![]() |
How Reliable is the A380?
We are booked LAX-SYD later this month. How often does Qantas have to substitute a 744 for the A380?
|
So far it has been running to schedule, with a couple of addition MEL-LAX-SYD legs thrown in on [Tue/Wed] from now.
|
Exceptionally reliable, according to my information - AFAIK, it hasn't missed a scheduled flight (yet).
Dave |
100% reliability from what I have seen as well!
|
Originally Posted by AlwaysOnTheRoad
(Post 10873391)
We are booked LAX-SYD later this month. How often does Qantas have to substitute a 744 for the A380?
|
Originally Posted by Mark345
(Post 10874370)
From what I've read the 380 has had the smoothest entry into service - forget about delivery!- of any plane in recent memory. Airbus have, i believe, been touting that even SQ were delighted, a rare occurrence in aviation circles
|
While I'm very happy to hear the whalejet has been reliable (I'm on QF94 a week from today), SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass. Granted I should bite my tounge. Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.
|
Originally Posted by CoachBoy
(Post 10876088)
...Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF...
|
Originally Posted by CoachBoy
(Post 10876088)
SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass.
Originally Posted by CoachBoy
(Post 10876088)
Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.
Of course I am excluding the last two Qantas incidents, and while the final report is not in for both of these, it APPEARS that QF was not a fault. Anyways back to topic, EK had a problem with their A380 the other day "Engineers at Emirates are investigating the cause of the glitch aboard the 489-seat superjumbo, in which passengers were left without reading lights and the digital entertainment system. “This disruption led to a compromised level of passenger comfort and as a result, a decision was made for the aircraft to return to Dubai,” an Emirates spokeswoman said." http://www.thenational.ae/article/20...835/0/NATIONAL |
Originally Posted by CoachBoy
(Post 10876088)
While I'm very happy to hear the whalejet has been reliable (I'm on QF94 a week from today), SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass. Granted I should bite my tounge. Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.
|
Originally Posted by Mark345
(Post 10874370)
From what I've read the 380 has had the smoothest entry into service - forget about delivery!- of any plane in recent memory. Airbus have, i believe, been touting that even SQ were delighted, a rare occurrence in aviation circles
|
Over the top
Originally Posted by Lonely Flyer
(Post 10876074)
Yet SQ's Bird 1 is always breaking down as I have personally experienced.
And of course SQ checked the aeroplane out fully after it put some wheels on the grass, as any safety-conscious airline would. And as to speculation about what QF would do (although they don't seem to have had much choice in this case...): :o http://www.theage.com.au/travel/anot...1209-6ua2.html Oops |
Didn't EK engineers accidentally put their first A380 out of service for a week or so?
Oh QF should be replacing an engine soon, no airline likes to have all the engines on the same number of hours / cycles. |
|
Originally Posted by Blackcloud
(Post 10877331)
Didn't EK engineers accidentally put their first A380 out of service for a week or so?
Oh QF should be replacing an engine soon, no airline likes to have all the engines on the same number of hours / cycles. Lonely flyer, what about my programs causes such shock? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.