FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Qantas | Frequent Flyer (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/qantas-frequent-flyer-498/)
-   -   QF10 Tail-Strike 9/2/2020 [9 Feb 2020] (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/qantas-frequent-flyer/2008220-qf10-tail-strike-9-2-2020-9-feb-2020-a.html)

xtra1 Feb 9, 2020 6:26 am

QF10 Tail-Strike 9/2/2020 [9 Feb 2020]
 
QF 10, 787. LHR-PER; allegedly suffered a tail-strike at departure from LHR..during Storm Ciara. Circling and returning to LHR now.

Garimi Feb 9, 2020 6:38 am


Originally Posted by xtra1 (Post 32050748)
QF 10, 787. LHR-PER; allegedly suffered a tail-strike at departure from LHR..during Storm Ciara. Circling and returning to LHR now.

I wanted to start thread about it...just notice on flight radar big circles wonder how much fuel it must burn....or just started dropping...

Garimi Feb 9, 2020 6:40 am

It will be costly for airline full flight and long time to clear back log...

Dave_C Feb 9, 2020 7:46 am

Also interesting to see how difficult it is to repair the composites in the fuselage. From what I recall when then Ethiopian 787 had a battery fire at Heathrow, it was out of action for months whilst they worked out how to repair it.

gaz82 Feb 9, 2020 9:07 am

I have a family member on this flight. Apparently the Captain told the passengers that there was an issue with one of the engines. The flight has now been cancelled.

MSPeconomist Feb 9, 2020 2:45 pm

A tail strike shouldn't normally impact an engine.

og Feb 9, 2020 3:41 pm


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 32052457)
A tail strike shouldn't normally impact an engine.

Probably the shortest possible commentary from the Captain rather than saying “tail strike” and explaining what it was and the implications. I assume the crew had too much workload to go through any more than minimal cabin announcements.

mb86 Feb 9, 2020 4:30 pm

Also had a family member on the flight. They spoke to ground crew after landing (and sorting out their replacement flight) and they said that when the flight took off a gust of wind lifted the plane more than expected, and that was when the tail strike occurred. After they had returned to Heathrow the tail was inspected and was fine. However, the weight of the plane due to the amount of fuel (despite fuel dumping) meant that the landing was extremely hard, and that they needed to make sure the landing gear was okay. This is why the flight was cancelled.

m0hamed Feb 9, 2020 4:33 pm

https://www.australianfrequentflyer..../#post-2061852

Globaliser Feb 11, 2020 6:48 am

VH-ZND is now operating today's QF10 (11 February), so all is well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:24 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.