![]() |
How many TSO's does it take.....
..... to look at the X-ray display?
I was in San Diego earlier this week, and was treated to yet another demonstration of TSA incompetence. In Terminal 1 at around noon, and only two of the five (or six?) lanes were open, which wouldn't have been a problem had the TSO's not been so clueless. The operator of one of the baggage screening machines saw something she couldn't identify, so she called for a colleague. After a few intense minutes, the two called for a third colleague to come over. After a few more intense minutes, they called for a fourth. Amazingly, no one just said "hey, let's take it out of the machine and look through the bag!" And of course, the line, which had been virtually nonexistent, grew and grew. Way to go, San Diego TSA. Inconvenience passengers because none of your screeners have enough common sense to take a bag out the X-ray machine and look through it off to the side. Simply brilliant. :rolleyes: |
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.
That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART! :cool: |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 10368562)
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.
That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART! :cool: |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 10368562)
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.
That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART! :cool: What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it. |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 10368687)
If it had been suspected of being a bomb, the terminal would have been cleared.
What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it. |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 10368562)
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.
That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART! :cool: |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 10368455)
..... to look at the X-ray display?
|
Originally Posted by purpleskiesfly
(Post 10369686)
7...At least that's how many it took last Monday AM in DEN.
|
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 10368562)
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.
That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART! :cool: |
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is?
While they're all gazing at the shiny gold thingy, the next guy in line pulls HIS detonator-pin. The more you know. ;) |
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
(Post 10370380)
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is?
|
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
(Post 10370380)
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is? Sure hope not!
|
Originally Posted by polonius
(Post 10371380)
You don't? Why not? If one goes off, they can give them all posthumous Darwin awards for doing their part to keep stupid genes out of the gene pool.
|
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
(Post 10371428)
... I'd lose all my faith in the war.....
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 10368687)
If it had been suspected of being a bomb, the terminal would have been cleared.
What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it. Yeah, isn't where they shout "BRAVO!!!" at the top of their lungs and all activity, right down to the molecular level, stops instantly? Saw it happen in PHX one day... --PP |
Originally Posted by polonius
(Post 10371380)
You don't? Why not? If one goes off, they can give them all posthumous Darwin awards for doing their part to keep stupid genes out of the gene pool.
|
TSOs are zombies and have had their brains removed
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 10368455)
Way to go, San Diego TSA. Inconvenience passengers because none of your screeners have enough common sense to take a bag out the X-ray machine and look through it off to the side. Simply brilliant. :rolleyes: How many DHS/TSA staff are needed to replace a light bulb? Answer: Forty (40) Four (4) to babble apologies that there will be a delay due to technical maintenance issues; Twelve (12) to stand around and supervise; One (1) to get the ladder; One (1) to get the light bulb; One (1) to hold the ladder; One (1) to climb the ladder, remove the old light bulb and insert the new bulb; One (1) to take the old light bulb to the trash bin; One (1) to take the light bulb just replaced to the trash because the new one didn't work; One (1) to go run for a new replacement light bulb; Ten (10) supervisor TSO's to stand around scratching their head because the second new light bulb won't work and light up; Five (5) TSO management to form a committee to investigate the light bulb outage; One (1) TSA Commander to run to Kippie and report the delay problem; One big JERK (1) DHS Exec named Kippie to deny everything. :D That's 40 !!! But it takes ONLY One (1)-mad-as-hell First Class pissed-off passenger, delayed now for an hour and a half in line while this monkey-business is going on, to get out of line, walk over to the light switch and TURN IT ON .... :D to fix things CORRECTLY the FIRST time around... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.