Virgin challenges Qantas on US route
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
Originally Posted by number_6
Obviously all twins need ETOPS rating of 180 or 207 for trans-pacific use, but hasn't UA operated 777s on SFO-SYD already (or is it only ex-LAX?). I haven't checked the charts but would think the ETOPS routing out of SFO and LAX is pretty much identical.
UA did run 777 to AKL IIRC til they stopped the service a couple years back.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
Originally Posted by number_6
As for 744s stacked up in the AZ desert, is this really true?
There is a hot market for 744s that are still flyable right now (both for freighter conversion and for pax use), with several airlines having stated that they simply cannot find any used ones "in good condition and at a good price".
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/U...tored-b747.htm
As I posted 4 x UA livery 747/400 (long sold by lease holders) have been getting a desert suntan there for years now.
airliners.net has photos of all the 747s gathering dust there if anyone is interested.
#18
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
fwiw, Boeing has recently booked 16 unidentified 787 orders. Maybe related, maybe not. Seems some airlines are wanting order positions without tipping their hand.
#19
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
Originally Posted by ozstamps
You bet. Victorville (VCV) is the place to go looking.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/U...tored-b747.htm
As I posted 4 x UA livery 747/400 (long sold by lease holders) have been getting a desert suntan there for years now.
airliners.net has photos of all the 747s gathering dust there if anyone is interested.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/U...tored-b747.htm
As I posted 4 x UA livery 747/400 (long sold by lease holders) have been getting a desert suntan there for years now.
airliners.net has photos of all the 747s gathering dust there if anyone is interested.
I expect part of the reason DJ is not currently operating the route is the logistics of sourcing the correct aircraft type and crews etc.
Of course one option is for Virgin Blue to operate VS aircraft under a wet lease agreement using the Pacific Blue brand. As has been noted previously, Virgin Blue is unable to use the "Virgin" name for operations outside Australia and hence the use of Pacific Blue for their regional international flights. But I expect the Pacific Blue name could be used by Virgin Blue to operate current VS aircraft such as the A340-600 they fly LHR-HKG-SYD, in VS colours using a DJ flight number with VS codeshares.
#20
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Originally Posted by NM
But I expect the Pacific Blue name could be used by Virgin Blue to operate current VS aircraft such as the A340-600 they fly LHR-HKG-SYD, in VS colours using a DJ flight number with VS codeshares.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
Originally Posted by NM
But I expect the Pacific Blue name could be used by Virgin Blue to operate current VS aircraft such as the A340-600 they fly LHR-HKG-SYD, in VS colours using a DJ flight number with VS codeshares.
#22
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SYD and (sometimes) MEL
Programs: QP Silver; CX MPC Green; Virgin AusRed
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Are you stating that DJ operates the 346 flight from LHR to SYD (via HKG)?
I think what NM was suggesting that Pacific Blue (or whatever the new entity is called) can use VS's aircraft and operate OZ-US with its own designator (or DJ) with VS 'sharing' the flight.
#23
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Originally Posted by RickyT
No, no. VS (Virgin Altantic) operates the LHR->HKG->SYD flights with no codesharing with DJ or other airlines.
I think what NM was suggesting that Pacific Blue (or whatever the new entity is called) can use VS's aircraft and operate OZ-US with its own designator (or DJ) with VS 'sharing' the flight.
I think what NM was suggesting that Pacific Blue (or whatever the new entity is called) can use VS's aircraft and operate OZ-US with its own designator (or DJ) with VS 'sharing' the flight.
Now a "wet lease" is another matter entirely, there is nothing to stop VS from wet leasing (or even damp leasing) an aircraft to DJ to enable DJ to commence services.
Dave
#24
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Originally Posted by thadocta
I doubt that VS would be allowed to place their code on the flight. Codeshares are normally subject to the same traffic restrictions as normal flights, and since VS do not have traffic rights AU-US, they do not have the ability to codeshare on these flights.
Last edited by Traveloguy; Sep 25, 2006 at 1:28 pm
#25
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Are you sure about that? Remember both AA and BA codeshare on intra-Oz flights yet neither have applied for nor been granted intra-Australian traffic rights. UA also codeshares on DJ flights, howver I do remember when they were granted temporary intra-Australian traffic rights during the AN crisis.
Quite a while back (when QF and NZ were codesharing last time around) QF operated SYD-LAX-SFO, and the NZ (might have still been TE then) code was placed on the SYD-LAX flight, but could not be placed on the LAX-SFO sector as NZ did not (at that stage) have traffic rights to SFO.
Dave
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by thadocta
Now a "wet lease" is another matter entirely, there is nothing to stop VS from wet leasing (or even damp leasing) an aircraft to DJ to enable DJ to commence services.
#29
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Programs: Virgin Australia Velocity Gold
Posts: 1,425
I'm guessing Virgin Blue will create a new entity purely for American and Asian operations. I've heard the name "Planet Blue" has been thrown around, although not entirely sure this would be used. Nevertheless, the name is very catchy.
I doubt they'd use the Pacific Blue brand, as it would likely cause confusion, especially having a full service operation to the United States/Asia and a LCC (well NWC) operation trans-Tasman and into the Pacific Islands. I can see a new entity being created here as I'm sure they'd like to differentiate their product.
The leasing solution sounds plausible and would allow for Virgin Blue to commence operations sooner. A damp lease would be good, as the lessee in this case, Virgin Blue, would use their own Cabin Crew and would lease aircraft (A346/744) from the lessor, Virgin Atlantic (although, I'm not 100% sure on how operations like this function and their restrictions, so don't flame or bite me).
I wouldn't be surprised if we see a mid-2007 commencement of services, although this could likely be delayed by a number of reasons.
IIRC, Virgin Blue's (Pilots) EBA results should be out soon (may already be out), so I'd imagine that may give some clues as to the nature/technical aspect of this new operation.
Hopefully we'll hear something soon. Be nice to have a large Embraer order and US operations announced at the same time!
Cheers
(grr to database errors )
I doubt they'd use the Pacific Blue brand, as it would likely cause confusion, especially having a full service operation to the United States/Asia and a LCC (well NWC) operation trans-Tasman and into the Pacific Islands. I can see a new entity being created here as I'm sure they'd like to differentiate their product.
The leasing solution sounds plausible and would allow for Virgin Blue to commence operations sooner. A damp lease would be good, as the lessee in this case, Virgin Blue, would use their own Cabin Crew and would lease aircraft (A346/744) from the lessor, Virgin Atlantic (although, I'm not 100% sure on how operations like this function and their restrictions, so don't flame or bite me).
I wouldn't be surprised if we see a mid-2007 commencement of services, although this could likely be delayed by a number of reasons.
IIRC, Virgin Blue's (Pilots) EBA results should be out soon (may already be out), so I'd imagine that may give some clues as to the nature/technical aspect of this new operation.
Hopefully we'll hear something soon. Be nice to have a large Embraer order and US operations announced at the same time!
Cheers
(grr to database errors )
#30
Join Date: Aug 2001
Programs: AA Plat & LTG; QF LTG
Posts: 9,837
Originally Posted by RickyT
No, no. VS (Virgin Altantic) operates the LHR->HKG->SYD flights with no codesharing with DJ or other airlines.
I think what NM was suggesting that Pacific Blue (or whatever the new entity is called) can use VS's aircraft and operate OZ-US with its own designator (or DJ) with VS 'sharing' the flight.
I think what NM was suggesting that Pacific Blue (or whatever the new entity is called) can use VS's aircraft and operate OZ-US with its own designator (or DJ) with VS 'sharing' the flight.