Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Your right to fly without ID (proof at last)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2007, 11:14 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 115
Originally Posted by xyzzy
I suppose that you would have suggested that Rosa Parks start a letter writing campaign rather than refuse to give up her seat near the front of the bus and waste the time of the other passengers


She didn't take the time of the other passengers because she wouldn't show ID, it was because she wouldn't give up her seat just because she was black...SHEESH! How does that compare to showing your id at the airport? I know I'm blonde but I'm failing to see the similiarities in the two situations.
thenelsons is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2007, 11:44 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MIA
Programs: PC Plat/Amb
Posts: 1,152
Originally Posted by jonesing
According to the letter, a pax does not have the right to refuse using the ETP. I know some airports were asking people if they wanted to try it back when they were undergoing trials, but now that they are online, there's no asking.
It's all semantics.

You can't refuse the process, per se.

Imagine a small child who is afraid of the machine.

Not going through it would then constitute a refusal of sorts.

To deal with this, the alternate screening method would then be employed.

Thus you could choose "B" in lieu of "A" and still be in compliance with the policy.
We Will Never Forget is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 12:19 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: JAL, ANA
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by oneant
Will someone please help me understand what exactly the problem is with being required to show ID at the airport? I understand the absurdity of there being numerous holes in a system tasked with securing our "safety" in commercial aviation, but what would you gain if they stopped asking that ID's be shown?
Besides 15 seconds of your time? Plus the cumlative time of all those in front of you whose ID's were checked? I'm sure that adds up to quite a bit.

When both the TSA admits per another thread that no ID is required, and a valid US government employee ID is denied as being valid (one which requires background checks, fingerprints, financial records, neighbor interviews etc) one should question what exactly is being gained by presenting an ID?
hl78 is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 4:18 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
Originally Posted by aamilesslave
You're not going to get the rules changed by not showing ID at the airport; you're just making the screening process longer for the rest of us. Find a more productive way to show your disdain that might actually do some good.
Which rule is the OP asking to have changed in this thread? He is only asking that the TSA follows the rules it has put in place. Is it too much to ask a Government agency to follow its own rules?
ND Sol is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 5:17 am
  #50  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by thenelsons
Originally Posted by xyzzy
I suppose that you would have suggested that Rosa Parks start a letter writing campaign rather than refuse to give up her seat near the front of the bus and waste the time of the other passengers


She didn't take the time of the other passengers because she wouldn't show ID, it was because she wouldn't give up her seat just because she was black...SHEESH! How does that compare to showing your id at the airport? I know I'm blonde but I'm failing to see the similiarities in the two situations.
Don't you get it? Showing ID has NOTHING too do with security. Anyone can get a fake ID and the "document checkers" are not competent enough to find the vast majority of fake ID's. Not to mention that the courts have ruled that one does not need to show ID to travel domestically.

Can you have such narrow vision as to not see where this is heading if it's not stopped by individuals who have the wherewithal to protest the beginnings of "papers, please."
doober is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 8:45 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
The TSA is launching a new program to take over ID screening.

They're looking to make a big bust finding fake ID's.
No, just want to hand out more Eagle Eye awards.

The TSA did make a big bust of fake IDs, but not during the "ID check" - the genius had a whole bunch in his carry on. (HNL I think - can't find the item).
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 8:47 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by DevilDog438
Actually, chances are that he will be walked to the head of the line, or shuttled off to a line specific to secondary screening, and be done with his secondary while those that showed ID will still be snaking their way through the cattle herding ropes to get to the WTMD.
Shhhh ! ^
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 8:49 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by aamilesslave
...you're just making the screening process longer for the rest of us.
Ibid.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 8:59 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by doober
Don't you get it? Showing ID has NOTHING too do with security. Anyone can get a fake ID and the "document checkers" are not competent enough to find the vast majority of fake ID's. Not to mention that the courts have ruled that one does not need to show ID to travel domestically.

Can you have such narrow vision as to not see where this is heading if it's not stopped by individuals who have the wherewithal to protest the beginnings of "papers, please."
Already happening. Hotels, stores and all kinds of other places are routinely asking for "ID". America (and Canada I guess) has always, as far as I can remember, been ID-obsessed; other than showing my passport at borders nowhere else in the free world have I ever been asked for ID. Yes, you have to surrender your passport at some hotels when staying there, but nobody ever looks at it.

