FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) implementation (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/833660-electronic-system-travel-authorization-esta-implementation.html)

USA_flyer Jun 12, 2008 6:28 am

Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) implementation
 
Main features of these arrangements are as follows –

Application can be made online from 1 August at http://esta.cbp.dhs.gov

Information required will include the following –
· Name
· Date of Birth
· Passport information
· Flight Number (which we understand can be added at a later date)
· Destination address (which we understand can be added at a later date)
· Communicable diseases
· Arrests and convictions
· Past visa history

Result of application will be 1) Authorised or 2) Pending (response available within 72hrs) or 3) Not Authorised (in which case the applicant will need to apply for a US Visa, which can be a lengthy procedure).

Once an application is approved, it is valid for 2 years or until the expiry date of the applicant’s passport, whichever is sooner.

Full details about ESTA can be found at
http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1212498186436.shtm

_________________________

My past visa history is none of your goddamn business.

Fredrik74 Jun 12, 2008 12:16 pm

I will wait until I know for sure that this is just replacing the silly paper that we get today before I make up my mind about this.


“Rather than relying on paper-based procedures, this system will leverage 21st century electronic means to obtain basic information about who is traveling to the U.S. without a visa,” said People's Commissar Michael Chertoff.
This would indicate it's just a replacement for the paper.

This too:

Until ESTA is mandatory for all VWP travelers, however, ESTA applicants will also still need to complete an I-94W form en-route, for presentation at a U.S. port of entry.

Kiwi Flyer Jun 12, 2008 5:38 pm

link


Once ESTA is mandatory and all
carriers are capable of receiving and
validating messages pertaining to the
traveler’s ESTA status as part of the
traveler’s boarding status, DHS will
eliminate the I–94W requirement.
That is different language to the earlier announcement and implies there may be a considerable period when both I94W and the ESTA have to be completed :td: Any bets on how long it takes some tinpot airline to comply?


Under ESTA, CBP also will be able to
screen travelers seeking to enter the
United States under VWP prior to their
arrival in the United States.
They already do screen VWP pax through the APIS data prior to arrival in USA (actually prior to departure from previous country visited).


Aliens
intending to travel under the VWP will
be able to obtain travel authorization in
advance of travel to the United States.
DHS notes that an authorization to
travel to the United States under ESTA
is not a determination that the alien
ultimately is admissible to the United
States.
So the reason for ESTA is to provide certainty to VWP pax who might otherwise arrive at USA and be denied, is just hot air.


ESTA will collect the same
information currently required on the
Form I–94W that is presented to a CBP
officer at a port of entry.
So we have to update for every flight number and address for every visit? Sometimes that info is not known 72 hours in advance.


Potential terrorists also may use VWP
exemption from the visa screening
process as a means to gain access to the
United States or an aircraft en route to
the United States to cause serious
damage, injury, or death in the United
States. Thus, implementation of this
rule prior to notice and comment is
necessary to protect the national
security of the United States and to
prevent potential terrorists from
exploiting VWP.
LOL - so just how many terrorists have exploited VWP to cause serious damage, injury, or death in the United States that would have been admitted under current rules and not admitted under this proposal?


changes to the Arrival and Departure
Record, Forms I–94 and I–94W. These
forms are in the process of being
updated under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
So extra info can easily be added to I-94W before these are phased out and can still say the ESTA has not added to the data required of visitors :td:


DHS has considered the
impact of this rule on small entities and
had determined that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
So reduced visitor numbers due to the new rules, and the reduced spend / R&D / etc is not an impact?

There's several pages outlining their estimate of the costs and "benefits" of ESTA. The methodology used is very flawed.

Markie Jun 12, 2008 10:32 pm

The Secretary of Homeland Security is anticipated to publish a notice in the Federal Register by mid-November 2008, announcing implementation of mandatory ESTA requirements on Jan. 12, 2009.

