Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CBP keeping the country safe!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2007, 1:02 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berlin, Germany; Not in Indiana any more!
Programs: UA Gold, HH Gold, Dirt elsewhere
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by thegeneral
If they didn't do this, it would make for a large very easy way to smuggle a few tons of goods across the border would it not? It's not as if this is a normal occurance. I've crossed at the border points in Quebec about 50 times. I have never heard or seen any fire trucks racing for the border. The border police were doing their due diligence. Searching a truck, checking the ID's of all aboard and running the plate in 8 minutes isn't bad. The article doesn't note if this has happened before, how long it usually takes, etc. It still is a vehicle coming from another country.
Unless the fire is preplanned, how would the Canadians know that the next call would be their opportunity to sneak illegal goods into the US? I imagine that space on a fire truck is very limited and everything has a purpose--in other words, there isn't the space to smuggle a few tons of goods across the border. There probably isn't the space to smuggle anything across the border.

This kind of border "protection" is only going to come back and hurt America--next time Canadians will think twice about even trying and let the building burn.
InIndiana is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 3:42 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ICN / 평택
Programs: AA, DL Gold, UA Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 8,714
I seem to recall years back when Palestinian terror organizations would use ambulances as a ruse to blow up Israelis. You know, rush in, no one checks the ambulance or driver and then --- BOOOM!

Cross border firefighting is a concept I never really thought about before, and I'm glad that those communities have the ties to work together. However, it is not always CBP to blame for things like this.

Will a Canadian (or American) fire company responding to a cross-border fire be used as a ruse for a terror attack? Extremely doubtful. But it is not outside the realm of possibility.
etch5895 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 8:20 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: DUB/YHZ/PVD
Programs: AF Plat, SPG Titanium
Posts: 534
Originally Posted by etch5895

Will a Canadian (or American) fire company responding to a cross-border fire be used as a ruse for a terror attack? Extremely doubtful. But it is not outside the realm of possibility.
The huge difference here is that they only cross the border at the request of the local American fire department. They don't just see a fire and go "hmm, looks like they need help. Let's speed across the border today."
wsommerv is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 9:47 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: CO Plat, Priority Club Plat, HH Diamond, Avis First, Hertz #1Gold
Posts: 720
Originally Posted by wsommerv
The huge difference here is that they only cross the border at the request of the local American fire department. They don't just see a fire and go "hmm, looks like they need help. Let's speed across the border today."
To extend the rampant paranoia, "But what if the fire department on the American side was compromised?"

Another episode of 24 in the making.

You CANNOT protect against every conceivable threat.
vassilipan is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 10:03 am
  #20  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by vassilipan
To extend the rampant paranoia, "But what if the fire department on the American side was compromised?"

Another episode of 24 in the making.

You CANNOT protect against every conceivable threat.
And what if there was a sleeper agent three generations deep waiting for such an opportunity? That's the kind of Idiocy Prevention we're up against.

Maybe we should check the fire fighters' IDs when they arrive on the scene and frisk them for "dangerous" items? Better safe than sorry. You can't be too careful.
Spiff is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 10:17 am
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by etch5895
Will a Canadian (or American) fire company responding to a cross-border fire be used as a ruse for a terror attack? Extremely doubtful. But it is not outside the realm of possibility.
So... the terrorists will get hold of a Canadian firetruck and uniforms, hide it and the crew somewhere near the border, have their U.S. cell start a major fire near the boarder, monitor the phone lines for the U.S. fire dept. to request help, then get to the border before the real Canadian firetruck, just so they can smuggle something or someone into the U.S.

Wouldn't it be easier for them to just acquire everything they need inside the U.S., and smuggle their operatives across the border in any of the weak areas of the tens of thousands of miles of U.S. boarder? The success of terrorist operation is based on fact that they make simple plans; the more complex, the more chance it will be detected or go wrong. This plan is way to complicated. Great for a hollywood movie, but in reality this is WAAAAY outside the realm of possibility.
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 12:30 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
in reality this is WAAAAY outside the realm of possibility.
When you're scared ....less nothing is outside your 'realm'.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 12:32 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by InIndiana
This kind of border "protection" is only going to come back and hurt America--next time Canadians will think twice about even trying.
No, firefighters being who they are they will respond again.