My main "disdain" is that despite the utter futility of expecting to discover a terrorist simply by a cursory ID examination, the government continues to use this very point as justification for ID checking. That is, at best woefully misguided and at worst, an outright falsehood. But that may not bother some of you...
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 9:22 am
  #55  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 551
when the tsa first started the ambiguous rule of only 3/4" shoes must come off, a lot of flyers tried to push the limit by enforcing their rights not to remove their shoes. The TSA then decided to avoid any more confrontations, all shoes must come off. I imagine something similar here. It appears to me if you refuse to show ID, they can insist on checking your wallet, then take your ID and copy down the information. How does anyone win the fight then?? ID theft???
icarius is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 9:30 am
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,385
Originally Posted by thenelsons
She didn't take the time of the other passengers because she wouldn't show ID, it was because she wouldn't give up her seat just because she was black...SHEESH! How does that compare to showing your id at the airport? I know I'm blonde but I'm failing to see the similiarities in the two situations.
Others have said it quite well several times above, but if you want it spelled out for you again, I will do so.

In the US we currently have a right to travel without being forced to show our ID/papers as proof that we can be where we are. Courts have upheld this. The TSA asking for ID and comparing it with the name on the boarding pass has nothing to do with the its stated function of keeping travel/transit safe. Just because I have an ID card does not mean that I do or do not have a weapon. The two things have nothing whatsoever to do with each other. Yet, they still ask for ID. Checking ID takes time but provides no added benefit to travelers. It does, however, serve as an official enforcement of the airlines' ticket non-transferability rules. Once you realize this maybe you'll protest the ID checkers rather than those who are pointing out the TSA's flawed logic.

Let's go one step farther. Suppose you still don't agree with me. You think, "I'm not a terrorist. I have nothing to hide. Okay, here's my ID." Where does this stop? What if they decide to start checking your ID when you cross state lines claiming that the check is to prevent parental abduction of children. That sounds like a worthy cause too -- and you're not planning on any abductions. What will you do when they conduct ID check sweeps of your neighborhood, "Just to keep things safe." Where does this end? It all started so innocently at the airport.

Remember, checking ID has NOTHING to do with whether someone has a weapon. TSA's stated goal is, "...Protect[ing] the Nation’s transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce." Checking ID certainly doesn't sound like it ensures freedom of movement.
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 9:30 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AA EXP, 1 MM, AC, HH Diamond, Marriott Silver, Hertz 5*
Posts: 4,010
Originally Posted by icarius
It appears to me if you refuse to show ID, they can insist on checking your wallet, then take your ID and copy down the information. How does anyone win the fight then?? ID theft???
Did you read the first post in this thread?
videomaker is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 9:52 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
You can't support a position using hypothetical exmaples that are not reality. Asking us how we feel about being randomly stopped and ID'd at state borders or just walking down the street has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with them checking my ID at the airport.

This is seriously a tempest in a teapot. Of all of the things our ludicrously fearful gov't has implemented, or tried to implement, after 9/11, y'all really think this one is THAT important?
oneant is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 9:58 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CLT
Posts: 7,249
The TSA officer had my ID in his hand for over a minute and addressed me by my full name (SC will not allow just a middle initial on a license). I had to make the comment "What are you doing, memorizing it?" to get my ID back.

Seriously, if you were plotting to blow up the airline, would you travel with your real name and ID? NO!

I hate these "nothing to hide" arguments. I have nothing to hide, but that doesn't mean that I need everyone in the world to know my full name and address.
gj83 is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2007, 10:11 am
  #60  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by xyzzy
Let's go one step farther. Suppose you still don't agree with me. You think, "I'm not a terrorist. I have nothing to hide. Okay, here's my ID." Where does this stop? What if they decide to start checking your ID when you cross state lines claiming that the check is to prevent parental abduction of children. That sounds like a worthy cause too -- and you're not planning on any abductions. What will you do when they conduct ID check sweeps of your neighborhood, "Just to keep things safe." Where does this end? It all started so innocently at the airport.
If one does resort to the "I've got nothing to hide" line, perhaps reading an essay by Daniel J. Solove, "Nothing to Hide" will change the reader's mind.
doober is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.