![]() |
Anti-terrorism representatives: Does the job require first had experience?
I just read an interesting story.
Does having a first-hand terror 'experience' bring something to the table for diplomats or other national representatives, working with other nations where radicalism/extremeism and trerrorism is both a domestic and international problem? A credibility enhancer. Terrorism envoy's close calls[SMH] Bill Paterson has twice been present when terrorists have struck. AS AUSTRALIA'S new envoy for international counter-terrorism, Bill Paterson has an impeccable - albeit undesirable - credential: he has twice been present when terrorists have struck. |
If you believe that the real decisions are taken within a personal level, it does. If you believe that the structures of the states are so strong that a single person can't influence them, it doesn't.
Even if it brings a lot of credibility, I don't believe that in this position, a person has a lot of power. This topic is talked and treated within higher levels than him; he just works as a publicity stunt. |
Anti-terrorism jobs in the US seem to have only one requirement: a pulse.
Kippie: "I am a no-talent assclown with no experience." Dear Leader: "When can you start?" |
Note to self: don't go anywhere near Bill Paterson without carrying lucky charm.
|
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 10342678)
Anti-terrorism jobs in the US seem to have only one requirement: a pulse.
Kippie: "I am a no-talent assclown with no experience." Dear Leader: "When can you start?" |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:39 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.