Community
Wiki Posts
Search

QF PE is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2010, 2:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 44
QF PE is it worth it?

Hi Im going to book some flights to Sydney soon and wanted to know if anyone had any feedback about QF PE service especially on A380. Is it worth the extra cost over Y.
Whats the benefits over Y, I actually enjoyed my last QF experience in Y ( hard to believe I know) but was great.


If not might stick with EK Y service out of MAN via DXB rather than trawl LHR.

CHEERS
cinderwold is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 2:46 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OOL Australia
Programs: QFF (Gold), Skywards, Rapid Rewards,United, Velocity, Hilton Silver
Posts: 2,440
Originally Posted by cinderwold
rather than trawl LHR.
CHEERS
That could be illegal.
Lonely Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 3:08 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 188
Short answer = No

IMHO it's not worth it. Tried QF & BA PE recently. QF seat is marginally better, food options are significantly improved. QF PE is streets ahead of BA PE. Overall experience would depend on your ability to snag a reasonably good seat in QF Y though.
ollieinmelbourne is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 3:38 pm
  #4  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
I have yet to sit in the QF PE seat, but the move from a BA WT seat to their WT+ seat was a life changing experience - liberating me from 31" of space to something more civilised. Never again down the back.

So, if the budget can cope, and since QF PE is regarded as better than BA WT+, the only option is YES.
og is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 3:42 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
A Vote for Yes

I think it is worth it on the A380.
I thought the seats, food and service on the A380 PE was excellent and could not complain about them.
Of course I could complain about the price and I am sure some may suggest looking at other airlines discount business class to see if there is a similar price for QF PE.
Blackcloud is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 3:57 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BNE, Australia...not too far from the nearest Qantas Pub err Club
Posts: 3,636
More discussion here on the same subject...

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/qanta...orth-cost.html
willyroo is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 4:02 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
I have never flown PE on QF but my answer would be "no". Why? For GBP 2500 you can fly business class on a good Star Alliance carrier and get a much better product, more miles and better service.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 5:26 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jersey, CI
Posts: 1,094
Originally Posted by og
I have yet to sit in the QF PE seat, but the move from a BA WT seat to their WT+ seat was a life changing experience - liberating me from 31" of space to something more civilised. Never again down the back.

So, if the budget can cope, and since QF PE is regarded as better than BA WT+, the only option is YES.
Couldn't agree more. QF's Y+ is over-priced that's true, but now i've been in it 4-5 times the thought of going further down the back of the bus is not a nice one (OK it wasn't before I sat in Y+). Being 6'4" the extra leg room is brilliant. I have done SYD-SFO in it a few times, and for a 14 hour flight it made the difference between a nightmare and a comfortable flight.
drewbles is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2010, 7:42 pm
  #9  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by drewbles
Couldn't agree more. QF's Y+ is over-priced that's true, but now i've been in it 4-5 times the thought of going further down the back of the bus is not a nice one (OK it wasn't before I sat in Y+). Being 6'4" the extra leg room is brilliant. I have done SYD-SFO in it a few times, and for a 14 hour flight it made the difference between a nightmare and a comfortable flight.
A random search on QF.com showed prices of almost GBP 3000 for a return LHR-SYD in PE. For less money you can fly a good business class on another carrier. The only reason why someone would do this is because you need the QF SCs or points.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2010, 3:36 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: country Western Australia
Programs: QF SG(LTS) - AA LTG(1MM)
Posts: 2,771
But then there are occasional sales - most notably exHKG. Sometimes the premium (which I THINK QF keeps insisting be raised) on a LONEx seqment is worth the splurge. If the price is with a few $$ of a H/B class Y seat I would consider it. But then the AA program values the flying of long haul premium seat segments differently from BA and QF.

I suspect in May I will actually be in a Y+ seat (SYD-HKG) for the first time. That will be the fifth Y+ ticketed segment

Considering a wander or two......

Fred
wandering_fred is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2010, 10:52 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Programs: QF WP, QF LTG, PC Plat, FlyingBlue
Posts: 24
The cost of PE is double Y fare and the value is not there. If you must do it then the 380 experience is definitely better than the 747. I have done both as well as BA WT+ (no comparison). But you could get a J fare on another airline for the same as PE.

If you are flying out of MAN then its best to avoid LHR and fly direct via DXB.
biba is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2010, 4:26 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: DOH / SYD
Programs: QF / QR WP, VA plat, SQ*G, HH diamond
Posts: 41
If you are flying out of MAN then its best to avoid LHR and fly direct via DXB.[/QUOTE]

Or the new MAN - MUC - SIN SQ 777W service, just started this week, still better than via LHR IMO, and excellent product even down the back.
SimonSyd is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2010, 9:17 pm
  #13  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Isn't EK Y significantly less comfortable than QF Y? As in smaller seat and less leg room compared to 744 and far worse than A380 Y (which is the best Y in the world). MAN gets the worse EK planes, unlike LHR, which further exacerbates the situation.

Some other advantages of routing via LHR are the much better duty free shopping at LHR, and the better departure lounges. So it isn't all bad routing that way. Think I'd rather go QF MAN-LHR-SIN on A380 than SQ MAN-MUC-SIN unless SQ starts flying their A380s to MAN (obviously that will never happen except when LHR is closed).

As for the high price of PE on QF, obviously QF is able to get that big of a premium as it is a better product than PE on BA, VS etc. and worth it for some. I'd say bigger difference on 744 than A380, though (Y is too good on the A380).

Update: just read that EK will be flying A380 MAN-DXB starting Sept 1 2010 (and of course there already is A380 service DXB-SYD). Quite a coup for MAN to get this service, and this would seem to make EK the preferred choice ex-MAN.

Last edited by number_6; Apr 3, 2010 at 2:22 am Reason: EK flying A380
number_6 is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2010, 5:14 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,403
Originally Posted by number_6
Isn't EK Y significantly less comfortable than QF Y? As in smaller seat and less leg room compared to 744 and far worse than A380 Y (which is the best Y in the world).
Yes and no. The 777s have the nasty 10 across seating, BUT, the trade-off is a 34' pitch.

regarding other comments about PE value, i remember scratching out some calculations when PE was first introduced and the extra seat width + legroom gave a total seating space of double a normal economy seat. So on that basis charging double seemed about right. Then you get all the added bonuses such as check-in and biz wines etc. (I think I compared the total seats in the small 747 economy cabin before and after the introduction on PE.)

however - nice as QF PE is, there are fares ex London in bizzo class on other airlines (for less than QF PE) which would be much more comfortable.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Apr 4, 2010, 6:44 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, AU
Programs: QF WP, Velocity WP, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 41
PE is, from my experience, worth it when Qantas has their Premium Economy Sale fares available. Currently, they're available from SFO/LAX to Oz at about $US2.2K return, but not if you're originating from Oz.

You have to pay almost twice as much as if you're a Australian-based flyer for the same seat...

At this price, I would suggest you look for an alternative.
ivanhoe is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.