Death of a passenger on airliner
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Programs: "all" airlines and hotels
Posts: 94
Death of a passenger on airliner
This happened to me on a flight last week, and the airline seemed to handle it very strangely.
Trans-pacific flight.
3 hours from destination - a passenger started experiencing medical problems.
2 hours from destination - pilot announces we are diverting to "remove the body" :
1 hour from destination - we land, and it takes about 2 hours to go through the paperwork and stuff before we take off.
So, needless to say, I missed my connection and had to spend a night. I suspect a fair number of people missed, as 3 hour delay is really quite a lot.
So, why did we divert? I figure, 50/50 chance that the passenger lived in the destination city, so for the family, seems like it would have been a LOT better to continue.
Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this, knows the rules, whatever.
Trans-pacific flight.
3 hours from destination - a passenger started experiencing medical problems.
2 hours from destination - pilot announces we are diverting to "remove the body" :
1 hour from destination - we land, and it takes about 2 hours to go through the paperwork and stuff before we take off.
So, needless to say, I missed my connection and had to spend a night. I suspect a fair number of people missed, as 3 hour delay is really quite a lot.
So, why did we divert? I figure, 50/50 chance that the passenger lived in the destination city, so for the family, seems like it would have been a LOT better to continue.
Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this, knows the rules, whatever.
#3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: United 2P, Westpac Altitude, Qantas
Posts: 135
I have been present at numerous medical emergencies onboard the transpac but never a death. One was last year the person sitting next to my son. All the others they moved the person and the attending medical officer, but the last one they stayed put so I had to switch seats with my son who became upset about it all. We have never changed flight paths due to one of the emergencies. I have heard of deaths onboard where it was kept quiet and the body covered as if asleep with the plane continuing on. I guess in your case the pilot determined that travelling with the body may have caused extreme distress to other passesngers so he did what he could to minimize the psychological impact on them.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 13,344
What airline?
SQ has a body storage unit in many of their planes and an NZ FA I spoke to last month said they also have a spot to put the body, if on a longhaul, but there preference was to leave them in a seat in Premier Business. Unless very, very messy why divert?
SQ has a body storage unit in many of their planes and an NZ FA I spoke to last month said they also have a spot to put the body, if on a longhaul, but there preference was to leave them in a seat in Premier Business. Unless very, very messy why divert?
#5
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: BLI or CLT
Programs: The usual suspects
Posts: 1,899
As a physician, I always respond when the flight crew requests medical assistance for an inflight emergency. In many cases, the pilot has asked me if it is medically necessary to divert the flight and land short of the destination; only once in 20+ years have I actually had to recommend landing ASAP. So certainly this can be done, and is done.
On a transpac there may be no reasonable place to divert, and if the passenger is deceased, then there is no strict medical necessity. I've not been in that particular situation, but colleagues tell me that the deceased may be covered with a blanket as though sleeping, or moved to a more private location if possible (crew rest area, or empty row in back).
I can imagine there are many challenges and lots of paperwork regarding a passenger who dies enroute, especially in foreign airspace with the body being unloaded in a different country. Not to mention how other passengers might feel about the situation.
On a transpac there may be no reasonable place to divert, and if the passenger is deceased, then there is no strict medical necessity. I've not been in that particular situation, but colleagues tell me that the deceased may be covered with a blanket as though sleeping, or moved to a more private location if possible (crew rest area, or empty row in back).
I can imagine there are many challenges and lots of paperwork regarding a passenger who dies enroute, especially in foreign airspace with the body being unloaded in a different country. Not to mention how other passengers might feel about the situation.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 13,344
The FA on NZ that I spoke with about this indicated that the paperwork took between 2 and 3 hours to complete. In addition the crew could not go off duty until it was completed at the destination airport. She just said it was a bureaucratic nightmare.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Someone dies and people are worried about being inconvenienced by filling out paperwork? What does that say about work ethic and our society?
#9
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,662
As a physician, I always respond when the flight crew requests medical assistance for an inflight emergency. In many cases, the pilot has asked me if it is medically necessary to divert the flight and land short of the destination; only once in 20+ years have I actually had to recommend landing ASAP. So certainly this can be done, and is done.
#11
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SAN
Posts: 2,426
As a physician, I always respond when the flight crew requests medical assistance for an inflight emergency. In many cases, the pilot has asked me if it is medically necessary to divert the flight and land short of the destination; only once in 20+ years have I actually had to recommend landing ASAP. So certainly this can be done, and is done.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
I had someone seated directly behind me puke all over himself and the guy next to him. Not only was it a biohazard situation, but the FAs told me it was going to be a paperwork nightmare.
The way you say it, and the way the FAs told me (granted, it was nearly three years ago) about the vomiting....are you saying that vomit has more red tape on an aircraft than someone dying?
It doesn't make any sense.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
As a physician, I've helped out a few times as well. I've never seen anything serious enough to make the decision to divert obvious. I would never, however, take responsibility if I'm not 100% certain (i.e., always). When they ask, I've replied, "That's not a decision that I have been trained to make." They then radio an MD on the ground (who's job it is) who makes the call.
I've heard that of airlines having a doctor on the ground that makes decisions in situations like this.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Pointy End
Posts: 3,565
Nothing personal, but you're able to render medical assistance to someone, yet are not able to make a decision on her/his short-term prognosis? I know you don't have her/his full medical history, but your statement sounds awkward.
I've heard that of airlines having a doctor on the ground that makes decisions in situations like this.
I've heard that of airlines having a doctor on the ground that makes decisions in situations like this.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Are you sure?
I had someone seated directly behind me puke all over himself and the guy next to him. Not only was it a biohazard situation, but the FAs told me it was going to be a paperwork nightmare.
The way you say it, and the way the FAs told me (granted, it was nearly three years ago) about the vomiting....are you saying that vomit has more red tape on an aircraft than someone dying?
It doesn't make any sense.
I had someone seated directly behind me puke all over himself and the guy next to him. Not only was it a biohazard situation, but the FAs told me it was going to be a paperwork nightmare.
The way you say it, and the way the FAs told me (granted, it was nearly three years ago) about the vomiting....are you saying that vomit has more red tape on an aircraft than someone dying?
It doesn't make any sense.