![]() |
Seizing kid's toothpaste
Traveling out of GGG the other day (the only commercial traffic there is three American Eagle flights daily), I noticed a TSO doing a bag check on a toddler's backpack. The kid looked to be about two or three.
The TSO finds a round can-looking container of children's toothpaste in the backpack and says, "This is too big!" Those guys are thorough. So mom and dad are given the choice of taking it to the car or tossing it. They agree to tossing it. I feel much safer now. :rolleyes::o Now, a question to TSA employees who post here. Do you ever just look the other way when you find something like that, or would you get in big trouble from Kipland? |
How stupid. PLEASE get rid of this agency now. Makes me .....sick.
|
does...
tsa employ any under weight, under 50, without attitude employees??
|
Originally Posted by videomaker
(Post 9341421)
Traveling out of GGG the other day (the only commercial traffic there is three American Eagle flights daily), I noticed a TSO doing a bag check on a toddler's backpack. The kid looked to be about two or three.
The TSO finds a round can-looking container of children's toothpaste in the backpack and says, "This is too big!" Those guys are thorough. So mom and dad are given the choice of taking it to the car or tossing it. They agree to tossing it. I feel much safer now. :rolleyes::o Now, a question to TSA employees who post here. Do you ever just look the other way when you find something like that, or would you get in big trouble from Kipland? |
Originally Posted by Haveaniceday
(Post 9341673)
Are you asking this question only because it was found in a childs backpack? Would you still ask that same question if the over limit toothpaste was in the parents bag?:)
|
Originally Posted by videomaker
(Post 9341707)
The question was for TSA employees. Are you one?
Yeah, and if a TSO answered in the affirmative, then the next response from somebody would be, "Oh, so let's just dress Osama up like a 5 year old and give him a Sponge Bob backpack, he'll get right through the "security circus". Ha, ha, ha....:p |
Originally Posted by tmspa
(Post 9341738)
Yeah, and if a TSO answered in the affirmative, then the next response from somebody would be, "Oh, so let's just dress Osama up like a 5 year old and give him a Sponge Bob backpack, he'll get right through the "security circus".
|
Originally Posted by tmspa
(Post 9341738)
So, you want to know if any TSA employee has every let a potential explosive through security just because it was packed in a child's luggage?
Yeah, and if a TSO answered in the affirmative, then the next response from somebody would be, "Oh, so let's just dress Osama up like a 5 year old and give him a Sponge Bob backpack, he'll get right through the "security circus". Ha, ha, ha....:p Given the fact that insurgents have started using mentally retarded individuals as human bombs in Afghanistan and Iraq I'm not surprised that the TSA hasnt been lenient on this... And no I'm not touching the whole politics behind that but I just wanted to mention its not as simple as the complainers and naysayers would like us to believe. |
Originally Posted by tmspa
(Post 9341738)
So, you want to know if any TSA employee has every let a potential explosive through security just because it was packed in a child's luggage?
|
Originally Posted by vassilipan
(Post 9342324)
Oh, my! And exactly how many of these have you detected? And the next step is to throw the suspect material in the trash can? What a joke of an agency.
|
Originally Posted by videomaker
(Post 9341707)
The question was for TSA employees. Are you one?
I didn't answer your question, I asked you a question. Would you still ask the same question if the 'toothpaste' was in the parents bag?:) |
Originally Posted by Haveaniceday
(Post 9342394)
I didn't answer your question, I asked you a question. Would you still ask the same question if the 'toothpaste' was in the parents bag?:)
|
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9342409)
Yes, because the whole toothpaste scare is beyond retarded.
|
Originally Posted by tmspa
(Post 9341738)
So, you want to know if any TSA employee has every let a potential explosive through security just because it was packed in a child's luggage? ...
Toothpaste is toothpaste. Shampoo is shampoo. Water is water. Version 1.0 of the War on Liquids was due to the fear of binary explosives being mixed in flight...that threat was undermined by the facts, so now Version 2.0 of the War on Liquids is due to the fear of pre-mixed binary explosives being brought on board...that threat has also been undermined by the facts, so now how about we invest in existing technology to scan all containers for the presence of restricted chemicals, stop the War on Liquids, and return some sanity to the checkpoint? By the way, if you want to find some real potential explosives, you might want to start looking inside cargo...but of course, Kippie doesn't think any cargo is dangerous, right...Trusted Shippers :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 9342436)
how about we invest in existing technology to scan all containers for the presence of restricted chemicals, stop the War on Liquids, and return some sanity to the checkpoint?
By the way, if you want to find some real potential explosives, you might want to start looking inside cargo...but of course, Kippie doesn't think any cargo is dangerous, right...Trusted Shippers :rolleyes: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.