Ronnie, many of the people posting to this thread listed serious responses to that question. Perhaps if you would bother to read some of those responses you might learn something. We aren't anti security. We are, for the most part anti poorly implemented policies from an out of control, answerable to no one agency.

This is probably just another one of Ronnie's pigeon posts. He doesn't read the thread; he just reads the title. Then he flys by, leaves droppings on the floor, and keeps on going.

Pigeon post? Snort, coffee running out of nose, hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Pretty funny that we can list what it would take for acceptance of TSA and a TSA employee (perhaps) ignores what was posted. Typical.

That's because Ronny is a self proclaimed "Security Expert" and knows everyone else has nothing of value to offer.

Careful people. You might hurt certain TSO feelings and then get cried up the chain to people with to much free time on their hands...

Some TSOs are very sensitive...until they are sending threatening e-mails and PMs...

You don't want to awaken a sleeping "giant". But then again I am a succesful snob and didn't get beat up in high school.

I like the pigeon post description.

As for TSA acceptance, well standardisation would be the first and foremost thing. With some TSO's vast experiance counting rivets on the AF flight line standardisation should not be a hard concept to understand. Uniform training and rule enforcment would go a long way to begin acceptance.

Junior G-man badges and poorly edited TSA Blogs are not a good way.

Ciao,
FH