Awful QF/Jetstar Experience!
#46
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
Well it is painted onto the fuselage right under their name - photo.
3K (Jetstar Asia) - photo.
or
BL (Jetstar Pacific) -
photo.
which are ~49% and ~10% owned by Qantas.
I believe the OP booked on 3K.
Not excusing at all this oversight by 3K but I think bringing the whole Qantas Group thing into it is going a bit too far.
#47
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35
As I said, and I am sorry that you don't understand this, there is no single back end for JQ and QF, especially when it comes to credit card transactions.
In this case davem4 is suggesting to roll back the JQ transaction on the card and in which case QF would be none the wiser. So the OP would get a letter from the bank saying JQ was disputing the information. Not from QF.
In this case davem4 is suggesting to roll back the JQ transaction on the card and in which case QF would be none the wiser. So the OP would get a letter from the bank saying JQ was disputing the information. Not from QF.
As someone who had to initiate disputes against unauthorised charges from qantas, i can assure you that unless the phone agent in the first instance agree to do a refund, it is likely you have to write a few letters.
what you are trying to do is to discredit posts that argue that its QF's fault. From a customer view, it is. QF is the operating carrier. I could be wrong but aren't JQ ticket numbers the same as QF ticket numbers. both may maintain different computer systems but qantas, the group holding and the carrier obviously are responsible for its implementation. And JQ(based on the op's post) did advised the op to seek a refund from qantas.
While you are clearly posting in view of saying its not QF's fault, perhaps you should consider: 1) Qantas set up jetstar Australia. They control its financial and operating decisions. In this case, QF is the operating carrier and reading between the lines of the op, it is quite possible the issue may be due to ticket numbers being missing.
The right thing to do is to refund the "walk-up" charge incurred by the op and recognised the inconvenience caused to him.
From a business view, the group may decide to refund him only the fee charged by jetstar as its likely to be lower and keep the additional revenue. Unless customers start speaking out for themselves collectively, you are only encouraging businesses to charge you as much as they can.
#48
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
Question regarding department of fair trading/small claims etc. Is this purchase actually in any Australian jurisdiction? The original purchase for services was made with Jetstar Asia in Thailand, I assume in THB for travel from BKK-PER-BKK (via SIN and MEL). Feel free to shoot me down if I'm wrong and the ticket was made in two separate transactions.
If for example one bought a ticket LHR-SYD-MEL through BA on BA codes all the way through, with the last sector codeshared on QF obviously, and QF refused carriage SYD-MEL, would the claimant be able to pursue through consumer asssitance channels, BA or QF in Australia or would they need to pursue BA in the UK?
If for example one bought a ticket LHR-SYD-MEL through BA on BA codes all the way through, with the last sector codeshared on QF obviously, and QF refused carriage SYD-MEL, would the claimant be able to pursue through consumer asssitance channels, BA or QF in Australia or would they need to pursue BA in the UK?
#49
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, AU.
Programs: QF. UA. Avis. AMEX.
Posts: 1,558
Ahh well, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. The motivation for my posts is not to defend either JQ or QF or even claim the OP is in the wrong but to explain that if you want to continue to kid yourself that operationally JQ and QF are one and the same then you are setting yourself up for more service issues when something goes wrong. You cannot take the expectations and experience from one airline and apply it to another, even if the first airline owns the second, especially when they are operated as stand alone businesses.
You can kick and scream about JQ all you like but it doesn't change the fact that they are here to stay, they will continue to take over routes QF cannot operate effectively as mainline routes and when things go well, they are actually a very good airline. When things don't go well, then you are generally stuffed as you are with any LCC.
I accept that there is nothing I can post on a public forum which will change the point of view of many here who want to have their cake and eat it as well (have a low fare airline but offers full service, or want a full service carrier and would prefer to see that carrier loose money on leisure routes). If you want to continue that point of view you are only setting yourself up for issues when something does go wrong.
So yes, the OP was screwed but not by QF as QF is not responsible for JQ/ 3K ticketing and if QF didn't think they had been paid for the codeshare sector then they are entitled under a commercial agreement to deny boarding. This is something that has to be taken up with the point of sale airline, which is going to be either JQ or 3K (I would look at said credit card statement to see who the billing merchant is). Regardless of what a JQ agent in Melbourne says this from the OP perspective has nothing to do with QF.
You can stuff around with chargebacks, fair trading, and QF until the cows come home but the right people to deal with this are either 3K or JQ depending on who did the ticketing.
So please, continue the pointless QF/ JQ bashing as it changes nothing, especially for JQ who seem to have no issues in turning a small profit in these times. From what I hear DJ is no better and Tiger is worse (speaking of Tiger, based on the thoughts in this thread everyone who has been done over by a Tiger cancellation or time change should be claiming refunds from Singapore Airlines).
Short of sending everyone on work experience at JQ and QF I am not sure what else (I doubt anything) could be done to demonstrate the level of operational seperation between the two companies. I have tried to help, you won't believe me so I will retreat and leave you no better off than you were before. Makes the whole purpose of FT pointless though doesnt it?
You can kick and scream about JQ all you like but it doesn't change the fact that they are here to stay, they will continue to take over routes QF cannot operate effectively as mainline routes and when things go well, they are actually a very good airline. When things don't go well, then you are generally stuffed as you are with any LCC.
I accept that there is nothing I can post on a public forum which will change the point of view of many here who want to have their cake and eat it as well (have a low fare airline but offers full service, or want a full service carrier and would prefer to see that carrier loose money on leisure routes). If you want to continue that point of view you are only setting yourself up for issues when something does go wrong.
So yes, the OP was screwed but not by QF as QF is not responsible for JQ/ 3K ticketing and if QF didn't think they had been paid for the codeshare sector then they are entitled under a commercial agreement to deny boarding. This is something that has to be taken up with the point of sale airline, which is going to be either JQ or 3K (I would look at said credit card statement to see who the billing merchant is). Regardless of what a JQ agent in Melbourne says this from the OP perspective has nothing to do with QF.
You can stuff around with chargebacks, fair trading, and QF until the cows come home but the right people to deal with this are either 3K or JQ depending on who did the ticketing.
So please, continue the pointless QF/ JQ bashing as it changes nothing, especially for JQ who seem to have no issues in turning a small profit in these times. From what I hear DJ is no better and Tiger is worse (speaking of Tiger, based on the thoughts in this thread everyone who has been done over by a Tiger cancellation or time change should be claiming refunds from Singapore Airlines).
Short of sending everyone on work experience at JQ and QF I am not sure what else (I doubt anything) could be done to demonstrate the level of operational seperation between the two companies. I have tried to help, you won't believe me so I will retreat and leave you no better off than you were before. Makes the whole purpose of FT pointless though doesnt it?
#50
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847