Unless it's the actual border post on fire ^
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 4:54 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by thegeneral
If they didn't do this, it would make for a large very easy way to smuggle a few tons of goods across the border would it not? It's not as if this is a normal occurance. I've crossed at the border points in Quebec about 50 times. I have never heard or seen any fire trucks racing for the border. The border police were doing their due diligence. Searching a truck, checking the ID's of all aboard and running the plate in 8 minutes isn't bad. The article doesn't note if this has happened before, how long it usually takes, etc. It still is a vehicle coming from another country.
It may have been another article I read, but in an average year the fire department across the border in Quebec responds about 30 times a year. The same applies to the upstate New York fire department going into Quebec.

The mutual agreement has been around for many years as well.

With such an agreement in place, I believe the CBP should use common sense and allow for an expedited crossing.
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 5:06 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
IHG Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,185
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
the CBP should use common sense
Can you say mutually exclusive?
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 5:17 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
Can you say mutually exclusive?
Oops... did I just put common sense and CBP into the same sentence? Not sure what I was thinking; my bad. Mea Culpa!
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 5:23 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,801
It gets better

Mr. Rivers, a board member with the New York State Association of Fire Chiefs, said Sunday's was not an entirely isolated incident, either. A U.S. firefighter returning from battling a blaze in Quebec was detained recently over his identification upon returning home, he said. Crossing into Canada has not been a problem, Mr. Rivers said.
Much more complete story here:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../National/home

You have to remember in that part of the continent, national boundaries run right through private houses, libraries and the like.

Cross-border backup is considered crucial for smaller and rural communities without the manpower and equipment of big cities. George A. Rivers, the mayor of Rouses Point, says his village of 2,400 relies on Quebec border towns; Lacolle, only 12 kilometres away, is nearer than local American communities, he said.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 8:58 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 946
Wait. Don't firetrucks tend to have equipment like axes?

[lou dobbs voice on] You're telling me that CBP let undocumented foreigners carry sharp instruments that could have been used as weapons across the broken border!?! Incredible. French-speaking illegal aliens from Socialist Canada are allowed to steal jobs from ordinary American firefighters without even obtaining B-1 visas. All under the noses of the Border Patrol. [/lou dobbs voice off]

Is there any chance the whole of the DHS would go on a wildcat strike? We need an air traffic controller-style housecleaning. Good on the firefighters (or whomever) for bringing this story to the media.

Last edited by CXYYZ; Nov 15, 2007 at 9:04 pm
CXYYZ is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 10:04 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ICN / 평택
Programs: AA, DL Gold, UA Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 8,714
In my opinion, the US and Canada should have open borders anyway, similar to Schengen.

But we don't. Apparantly one or both nations wants to maintain border sovereignty. That includes the use of border control agents. Border Control agents who do (and should) have the authority to do their jobs.

So, regardless of what anyone thinks could or couldn't happen, it really doesn't matter. Until we do any with our US / Canadian borders (which I would be in favor of doing), our CBP officers are going to continue to enforce the laws of the US and their SOPs.
etch5895 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2007, 10:14 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by etch5895
Apparantly one or both nations wants to maintain border sovereignty.
The US proposed something of this ilk post 9/11. Canada rejected it on the grounds that our foreign and domestic policies are incompatible with what the US would have imposed as restrictions on the entry of foreign nationals into the 'perimeter' area. For example, had Canada agreed, we likely would have been forced to fingerprint and photograph foreigners. Also, it is my understanding that Canada does not require entry visas from as many countries as does the US. This would have created problems too.

Back to the topic at hand. I am certain that CBP must have some discretionary powers. If so, logic dictates that SOP do not apply in this situation and that common sense should prevail.
CXYYZ is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.