And just when does Mr Bush leave office?

whirledtraveler Jun 12, 2008 10:40 pm

I swear, we really pissed our pants after 9/11. I never imagined we'd be so scared for so long.

sefrischling Jun 12, 2008 10:43 pm

"Welcome to the United States.....the deportation line is to the left, secondary interrogation is to the right. Enjoy your stay then please go the hell home. NEXT!"

Ari Jun 13, 2008 10:10 am

How does this compare to the Australian electronic visa stuff?

YVR Cockroach Jun 13, 2008 10:14 am


Originally Posted by Ari (Post 9874126)
How does this compare to the Australian electronic visa stuff?

Basic passport info stuff no more than can be scanned on the machine-reabable code. Name, DoD, citizenship, passport no. and expiration.

Ari Jun 13, 2008 10:25 am


Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach (Post 9874145)
Basic passport info stuff no more than can be scanned on the machine-reabable code. Name, DoD, citizenship, passport no. and expiration.

So they don't ask where you are staying and what your visa history is-- but they do make you pay $$, right?

This whole ESTA thing seems so stupid to me because we have demonstrated such an inability to use in a useful manner any watchlist that we might have.

And as far as past visa history, they should know that already, they shouldn't have to ask! (Unless they mean non-US visa history, too).

fly-yul Jun 13, 2008 2:50 pm

Isn't the point of the Visa Wavier Program that you don't need a Visa?

Isn't this ESTA just a different way of forcing someone to get a Visa?

GUWonder Jun 13, 2008 3:39 pm


Originally Posted by Ari (Post 9874221)
So they don't ask where you are staying and what your visa history is-- but they do make you pay $$, right?

Except for the pay money part, I believe you are correct.

It was my belief that the vendors that facilitate applying for the ETA collect are the ones who retain the amount charged (if any money is charged to a visitor) while the Australian government itself doesn't directly see most (or all???) of the money being paid for ETA filings.

Let's see if/how soon the government tries to make the ESTA a fee-required system. I am sure the USG would love to collect the credit card numbers affiliated to even more foreigners than is already in the possession of the government. ;)

Kiwi Flyer Jun 13, 2008 3:53 pm


Originally Posted by Ari (Post 9874221)
So they don't ask where you are staying and what your visa history is-- but they do make you pay $$, right?

There are plenty of ways to get Australian evisa for free.


Originally Posted by Ari (Post 9874221)
This whole ESTA thing seems so stupid to me because we have demonstrated such an inability to use in a useful manner any watchlist that we might have.

Correct. The change means all the non-american false positives have to get visas to go to USA (even if only in transit) in addition to the harrassssment they get while in USA.

Kiwi Flyer Jun 13, 2008 3:54 pm


Originally Posted by fly-yul (Post 9875959)
Isn't the point of the Visa Wavier Program that you don't need a Visa?

Isn't this ESTA just a different way of forcing someone to get a Visa?

Yes and yes, ESTA is visa by another name.

Kiwi Flyer Jun 13, 2008 3:55 pm


Originally Posted by GUWonder (Post 9876291)
Let's see if/how soon the government tries to make the ESTA a fee-required system. I am sure the USG would love to collect the credit card numbers affiliated to even more foreigners than is already in the possession of the government. ;)

For most non-americans visiting USA they already have our credit card info thanks to APIS :mad:

Rose2455 Jun 13, 2008 7:51 pm

Should my husband do this or get a visa or not get a visa?
 
We are Australians going to the US for a holiday in September. I have dual citizenship - will use the US passport to go to and from USA and ditto with Australian Passport. Husband is Australian. We know there is a Visa Waiver Scheme so had not planned to get a visa. Now not so sure. Should he fill in the E form after August 1 or should he get a visa or should he do both or should we just go ahead and go without, assuming he will be accepted because of the visa waiver scheme. He would certainly be passed if applying for a visa. I'll need to know what to do soon as the weeks are ticking by.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:49 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.