Personal electronic devices at takeoff and landing
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ORD, PDX
Programs: UA 1K, HH Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Avis 1st
Posts: 284
Personal electronic devices at takeoff and landing
I am not an uptight traveler, but I do get uncomfortable when I see other passengers using their phones and iPods after being asked to turn them off. Last night there was a guy in an exit row across the aisle from me with his cell phone conspicuously on through landing (I don't think it was transmitting, but who knows?) and the guy in front of him was skipping through songs on his iPod and making sure to hide it each time the FA walked past doing pre-landing checks. Typically I tap them on the arm and politely remind them that they need to have turned their devices off, and probably 25% of the time they just turn it over and pretend they did.
I know that transmitting wireless devices are genuinely a problem, and that other small electronics are "probably" really okay, so I'm curious what others do in these situations. Or are you the folks with the iPods playing as we land?!
I know that transmitting wireless devices are genuinely a problem, and that other small electronics are "probably" really okay, so I'm curious what others do in these situations. Or are you the folks with the iPods playing as we land?!
#3
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 757
yeah, probably worrying too much. lots of electronic items are probably on in the luggage hold. and really, if a $50 gameboy can bring down a $200M plane then I better short Boeing stock and sign up for greyhound.
but yeah, you do what the FAs tell you to. is listening to 10 more minutes of Carrie Underwood or whoever worth it.
but yeah, you do what the FAs tell you to. is listening to 10 more minutes of Carrie Underwood or whoever worth it.
#5
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Programs: UA 1MM, SPG Gold, EVA Diamond
Posts: 1,072
It's more of a risk management issue since they do not want that one random cell phone version 9.2344191823 with a weird antenna possibly interfering with the plane. Sure it's bad form, but there isn't much you can do. If you really feel uneasy, feel free to mention it to the FA and they can tell them to shut it off.... I don't know why people have to use their devices for those 15/20 minutes on take off and landing....
There have been exceptions though. When we are stuck on the tarmac (ground stops) I don't hesitate to whip out either my broadband card or cell phone.
There have been exceptions though. When we are stuck on the tarmac (ground stops) I don't hesitate to whip out either my broadband card or cell phone.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
I am not an uptight traveler, but I do get uncomfortable when I see other passengers using their phones and iPods after being asked to turn them off. Last night there was a guy in an exit row across the aisle from me with his cell phone conspicuously on through landing (I don't think it was transmitting, but who knows?) and the guy in front of him was skipping through songs on his iPod and making sure to hide it each time the FA walked past doing pre-landing checks. Typically I tap them on the arm and politely remind them that they need to have turned their devices off, and probably 25% of the time they just turn it over and pretend they did.
I know that transmitting wireless devices are genuinely a problem, and that other small electronics are "probably" really okay, so I'm curious what others do in these situations. Or are you the folks with the iPods playing as we land?!
I know that transmitting wireless devices are genuinely a problem, and that other small electronics are "probably" really okay, so I'm curious what others do in these situations. Or are you the folks with the iPods playing as we land?!
Anybody ever give you a stern MYOB? Or worse?
As has been posted before, if the use of these devices had ANY potential to cause harm during any portion of flight, they would not be permitted onboard.
#7
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
I never get nervous when my seatmate uses electronics at anytime. I've been 'on the range', 'in the chamber', done the math, and have no concerns whatsoever.
You can't spell geek without an EE, btw.
#8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
- The pax has requested that you wake him in the event he is asleep when the FA comes with drinks/snacks/meals.
- The pax is seated between you and the aisle, and is asleep/zoned out to music/etc. and you need to get his attention to permit safe/polite passage to the aisle.
Any other touching is assault and battery in most states and usually unwelcome contact. If you have a problem with the actions of another passenger, take it to the FA.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,159
I agree with FWAAA and DevilDog438. =/ FWAAA put it harshly, but, yeah, like I said, you should butt out. It's their business, and we're all adults here.
Hey, we all make mistakes. I've been guilty of being the "annoying seatmate" once or twice, I'm sure.
