Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NASA buries aviation safety study.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2007, 9:03 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
NASA buries aviation safety study.

Story here: http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=116&sid=1274749

MOFFETT FIELD, Calif. (AP) - Anxious to avoid upsetting air travelers, NASA is withholding results from an unprecedented national survey of pilots that found safety problems like near collisions and runway interference occur far more frequently than the government previously recognized.

..............

A senior NASA official, associate administrator Thomas S. Luedtke, said revealing the findings could damage the public's confidence in airlines and affect airline profits. Luedtke acknowledged that the survey results "present a comprehensive picture of certain aspects of the U.S. commercial aviation industry."

..............

"Release of the requested data, which are sensitive and safety-related, could materially affect the public confidence in, and the commercial welfare of, the air carriers and general aviation companies whose pilots participated in the survey," Luedtke wrote in a final denial letter to the AP.
..............
At least they didn't trot out the Terrorism word.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 9:12 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MCO
Programs: UA Silver, DL Silver (MM), HH LT Diamond, MR LT Platinum
Posts: 564
You beat me to it.

Isn't it more frightening that the AP has tried to get the info under the FOIA for the last 14 months and was rebuffed?

Just last week, NASA ordered the contractor that conducted the survey to purge all related data from its computers.

............

"If the airlines aren't safe I want to know about it," said Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., chairman of the House Science and Technology investigations and oversight subcommittee. "I would rather not feel a false sense of security because they don't tell us."

Discussing NASA's decision not to release the survey data, the congressman said: "There is a faint odor about it all."

............

Officials at the NASA Ames Research Center in California have said they want to publish their own report on the project by year's end.
So we will get the expurgated version because it's for our own good. "You can't handle the truth"
NWstu is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 3:06 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Omaha, NE, USA
Posts: 1,424
Not to pile on, but this is another frustrating example of our government systems not being nearly accountable enough to us as citizens.
NoClu is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 3:12 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Programs: BA Silver, FB Silver, EB Silver, RR Silver.
Posts: 554
thats a b***s*** if you ask me.. everything is about money in the us, and ofcourse every corner of the world, and this issue is a great example, the airliners are scared to loose money and prefer to "lie" to the customers, every citizen has the right to know everything about air safety, and safety in general and money should be the least important in this issue..
thesimflyer is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 5:06 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Programs: AA PLT | HHonors Gold | Starwood Gold*
Posts: 214
Thumbs up

I remember posting about a flight I had where another plane seemed to be VERY close to mine and everyone here pretty much called me a liar and made off remarks pertaining to Top Gun and having a wingman. I hope they release the data so I can vindicate myself. I've been saving the "I told you so" for a while. Can't wait to use it

I would definitely like to know the truth. I don't want to have some false sense of security *cough TSA cough*
cali99boy is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 5:35 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
I've said many times that there have been incidents that have not been released to the public because it might cause people to not fly.

Many, many FlyerTalkers disagreed with me.

I think this situation, while not proving my point, lends some credence to it.
law dawg is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 6:40 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by cali99boy
I remember posting about a flight I had where another plane seemed to be VERY close to mine and everyone here pretty much called me a liar and made off remarks pertaining to Top Gun and having a wingman. I hope they release the data so I can vindicate myself.
That won't help unless the data includes that specific flight. There is a big difference between intentional and unintentional proximity between aircraft.
birdstrike is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 7:01 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by NWstu

Isn't it more frightening that the AP has tried to get the info under the FOIA for the last 14 months and was rebuffed?
Yes, it is. Hopefully, the courts will get involved. Some people need to remember who they work for.

Last edited by whirledtraveler; Oct 22, 2007 at 7:20 pm
whirledtraveler is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 8:08 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 186
As a (small) airplane pilot I'm not to happy with this either. This sort of information can be used to enhance safety. Burying it will maintain the status quo.
Citabria is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 8:30 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
I wonder if this is tied to the ASRS in any way?
birdstrike is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 8:47 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Marriott Plat
Posts: 946
What FOIA exemption could this possibly fall under? Did they make one up?
amejr999 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 8:52 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by law dawg
I've said many times that there have been incidents that have not been released to the public because it might cause people to not fly.
Anything that improves the odds of my upgrade clearing is jake with me. ^ I'll get on that aircraft regardless.
birdstrike is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 11:54 pm
  #13  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Originally Posted by birdstrike
I wonder if this is tied to the ASRS in any way?
Originally Posted by amejr999
What FOIA exemption could this possibly fall under? Did they make one up?
Great questions. I'd love to know, too.

Here's one thought that the OP's link cleared up for me:
Although to most people NASA is associated with spaceflight, the agency has a long and storied history of aviation safety research. Its experts study atmospheric science and airplane materials and design, among other areas
I had no idea NASA's mission was still so close its -- or NACA's, actually -- original intent. ^
essxjay is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2007, 11:58 pm
  #14  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
'nuther curious tidbit:

NASA had begun to interview general aviation pilots and initially planned to interview flight attendants, air traffic controllers and mechanics before the survey was halted.
What an avalanche of data that would be.
essxjay is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2007, 7:26 am
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by birdstrike
I wonder if this is tied to the ASRS in any way?
Supposedly not. This was a separate study that was contracted out in which detailed questions were asked. ASRS is an entirely separate matter.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.