New TSA requirements for address and DOB

Old Oct 23, 08, 1:02 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 505
I'm as much against the bodyscan stuff as anyone, but I don't mind the stated intention of this. (I will destroy the RFID in a new passport though)
The info (DOB,gender) is undoubtly already in my FF accounts.

The stated intention was to decrease confusing one flyer against someone on the NFL.

On the other hand, if they want my SSN, or print DOB on the boarding pass, I have a problem.

So much for me flying to Vegas on halloween in a drag outfit.
msimons is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 1:12 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: HNL
Programs: AS MVPG, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 233
I have a two-word middle name, and so I have two middle initials. My driver's license shows this, but my airline info will not because their systems can't handle the second letter/word. Now there's a mismatch. Anyone think TSA's system will be able to handle that. Some cultures go up to five or more words. Long ones.

A lot of Chinese people don't have middle names. Even worse, I can see the TSA being ignorant and figuring that the second word must be the middle name. So "Tai Sing Kuo" ends up with "Sing" as his new middle name. Which will be recorded incorrectly forever because you know that the TSA will never correct any mistakes.

Yeah, this is going to go well.
finlandia is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 1:40 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by finlandia
A lot of Chinese people don't have middle names. Even worse, I can see the TSA being ignorant and figuring that the second word must be the middle name. So "Tai Sing Kuo" ends up with "Sing" as his new middle name. Which will be recorded incorrectly forever because you know that the TSA will never correct any mistakes.
Korean names have the same issue. They are all written Last FirstA FirstB, where FirstA and FirstB are the two syllables of the first name. This often gets written as FirstA FirstB (middle) Last, FirstA-FirstB Last, or FirstAFirstB Last. Lee Myung-bak (President) could be Myung Bak Lee, Myung-bak Lee, or Myung B. Lee. It's a real PITA.

Then there are the problems Romanizing the characters.

Then there are people with one name (common in Indonesia, I think).
ralfp is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 1:51 pm
  #49  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
There is no point in coming on this board and wingeing - a good number of the posters here are American -- if each of you would pull out your cheque books and write out a cheque for 100 USD to the campaign of the congressperson of your choice, and mail it off with a note asking them to stop secure flight, I would guarantee it would never happen. A few dozen such letters is all it would take.
polonius is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 1:53 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,721
Originally Posted by ralfp
Interesting.

Oh no! MADD would go berserk if they knew about this, the possibility of someone drinking at age 20.
Starting in grad school I worked with a lot of people from various parts of India, some quite rural. One night we were talking about IDs, and apparently it was (still is?) common for parents to outright forge their kids' DOB by more than a year.

Apparently there were at one point traditions of not naming kids until the high probability of infant mortality had passed, so even to the modern day it's possible that no birth records are made. The first government records of these kids are when they start school, and the parents are apparently motivated to make their kids seem older (unclear if that was for daycare purposes, perceived social status, or accelerating future earnings). The school-registration DOB sticks with the kids and eventually ends up on their passport. So they could easily be "drinking age" in the US at a chronological age of 20, 19, or in extreme cases maybe 18.

From a TSA and George Orwell standpoint, it doesn't really matter of course. As long as you have a consistent DOB, it doesn't really matter if it's accurate.
studentff is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 1:57 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by WIRunner
Next year is going to suck.
Exactly Mrs. GHF's words.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 2:04 pm
  #52  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 40,218
Originally Posted by polonius
There is no point in coming on this board and wingeing - a good number of the posters here are American -- if each of you would pull out your cheque books and write out a cheque for 100 USD to the campaign of the congressperson of your choice, and mail it off with a note asking them to stop secure flight, I would guarantee it would never happen. A few dozen such letters is all it would take.
Can't be done at this point, I'm afraid - plus it would take far more than a few dozen letters.

Firstly, Congress is going into lame duck status - nothing is going to get done. Secondly, Congress passed its own legislation which gives DHS a blank check for money and policy to do essentially anything it wants, and there is little Congress can do to stop them.

The plan of attack for TSAS is restoring both DHS and TSA to Congressional oversight for both funding (total management of their budget) and policy, and only then do we have a reasonable shot at getting rid of SF.

