![]() |
Aussie Lingo Sparks Security Scare
http://www.theage.com.au/news/travel...s_cid=rss_news
Strewth. Crikey. Bloody hell. An Australian woman has reportedly sparked a security scare aboard a US flight after her use of a common Australian phrase was apparently misinterpreted as an act of aggression. Sophie Reynolds, 41, from Queanbeyan, was flying aboard SkyWest Airlines from Atlanta to Pittsburgh this week when she asked a flight attendant if she could have a pack of pretzels instead of crackers. "[The flight attendant] said they didn't have any [pretzels], and I said, 'Fair dinkum,' out of frustration," Reynolds was quoted as saying in the The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Before she knew it a second flight attendant asked her for her passport and copied down her name. Then, when the flight landed, three uniformed officers greeted her. "They said, 'You swore at the hostess and there are federal rules against that,"' Reynolds said. "And I said, 'I did not swear at the hostess, I just said 'fair dinkum."' |
Got to love the way the FAs fall back on "agressive behaviour" as an excuse. That's a great line to cover themselves.
Just because our guests from overseas do not behave the same way as people in this country do (TG) our guests are picked on yet again. Shame on the FAs. |
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
(Post 8207770)
I found that rather odd as well. I'm guessing soon they'll want badges. Or maybe they're just happy with their current quasi-arrest powers? Insult a flight attendant..........go to jail! "Thats cute, sweetheart........now go get me another Coke. Thanks!" |
Flight attendants on a power-trip? Never. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
(Post 8207770)
Flight Attendants can demand passports now? Nice to see in this case the passenger was not charged and was allowed to go on her way, but sheesh. |
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
(Post 8207770)
They said, 'You swore at the hostess and there are federal rules against that,"' Reynolds said.
|
Originally Posted by fairviewroad
(Post 8208996)
I mean, in this case, the passenger could have denied having a passport, since it's not a document that's needed on a domestic flight. But I'm sure the FA would have simply asked for a drivers license instead.
|
This is a nice demonstration of insanity.
Perhaps they should have a list of restricted words printed on the emergency card and shown on the safety video. In multiple languages of course. |
Crikey - that is really 'out there' :eek:
Ok I am an Aussie I dont generally walk around saying "crikey, fair dinkum and streth"! Regardless, at no time, ever in our country have these sayings been interpreted as swearing! Does the FA not watch TV, did she/he not see the Steve Irwin specials, these words are used constantly by Aussie icon, Steve (now gone). Maybe that FA needs a trip downunder to understand the lingo.......;) |
Originally Posted by Downunder girl
(Post 8209259)
Maybe that FA needs a trip downunder to understand the lingo.......;)
|
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
(Post 8207770)
I am trying to digest the significance of this event. Reflecting back on another similar event of a few weeks ago, I mean it is not as if she repeatedly said "bye bye plane", which is by any DHS standard, clearly a threat to the well being of the valuable equipment, crew and passengers. And why was the mother of the child asked to leave the plane as well, and not just the child? I don't recall reading anything attributing "agressive behavior" to the mother. Although she did reject the suggestion to use behavior modfying drugs on the child. But then when is it a potential crime to reject such an instruction? So what is the solution to such misunderstandings? Some thoughts to this end; 1) Require all passengers to have a high school diploma with a knowledge of and working familairty American English. Fortunately our president uses non-commercial aircraft and doesn't have to pass this litmus test. 2) Any use of slang, idioms, colloquialisms, or local dialects will constitute a breach of these requirements and immediate ejection from the aircraft (of course below pressurized altitude) 3) With restrictions on carry ons, liquids, gels, solids, electronics, shoes, lighters, use of some toilets, and apparently some forms of conversation which are percieved by the well trained linquists to be "aggressive behavior", why not just make it illegal for passengers to have any form of intercourse while on board an aircraft. For emergency purposes, each seat back can contain several cue cards which can be displayed to communicate with the flight crew under emergency circumstances. Of course what constitutes an "emergency" circumstance would have to be pre-determined. Just some thoughts! |
Originally Posted by cpx
(Post 8209046)
ID is not required for Travel in most states. They make you think it is.
|
I wonder what would happen if the FA asked what I wanted to drink and I answered: Oh yeah luv. Me throat`s as dry as dead dingos`s dongo so pop over a can of coke. And after that I guess I`ll be shaking hands with the unemployed. :rolleyes:
|
So should I have complained about the FA who uttered the word "cluster***k" and the phrase "same s**t, different day" in front of me last night? (I sympathized with him, last night's flight was a cluster***k.)
|
Bloody hell
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.