More 787s and bye bye 747 by 2020
#17
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
I'd say it's pretty limited. Not many incidents where a plane could fly for 2hrs but not for 6hrs.
SA has recently been operating a 332 under ETOPS240 for PER-JNB, and LA is closing on 2yrs operating 788/789 on SCL-AKL-SYD
SA has recently been operating a 332 under ETOPS240 for PER-JNB, and LA is closing on 2yrs operating 788/789 on SCL-AKL-SYD
#18
#20
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Programs: QF Gold, VA Plat, IHG Plat Amb, LCAH Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,846
And then there are those RR engines on some of the 787 fleet. Big question mark whether they could complete an ETOPS diversion on one engine.
#21
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
I thought so too until last week when i flew 787 in J and was surprised at all sorts of little problems that make J less pleasant than I expected from the specs. Some vibration in my J seat, for example (source unknown) but very surprising. Haven't felt that on other airlines 787s, so presume to do with the QF J seat. Bottom line is great idea but poor execution, hopefully to be improved pronto by QF. Didn't see the Y and PE cabin, much less try it out, so can't comment on that but 3x3x3 seating has its fans and its opponents. Personally I think 2x4x3 is better if you go for such density and plane was originally expected to be 8 across in Y by Boeing but 9 across is becoming the norm.
#22
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
#23