The only chance for right now is a court challenge - so if anyone wants to call or write a check, they better start burning up the phone lines to the ACLU and ATA.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 2:26 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by polonius
There is no point in coming on this board and wingeing
Yes there is. It's fun. It also points out to Flyertalk readers (and people using Google) how stupid the rules are.
ralfp is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 2:29 pm
  #54  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 101,141
Originally Posted by msimons
I'm as much against the bodyscan stuff as anyone, but I don't mind the stated intention of this. (I will destroy the RFID in a new passport though)
The info (DOB,gender) is undoubtly already in my FF accounts.

The stated intention was to decrease confusing one flyer against someone on the NFL.

On the other hand, if they want my SSN, or print DOB on the boarding pass, I have a problem.

So much for me flying to Vegas on halloween in a drag outfit.
Give them the FF number and the credit card number for your purchase, and they're more likely to get the SSN and DOB without your express authorization pretty easily too. If you don't want them to readily be using your SSN or using your DOB somewhere else to track you down -- and make it visible to far more people than just for stated purposes -- then the whole ID as security dog and pony show has to be not only called what it is -- a dog and pony show that is a waste of resources -- it also has to be opposed as a matter of principle related to the right to privacy and freedom to move about without being subjected to a fishing expedition by the government.

Give them an inch, they take a mile.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 2:46 pm
  #55  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 101,141
Originally Posted by studentff
Starting in grad school I worked with a lot of people from various parts of India, some quite rural. One night we were talking about IDs, and apparently it was (still is?) common for parents to outright forge their kids' DOB by more than a year.

Apparently there were at one point traditions of not naming kids until the high probability of infant mortality had passed, so even to the modern day it's possible that no birth records are made. The first government records of these kids are when they start school, and the parents are apparently motivated to make their kids seem older (unclear if that was for daycare purposes, perceived social status, or accelerating future earnings). The school-registration DOB sticks with the kids and eventually ends up on their passport. So they could easily be "drinking age" in the US at a chronological age of 20, 19, or in extreme cases maybe 18.

From a TSA and George Orwell standpoint, it doesn't really matter of course. As long as you have a consistent DOB, it doesn't really matter if it's accurate.
That's still India and most of the developing world on the east side of the Atlantic -- it's done to get the children into primary school earlier and work around the government cut off dates.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 3:16 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington DC, DCA
Programs: AAdvantage, DL Skymiles, United MP
Posts: 4,035
I guess the final rule does state now that full name, DOB, and gender are required. Why did they make it mandatory? It used to be optional under the proposed rule.

I wonder how well this will go with the Average Joes?
MrAndy1369 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 4:36 pm
  #57  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,726
Originally Posted by mikeef
"I'm sorry, I can only give you my DOB in Base Eight. But don't worry, that's just like Base Ten, if you're missing two fingers." (and you get a cookie if you can identify that second sentence).

Mike
It's too bad Tom isn't making any more songs. I'd like to think he'd have a field day with DHS and TSA. Of course, he'd then be in danger of ending up like the TV satirist in "V for Vengeance": kneeling in the street in front of his house waiting for the bullet in the back of his head.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 4:40 pm
  #58  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 101,141
Originally Posted by Andy1369
I guess the final rule does state now that full name, DOB, and gender are required. Why did they make it mandatory? It used to be optional under the proposed rule.

I wonder how well this will go with the Average Joes?
The current clowns are in a rush to get in place as much as they can in order to tie down the next Administration with this current Administration's garbage policies in a whole variety of areas -- this is just another area.

The Department of Justice is also in overdrive to do this kind of garbage. Between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security and the White House -- and that's just on the end that directly relates to travel -- this stuff is being done now to make sure it is done at all and without being watered down.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 5:26 pm
  #59  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,784
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The current clowns are in a rush to get in place as much as they can in order to tie down the next Administration with this current Administration's garbage policies in a whole variety of areas -- this is just another area.

The Department of Justice is also in overdrive to do this kind of garbage. Between the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security and the White House -- and that's just on the end that directly relates to travel -- this stuff is being done now to make sure it is done at all and without being watered down.
emphasis mine: and because of just that, they will screw the pooch on this as they have on many other "innovations"
goalie is offline  
Old Oct 23, 08, 5:31 pm
  #60  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 101,141
Originally Posted by goalie
emphasis mine: and because of just that, they will screw the pooch on this as they have on many other "innovations"
I can only hope.
GUWonder is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread