As a pax I love it, but for airlines it is almost always an inferior choice. As long as pax aren't willing to pay a markup equivalent to the CASM difference, there is basically no business case for it.
As a pax I love it, but for airlines it is almost always an inferior choice. As long as pax aren't willing to pay a markup equivalent to the CASM difference, there is basically no business case for it.
#10
#11
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: SHA,CPH
Programs: SAS EuroBonus Gold, Qatar Privilege Club Gold
Posts: 235
As a reminder, this is a quote from AAB so the timeline should clearly be taken with a pinch of salt! I would think the priority should be retiring the A340s which make absolutely no sense from an economic perspective.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
The issue with the QR A380s seems to be QR isn't able to fill the Y cabin and especially so since the blockade, so QR should take out the Upper Deck Y and possibly F too to create a more J-heavy configuration and then refit them with Qsuites. The whole point of the connector model that QR and EK use is to bunch up departures in connecting banks in the morning and evening to make sure there are as many short layovers as possible, which is exactly why the A380 is a good aircraft for that model. Instead, QR e.g. currently operates 2 LHR flights and 1 LGW flight within 55 minutes of each other in an afternoon, then another 2 LHR flights plus an LGW in a 25 minute window in an evening, with a similar story for early morning departures too. This isn't LHR-NYC, most of those are connecting passengers so it really doesn't make sense for QR to offer more frequency rather than being all A380 to LHR. I also really don't get CAN (there must be some seriously valuable cargo on that route or the local Chinese government is paying QR / some sort of dodgy deal is going on) as I haven't been on an A380 to CAN with enough passengers to even fill a 787 yet. I get the impression QR could make much better use of the A380s they have if they wanted to.
#12
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,251
#13
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: SHA,CPH
Programs: SAS EuroBonus Gold, Qatar Privilege Club Gold
Posts: 235
I think this route is more likely to be as a seasonal route, like the DOH-AKL route. They can swap a 777/787 onto this route during the low season, and 388 on the peak season.
#14
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 776
DXB-AKL is already beyond what the A380 is intended to do, resulting in load constrains. Adding yet another 200 miles on top of that is not helping at all.
#15
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Singapore & Globe trotting
Programs: QR Gold, ITA Club Executive, Hilton Gold, GHA Titanium, Taj Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Gold Elite
Posts: 425
Damn it! Another airline that is dumping the A380. It's sad but that's how the aviation world is developing. Funnily enough, over the years I've flown in all of QR's aircraft types in Y, J and F, barring J in the A380 (and F in their old A340-600). I know it's almost identical to the J found in the B787 and A350 (non-Qsuite version) but still, I would like to fly it!