Hey, we all make mistakes. I've been guilty of being the "annoying seatmate" once or twice, I'm sure.
#10
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,638
"Those who give up essential liberties to purchase temporary safety deserve neither and lose both." -Benjamin Franklin-
I might be concerned about people using their cellphones, but not their iPods. What's that gotta do with it? Besides, at 35000 ft in the air, you'd be lucky to get a signal.
I might be concerned about people using their cellphones, but not their iPods. What's that gotta do with it? Besides, at 35000 ft in the air, you'd be lucky to get a signal.
#11
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHL
Programs: US/*A, Marriott, ICH, Budget, Avis
Posts: 762
This is always an interesting back and forth and a I finally get it! I'm pretty firmly entrenched in the myob camp, however this line of reasoning doesn't work because those that would tap you likely believe that it IS their business because they believe you are directly endangering them. Not sure how to amend the argument though.
I don't often need my device(s) in those 15 or 20 odd minutes during climb out and final approach; however when final approach turns into a holding pattern my seat often goes back and sometimes the bose qc3s reappear.
I don't often need my device(s) in those 15 or 20 odd minutes during climb out and final approach; however when final approach turns into a holding pattern my seat often goes back and sometimes the bose qc3s reappear.
#12
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: Landry's President's Club, Marriott Silver, Awesomeness EXPLT
Posts: 20,408
The only acceptable reasons to tap someone you do not have a personal connection with on an airplane:
Any other touching is assault and battery in most states and usually unwelcome contact. If you have a problem with the actions of another passenger, take it to the FA.
- The pax has requested that you wake him in the event he is asleep when the FA comes with drinks/snacks/meals.
- The pax is seated between you and the aisle, and is asleep/zoned out to music/etc. and you need to get his attention to permit safe/polite passage to the aisle.
Any other touching is assault and battery in most states and usually unwelcome contact. If you have a problem with the actions of another passenger, take it to the FA.
Cheers
Howie
Last edited by stockmanjr; Oct 26, 2007 at 3:03 pm
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: AAdvantage, SkyMiles, USAir, Singapore, BA
Posts: 602
There are numerous posters here with impressive credentials who are totally sure there is absolutely no danger from PEDs, including cell phones transmitting.
There are equally qualified observers who are just as certain that it's a statistical crapshoot - and the fact there hasn't been an accident doesn't prove there's no problem. (This is known in casinos as The Gambler's Fallacy.)
For myself, I simply point out to the miscreant that in today's highly-charged security environment, the FAs could easily bust them for non-compliance with an order issued by the crew.
If they don't take the hint, I mosey up to the galley and say "cell phone in 12C" and get a can of Cranapple.
There are equally qualified observers who are just as certain that it's a statistical crapshoot - and the fact there hasn't been an accident doesn't prove there's no problem. (This is known in casinos as The Gambler's Fallacy.)
For myself, I simply point out to the miscreant that in today's highly-charged security environment, the FAs could easily bust them for non-compliance with an order issued by the crew.
If they don't take the hint, I mosey up to the galley and say "cell phone in 12C" and get a can of Cranapple.
Last edited by CessnaJock; Oct 26, 2007 at 3:11 pm
#15
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: AA Exec Plat, United Plat
Posts: 451
IMO, you are being a bit uptight.
Why do you think transmitting wireless devices are genuinely a problem? What is the "problem?" I turn my devices off for takeoff and landing because I don't want to be hassled, not because I think they will cause a problem.
Also, people honestly forget to turn off electronic devices all the time - haven't you ever heard a cell phone start ringing in the overhead compartment halfway through a flight? If that doesn't cause the plane to plummet from the sky, I'm not too worried about the guy who his BB or iPod on during landing.
Also, people honestly forget to turn off electronic devices all the time - haven't you ever heard a cell phone start ringing in the overhead compartment halfway through a flight? If that doesn't cause the plane to plummet from the sky, I'm not too worried about the guy who his BB or iPod on during landing.