FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Qantas | Frequent Flyer (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/qantas-frequent-flyer-498/)
-   -   How Reliable is the A380? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/qantas-frequent-flyer/896816-how-reliable-a380.html)

AlwaysOnTheRoad Dec 8, 2008 4:59 am

How Reliable is the A380?
 
We are booked LAX-SYD later this month. How often does Qantas have to substitute a 744 for the A380?

moa999 Dec 8, 2008 5:05 am

So far it has been running to schedule, with a couple of addition MEL-LAX-SYD legs thrown in on [Tue/Wed] from now.

thadocta Dec 8, 2008 5:14 am

Exceptionally reliable, according to my information - AFAIK, it hasn't missed a scheduled flight (yet).

Dave

AndDee Dec 8, 2008 5:53 am

100% reliability from what I have seen as well!

Mark345 Dec 8, 2008 9:18 am


Originally Posted by AlwaysOnTheRoad (Post 10873391)
We are booked LAX-SYD later this month. How often does Qantas have to substitute a 744 for the A380?

From what I've read the 380 has had the smoothest entry into service - forget about delivery!- of any plane in recent memory. Airbus have, i believe, been touting that even SQ were delighted, a rare occurrence in aviation circles

Lonely Flyer Dec 8, 2008 1:36 pm


Originally Posted by Mark345 (Post 10874370)
From what I've read the 380 has had the smoothest entry into service - forget about delivery!- of any plane in recent memory. Airbus have, i believe, been touting that even SQ were delighted, a rare occurrence in aviation circles

Yet SQ's Bird 1 is always breaking down as I have personally experienced.

TravelBuddha Dec 8, 2008 1:38 pm

While I'm very happy to hear the whalejet has been reliable (I'm on QF94 a week from today), SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass. Granted I should bite my tounge. Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.

og Dec 8, 2008 2:11 pm


Originally Posted by CoachBoy (Post 10876088)
...Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF...

So I can assume then that nobody in EK or SQ would do such a thing? And I suppose SQ would never try to take off from the wrong runway (in TPE) - but that wasn't a 380. :rolleyes:

AndDee Dec 8, 2008 2:18 pm


Originally Posted by CoachBoy (Post 10876088)
SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass.

:rolleyes: Yes if it was a 777/744 or a QF bird they would have just towed her back to gate, loaded her up and let her take off wouldn't they :rolleyes:


Originally Posted by CoachBoy (Post 10876088)
Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.

If you mean based on the media bashing of QF on an almost daily basis then yes QF does come up more. I am glad that the new CEO has had a few words to say about this ^

Of course I am excluding the last two Qantas incidents, and while the final report is not in for both of these, it APPEARS that QF was not a fault.

Anyways back to topic, EK had a problem with their A380 the other day

"Engineers at Emirates are investigating the cause of the glitch aboard the 489-seat superjumbo, in which passengers were left without reading lights and the digital entertainment system. “This disruption led to a compromised level of passenger comfort and as a result, a decision was made for the aircraft to return to Dubai,” an Emirates spokeswoman said."

http://www.thenational.ae/article/20...835/0/NATIONAL

Lonely Flyer Dec 8, 2008 2:29 pm


Originally Posted by CoachBoy (Post 10876088)
While I'm very happy to hear the whalejet has been reliable (I'm on QF94 a week from today), SQ was treating theirs like a newborn child at first. They pulled it from service and gave it a full check when a pilot cut a taxiway corner short and accidentally put some of the rear wheels on the grass. Granted I should bite my tounge. Based on current record, if anyone was going to do something injurious to a 380 on the ground (other than an airbus crew leaving a toolbox in the avionics bay) it will be QF. Also, if it was Air India and PIA, rather than SQ and QF, being the first in service, I would be far more impressed with the A/C's resilience.

I only need to look at your programs to say "Oh my God......"

perthite Dec 8, 2008 4:10 pm


Originally Posted by Mark345 (Post 10874370)
From what I've read the 380 has had the smoothest entry into service - forget about delivery!- of any plane in recent memory. Airbus have, i believe, been touting that even SQ were delighted, a rare occurrence in aviation circles

They did have a plane flying around during the delay, so they had plenty of time to work on any kinks.

tallboy Dec 8, 2008 4:25 pm

Over the top
 

Originally Posted by Lonely Flyer (Post 10876074)
Yet SQ's Bird 1 is always breaking down as I have personally experienced.

I think this may be a slight exaggeration. I know several management pilots at SQ, including those on the A380 fleet, and as of a recent visit they are still very happy with the reliability of the new aeroplanes. Of course there are occasional out-of-service problems, but so far, after more than 12 months in-service and with six aircraft now operating, they are indeed pleased with a/c reliability. As mentioned above, the A380 has had a very smooth introduction to service compared with most new a/c types.

And of course SQ checked the aeroplane out fully after it put some wheels on the grass, as any safety-conscious airline would.

And as to speculation about what QF would do (although they don't seem to have had much choice in this case...): :o

http://www.theage.com.au/travel/anot...1209-6ua2.html

Oops

Blackcloud Dec 8, 2008 5:18 pm

Didn't EK engineers accidentally put their first A380 out of service for a week or so?
Oh QF should be replacing an engine soon, no airline likes to have all the engines on the same number of hours / cycles.

Lonely Flyer Dec 8, 2008 5:38 pm

Hopefully Etihad do not get a new A380

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=388164

TravelBuddha Dec 8, 2008 8:27 pm


Originally Posted by Blackcloud (Post 10877331)
Didn't EK engineers accidentally put their first A380 out of service for a week or so?
Oh QF should be replacing an engine soon, no airline likes to have all the engines on the same number of hours / cycles.

The EK 380 was out of service due tot he toolbox being left in the avionics bay by Airbus techs and causing massive amounts of FOD.

Lonely flyer, what about my programs causes such shock?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.