U.S. issues shoe-bomb terror alert
#16
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
#17
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
I tried to find the source, but with just "Europe" and "September" there's little chance even if it was newsworthy over there. Now I'm assuming that bus luggage is not routinely searched (Israel is not Europe, yes ?) so the putative terrorist must have drawn attention to him/herself in some other way. Big deal locally maybe, but a world-wide "terror alert" ?
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: AAdvantage, SkyMiles, USAir, Singapore, BA
Posts: 602
You mean the threat is imaginary?
You mean if Richard Reid hadn't been such a doofus, AA63 couldn't have disappeared over the Atlantic?
My take is that Reid's failure taught Khaled Shaikh Mohammed and his playmates how not to attack an airliner - which knowledge is almost as important as how to. Check the shoes. I can take it.
My take is that Reid's failure taught Khaled Shaikh Mohammed and his playmates how not to attack an airliner - which knowledge is almost as important as how to. Check the shoes. I can take it.
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
No dispute there but as mentioned, the motivation for releasing it to the public is umm.. questionable.
I tried to find the source, but with just "Europe" and "September" there's little chance even if it was newsworthy over there. Now I'm assuming that bus luggage is not routinely searched (Israel is not Europe, yes ?) so the putative terrorist must have drawn attention to him/herself in some other way. Big deal locally maybe, but a world-wide "terror alert" ?
I tried to find the source, but with just "Europe" and "September" there's little chance even if it was newsworthy over there. Now I'm assuming that bus luggage is not routinely searched (Israel is not Europe, yes ?) so the putative terrorist must have drawn attention to him/herself in some other way. Big deal locally maybe, but a world-wide "terror alert" ?
#20
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by CessnaJock
You mean if Richard Reid hadn't been such a doofus, AA63 couldn't have disappeared over the Atlantic?
Originally Posted by CessnaJock
My take is that Reid's failure taught Khaled Shaikh Mohammed and his playmates how not to attack an airliner - which knowledge is almost as important as how to. Check the shoes. I can take it.
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: AAdvantage, SkyMiles, USAir, Singapore, BA
Posts: 602
#24
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
You mean if Richard Reid hadn't been such a doofus, AA63 couldn't have disappeared over the Atlantic?
My take is that Reid's failure taught Khaled Shaikh Mohammed and his playmates how not to attack an airliner - which knowledge is almost as important as how to. Check the shoes. I can take it.
My take is that Reid's failure taught Khaled Shaikh Mohammed and his playmates how not to attack an airliner - which knowledge is almost as important as how to. Check the shoes. I can take it.
What if Reid had put his sloppy bomb in his pants? Or his butt? Could you 'take it' then?
The 'Richard Reid' excuse is the most pathetic, lamest excuse that the imbeciles in TSA have ever used to justify their disgusting shoe fetishes/perversion. I think Kip and his ilk just want to save the quarters they would be otherwise spending at the peep booths.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
ONE individual; a clumsy, foolish, lunatic acting on his own, hides some explosive material in his shoe and here we are roughly 5 years later still forcibly disrobing our footwear at the checkpoint to send it through a device technically incapable of detecting whether or not the footwear is actually packed with explosives.
Truly pathetic.
Truly pathetic.
#26
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
ONE individual; a clumsy, foolish, lunatic acting on his own, hides some explosive material in his shoe and here we are roughly 5 years later still forcibly disrobing our footwear at the checkpoint to send it through a device technically incapable of detecting whether or not the footwear is actually packed with explosives.
Truly pathetic.
Truly pathetic.
#27
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In between
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, SPG/Marriott Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 564
ONE individual; a clumsy, foolish, lunatic acting on his own, hides some explosive material in his shoe and here we are roughly 5 years later still forcibly disrobing our footwear at the checkpoint to send it through a device technically incapable of detecting whether or not the footwear is actually packed with explosives.
Truly pathetic.
Truly pathetic.
#28
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 253
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
It's my belief that terrorists are not going to quietly detonate a bomb on board an aircraft on which they're riding - there is no point to it. There is no dramatic show to be made by doing it that way. There won't be any telltale signs left in the wreckage that will absolutely point to someone's shoe, underpants, bra or hat being the bomb source.
It is far easier for them to detonate something remotely, then claim responsibility afterwards. As of this moment, loading something in cargo is easy enough, anyone could do it.
Of course we don't x-ray or inspect cargo. We x-ray shoes. Brilliant risk analysis by ol' Kip.
#30
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 253
It's my belief that terrorists are not going to quietly detonate a bomb on board an aircraft on which they're riding - there is no point to it. There is no dramatic show to be made by doing it that way. There won't be any telltale signs left in the wreckage that will absolutely point to someone's shoe, underpants, bra or hat being the bomb source.
Agree.