Rumoured FIRST reductions
#46
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Isn't the 13th A380 being delivered in 2012? Not sure any config decisions are meaningful that far ahead -- remember how QF's first A380 was to be 555 seats? And then 505? With 450 on the delivered product. The forces the drove is down by 20% of capacity could reassert themselves by then
#47
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,121
Isn't the 13th A380 being delivered in 2012? Not sure any config decisions are meaningful that far ahead -- remember how QF's first A380 was to be 555 seats? And then 505? With 450 on the delivered product. The forces the drove is down by 20% of capacity could reassert themselves by then
#48
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LHR
Programs: BAEC GGL & CCR / QF LTG
Posts: 829
#49
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
But chances are the 744 fleet won't go F-less within the next 12 months, though I suppose some may be holding tickets that won't be used for 23 months from now.
#50
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LHR
Programs: BAEC GGL & CCR / QF LTG
Posts: 829
Jase.
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
I have been booked and confirmed into A (QF 127 SYD-HKG) and then a 333 was subbed for the 744. QF at check-in gave a voucher for the issuing agent verifying the invol downgrade to D and said it was up to the issuing agent to arrange a refund. CX declined to offer any compensation. On correspondence with QF on the CX refusal, QF gave an adjustment to the FF points and SCs for the flight as if it had operated in F.
#52
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: QF Platinum & Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,340
You can understand QF's rationale in making the (proposed) decision to reduce F capacity. Part of this would of course be to due to recent events in the economy, but part of this is due to J becoming so good. With lie flat beds on the QF A380, and lie flat beds on CX J and good food & beverage and IFE options on both carriers it is really hard to justify paying two or three times the going J rate to fly F.
#57
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
F can be removed without refitting the seats. As they are already doing on some routes, using better seat with the lower class of service.
#58
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
#59
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
I think another problem is the fact that the A380 F suites may not fit in Zone A of a 747 leaving an economically viable F class. Didn't CX reduce their F from 12 to 9 seats?
QF must have decided that having two different product offerings in F and J on the A380 and 747 would damage the brand.
As for the remaining 8 A380, I think there will not be an F but expanded Y and PE.
QF must have decided that having two different product offerings in F and J on the A380 and 747 would damage the brand.
As for the remaining 8 A380, I think there will not be an F but expanded Y and PE.
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,993
Qantas have dealt with such downgrade issues before with set compensation rates:
http://www.qantas.com.au/agents/dyn/qf/news/200809/0947
http://www.qantas.com.au/agents/dyn/qf/news/200809/0947