Praying passenger is removed from plane

Old Apr 17, 2008, 3:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gotham City
Programs: Rapid Rewards, Skymiles, HHonors, Amex MR; Browns, Cavs, Indians, and Buckeyes Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,027
Praying passenger is removed from plane

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...cal&id=6087053

A passenger who left his seat to pray in the back of a plane before it took off, ignoring flight attendants' orders to return, was removed by an airport security guard, a witness and the airline said.
...
When flight attendants urged the man, who was carrying a religious book, to take his seat, he ignored them, Brafman said. Two friends, who were seated, tried to tell the attendants that the man couldn't stop until his prayers were over in about 2 minutes, he said.
Weird situation. Things would've been different if the guy was in the bathroom, I'm sure...
sammy0623 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 3:39 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5
Antisamatic?

I'm sure the first thing comes in this man's mind is to sue the crew and airlines for being antisamatic
KTPA is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 3:43 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FLL
Programs: AA PLT 2.7 MM, DL GLD, UA Prem, BW Diamond, PC PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,285
I am sure we will get a flood of "the poor guy was just practicing his religion". Obviously the action was taken with the intent provoke a reaction.

I'm sure you would not see the same on EL-AL. After all, a plane full of devotees would not have the space to allow this sort of behavior even if they wanted to.


Where is judge Judy when we need her?

Regardless of your religion, failure to follow flight crew instructions is a problem.
Had the plane taken off with him in this position, and he flew into the wall, I'm sure you would have seen a hefty lawsuit.

For a change, it would be nice to see a Judge throw the book at him and fine him for causing a disturbance.

I wonder why the "friends" did not advise him that this was going to be a problem.
shadesofgrey1x is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 3:44 pm
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Living the dream in Antigua and the nightmare in Florida
Programs: AA PLAT 2MM, *A Gold, WN detractor
Posts: 49,570
Originally Posted by KTPA
I'm sure the first thing comes in this man's mind is to sue the crew and airlines for being antisamatic
That would be anti-semitic. He has no grounds - it is the law that one must obey uniformed cabin crew whilst on board the plane.
SJCFlyerLG is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 3:54 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QDF
Programs: AA EXP (2MM), Marriott Tit
Posts: 1,032
Angry

The passenger was removed for failing to follow crew member instructions. Period. Full stop. He could have praying, meditating, running in place, or blowing bubbles; it doesn't matter.

There's enough bigotry and overreaction around. There's no need to invent it where it doesn't exist.

Last edited by essxjay; Apr 17, 2008 at 6:20 pm Reason: Thread title edit for accuracy
PlatinumScum is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:03 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by SJCFlyerLG
That would be anti-semitic. He has no grounds - it is the law that one must obey uniformed cabin crew whilst on board the plane.
Thanks for the correction. Last time someone, again with United, made a big scene about bringing his "Fish sandwich" into the plane because it's Kosher and he was asked to throw it away because it was so stinky in the cabin and people were complaining. And he accused United of being anti-semitic and for having no respect for his religious believes even though everyone in the cabin was complaining.
KTPA is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:12 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,866
Originally Posted by PlatinumScum
I'm no fan of overbearing authority figures, be they TSOs, FAs, etc., but I have to say that I find the title of the original article (which I assume inspired the title of this thread) to be highly inaccurate.

The passenger was removed for failing to follow crew member instructions. Period. Full stop. He could have praying, meditating, running in place, or blowing bubbles; it doesn't matter.

There's enough bigotry and overreaction around. There's no need to invent it where it doesn't exist.
yes you are 100% correct as if instructed to sit, you have to sit but if i may point out 1 thing from the article and a personal observation.

i have taken many an early jkf-sfo flight on ua and have seen many chasidim complete with tallit & kippah praying in the gate area so my question is why could he not pray prior to boarding the aircraft?

now, from the article with the bolding mine...

.......stood near the lavatories and began saying his prayers while the United Airlines jet was being boarded

my read on this is that the a/c was still in the boarding process and not ready to be "buttoned up". if in fact the case, there are other pax still boarding the a/c, still in the aisles, stowing luggage, etc so why not give him the 2 minutes as the pax 2 friends asked?

just looking at it from both sides.
goalie is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:19 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,716
"I'm sure the first thing comes in this man's mind is to sue the crew and airlines for being antisamatic"

Probably for being antisemitic too. Were this story about anyone doing anything other than praying, it would not have made headlines. The mere intonation that there's a story here is enough to make news agencies pick it up.

You can't disregard FA instructions, period. That's the law. This includes things like praying. Being highly religious doesn't make what he did any better than the jerk sitting up front using his/her phone after the FA has instructed that all electronics be turned off.
thegeneral is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:38 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gotham City
Programs: Rapid Rewards, Skymiles, HHonors, Amex MR; Browns, Cavs, Indians, and Buckeyes Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,027
yea i did lift the title from the article...i added the part about the "failing to follow crew orders"

i do think its weird that it happened while boarding...
sammy0623 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:41 pm
  #10  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,866
Originally Posted by sammy0623
yea i did lift the title from the article...i added the part about the "failing to follow crew orders"

i do think its weird that it happened while boarding...
i agree where you mention "while boarding" as from my post above, i've seen praying in the gate area prior to boarding.
goalie is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:56 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by thegeneral
You can't disregard FA instructions, period. That's the law. This includes things like praying. Being highly religious doesn't make what he did any better than the jerk sitting up front using his/her phone after the FA has instructed that all electronics be turned off.
There is an expectation of reasonableness - if the flight was actually boarding, the guy should have asked the FA is this was a good place to stand, he needs about 5 minutes and won't be able to move during that time. Likely he picked his spot unknowingly in the way of the crew and they played a power game. This is if the flight was truly still boarding - none of us know what the timing actually was.

All of that said - calling the police to remove the guy seems beyond excessive. I was once asked for identification by an FA -- this is outside the bounds of their job and they are not supposed to do this other than checking for age when buying alcohol. I refused, but did comply with what was his third request for just my bp ... the entire story is a long one but the guy was totally wrong and his actions inappropriate. Not only did I not get in trouble, but my complaint didn't quite get him fired (although I might be wrong on that one, I believe he was a problem child from something else I heard), but he was seriously sanctioned as a result.

To me - your "jump when they say jump" attitude is as bad as the meek cattle going through security with no question as to what/why/how.
GoingAway is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 4:56 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by shadesofgrey1x
I am sure we will get a flood of "the poor guy was just practicing his religion". Obviously the action was taken with the intent provoke a reaction.
Please show me where in the article the person displays intent to provoke a reaction.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 5:01 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which runs area airports, and the Transportation Safety Administration, which handles airport security, said Thursday they weren't involved in the incident.

With the religious implications on this one, it's understandable why the TSA doesn't want to touch this one.

But it begs the question....who removed him -- someone from Wackenhut?

UA.com says the flight left four minutes late due to 'Air Traffic Control.'

After "delaying" the plane, and the time it took to get the man off the plane, the plane still left on-time.

What gives?
LessO2 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 5:38 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by shadesofgrey1x
I am sure we will get a flood of "the poor guy was just practicing his religion". Obviously the action was taken with the intent provoke a reaction.
Why "obviously"? This guy didn't follow crew instructions and held up departure. He should have been removed, and he was. All it proves is that stupidity isn't confined to any one religion.
PTravel is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2008, 5:40 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: Landry's President's Club, Marriott Silver, Awesomeness EXPLT
Posts: 20,358
This is one of those situations that I think better communication probably would save alot of problems. That being said I wouldn't want to pass judgement on this without more info..
Cheers
Howie
stockmanjr is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.