Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Load factors DFW-SYD/BNE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2013, 8:38 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 398
Load factors DFW-SYD/BNE?

I am sitting in the boarding area for tonight's DFW-BNE flight, waiting for a flight at the adjacent gate. I just counted the passengers in the boarding area, and there are fewer than 100 waiting to board the Qantas 747... Is this load factor typical for this flight? If so, yikes! That's a nearly empty plane!

Take care,
Saunders111
saunders111 is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 8:39 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SJC/VCE
Programs: AA PLT (2.9+ MM), HH GLD, Hyatt Diamond, SPG PLT
Posts: 10,161
I would assume that there are many pax in the lounge, rather than the seating area.
bdemaria is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 8:43 pm
  #3  
HNL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,949
Originally Posted by bdemaria
I would assume that there are many pax in the lounge, rather than the seating area.
or the many bars and restaurants in T-D. If I was about to bord a 12-14 houtr flight I would not be siting in the gate area for an hour, I would time my arrival at the gate to the very last minute before the doors close.
HNL is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 9:40 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Programs: Airline nobody. Sad!
Posts: 26,062
Since tonight's flight has already left (I keep forgetting it is only 7:41PM where I am right now ), I can't dig it up on EF. However, tomorrow's flight only shows Y6. Thursday shows Y7 (QF will show a max of 9, so any less means that is actually the number of seats they are willing to sell at full Y). Also likewise, I'd be far away from the gate, partaking of terminal D's establishments. If that boarding door closes at T-15, I'm aiming for T-16 before a flight of that length if in Y.

This also may make more sense to be in the Qantas forum.
TheBOSman is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 9:45 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SFO
Posts: 335
I have heard from people within the industry that QF's DFW service is very successful - full flights and heavy loads in the premium cabin. As others have said, I would be in the lounge until boarding time if I were taking a long haul flight. QF dumped SFO (which did well) for DFW, and from what I have been told, they have no regrets about that.
VXCabinCrew is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 9:47 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
There is a limit of how many economy seats that Qantas can sell on that flight iirc due to weight restrictions, so good option for economy at a gamble for an empty seat

I doubt that many of the business class passengers were hanging out by the gate and that is a fair number of passengers. There are only 275 economy seats on the aeroplane , so 100 is at least a third of the number that can be taken
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 10:04 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
Can I suggest that this thread is moved to the QF forum? it seems to be more relevant there than on the AA board!
hillrider is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 10:27 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Programs: UA Plat, Hilton ◆
Posts: 89
I fly DFW-BNE & SYD-DFW a lot. I'm usually in premium economy, but from what I can see considering all three cabins it usually is 85%+ occupied. Especially the last several months, it's always been very full.

Not that my flying is a statistically significant sample...
anotherlad is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2013, 11:11 pm
  #9  
Senior Moderator and Moderator: American AAdvantage & TravelBuzz
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 10,417
As this query is about QF flight loads and not related to AA, we'll move this over to the Qantas forum for further discussion. Thanks! /JY1024, AA forum co-moderator
JY1024 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2013, 7:34 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Programs: QF Platinum
Posts: 361
The loads to from DXB are so full at times QF have had to divert on return (due to head winds) to get more fuel.
Limewood is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2013, 9:34 pm
  #11  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted by Limewood
The loads to from DXB are so full at times QF have had to divert on return (due to head winds) to get more fuel.
DXB or DFW?
og is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2013, 9:51 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Programs: QF Platinum
Posts: 361
Originally Posted by og
DXB or DFW?
oops been looking up DXB have it on mind, correct DFW return of course.
Limewood is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2013, 9:36 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LON
Programs: QF Plat & LTG, VA Plat
Posts: 1,435
Friends taking this flight recently have said it's been rammed in economy every time, very few empty seats. The route seems to be doing well for QF. Majority of people connecting onto AA of course.
justin_krusty is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2013, 10:43 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Programs: Airline nobody. Sad!
Posts: 26,062
Originally Posted by justin_krusty
Friends taking this flight recently have said it's been rammed in economy every time, very few empty seats. The route seems to be doing well for QF. Majority of people connecting onto AA of course.
It does seem to be a better option if flying economy in a way. I would rather connect at DFW than LAX as a general rule every day of the week (especially when arriving in the USA), and AA has many more services to many more airports/markets than from LAX. The A380 would likely be better in economy than the 747, but both flights are long affairs (and I just flew SQ 21 a couple of days ago, I have some inkling about long flights ). In my mind if flying economy, I want to get from point A to point B as absolutely quickly and painlessly as I possibly can. DFW works better than LAX for almost all origins east of the Rocky Mountains in this regard for sure.
TheBOSman is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2013, 11:15 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 103
Originally Posted by TheBOSman
It does seem to be a better option if flying economy in a way. I would rather connect at DFW than LAX as a general rule every day of the week (especially when arriving in the USA), and AA has many more services to many more airports/markets than from LAX. The A380 would likely be better in economy than the 747, but both flights are long affairs (and I just flew SQ 21 a couple of days ago, I have some inkling about long flights ). In my mind if flying economy, I want to get from point A to point B as absolutely quickly and painlessly as I possibly can. DFW works better than LAX for almost all origins east of the Rocky Mountains in this regard for sure.
I agree, with JFK being an exception. In economy, I'd rather take QF LAX-JFK than AA DFW-JFK.
levelnine is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.