FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Hygiene: Can I request not to take my shoes off? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/718002-hygiene-can-i-request-not-take-my-shoes-off.html)

goalie Jul 26, 2007 11:16 am


Originally Posted by mikeef (Post 8123666)
I wore my shoes through and did not alarm the WTMD. They proceeded to do a full body patdown and did a bag search. No one was able to explain to me why they needed to do that if the only problem was my shoes.

Mike

they were flat out wrong :mad: and i would have told them that tsa policy is that if there is no alarm with shoes on, it is a swab and that's it. the patdown is fine as i run about 50/50 with it but they need to have cause to look in your bag-either SSSS or something showed up on the x-ray machine (and they are required to tell you what they are looking at/for).

mikeef Jul 26, 2007 1:19 pm


Originally Posted by goalie (Post 8123888)
they were flat out wrong :mad: and i would have told them that tsa policy is that if there is no alarm with shoes on, it is a swab and that's it. the patdown is fine as i run about 50/50 with it but they need to have cause to look in your bag-either SSSS or something showed up on the x-ray machine (and they are required to tell you what they are looking at/for).

That's what I thought. I've looked on the TSA website and couldn't find anything on this topic. Do we have an idea of where I could find the official policy on this?

Thanks!
Mike

doober Jul 26, 2007 2:42 pm


Originally Posted by goalie (Post 8123888)
they were flat out wrong :mad: and i would have told them that tsa policy is that if there is no alarm with shoes on, it is a swab and that's it. the patdown is fine as i run about 50/50 with it but they need to have cause to look in your bag-either SSSS or something showed up on the x-ray machine (and they are required to tell you what they are looking at/for).

Done under the guise of "continuous screening?"

Michelle2385 Jul 26, 2007 4:59 pm


Originally Posted by doober (Post 8122393)
Everybody with diabetes needs to refuse to remove their shoes. If that would happen, maybe the TSA would finally begin to get the message that it's unhealthy to be tramping over filthy floors sans shoes.

Excellent suggestion! Better yet, if everyone refused to go shoeless on a particular day, they'd really get the message. It could be called "National Shoe Day" or something like that. The TSA couldn't ground everybody for refusing to participate in their sick and disgusting ritual, which has absolutely nothing to do with security.

GeorgiaRebel Jul 27, 2007 3:20 pm


Originally Posted by Michelle2385 (Post 8126145)
Excellent suggestion! Better yet, if everyone refused to go shoeless on a particular day, they'd really get the message. It could be called "National Shoe Day" or something like that. The TSA couldn't ground everybody for refusing to participate in their sick and disgusting ritual, which has absolutely nothing to do with security.

Out of "an abundance of caution," Kippie would probably ground all aircraft on that day. :mad:

iluv2fly Jul 27, 2007 3:36 pm


Originally Posted by doober (Post 8125267)
Done under the guise of "continuous screening?"

This was exactly the excuse the supervisor gave me at MKE today when I was groped after not taking my shoes off and not setting off the magnetometer. :td:

And I told him what I thought of his "excuse"... :rolleyes:

Michelle2385 Jul 27, 2007 4:51 pm


Originally Posted by GeorgiaRebel (Post 8131178)
Out of "an abundance of caution," Kippie would probably ground all aircraft on that day. :mad:

Maybe he would. Of course, that would cause an enormous outpouring of protest from the airlines, not to mention the abundance of outrage from most pax. It would certainly help to make the public aware of just how useless and unsanitary the shoe carnival is.

visaman Jul 27, 2007 10:51 pm


Originally Posted by Michelle2385 (Post 8126145)
. The TSA couldn't ground everybody for refusing to participate in their sick and disgusting ritual, which has absolutely nothing to do with security.

Sick and disgusting? That's a wee bit harsh, eh? Considering what's happening in Afganastan, what you described is just a tip toe through the tulips. :p

PatrickHenry1775 Jul 27, 2007 11:11 pm


Originally Posted by visaman (Post 8132988)
Sick and disgusting? That's a wee bit harsh, eh? Considering what's happening in Afganastan, what you described is just a tip toe through the tulips. :p

The United States is a developed country. Here, people normally do not walk around in public buildings barefoot or in their stocking feet. As another poster mentioned, winter weather means sloppy conditions. Most airport restrooms have liquid of one sort or another on the floors, which liquid then gets tracked all over, including the floors at checkpoints. There is a reason why life expectancy has historically been lower in Afghanistan than it is here in the United States.

doober Jul 28, 2007 5:48 am


Originally Posted by Michelle2385 (Post 8126145)
Better yet, if everyone refused to go shoeless on a particular day, they'd really get the message. It could be called "National Shoe Day" or something like that. The TSA couldn't ground everybody for refusing to participate in their sick and disgusting ritual, which has absolutely nothing to do with security.

I think it's a great idea. Set a date 6 months in the future and start to organize a national day of civil disobedience at the airports.

USCGamecock Jul 28, 2007 7:08 am


Originally Posted by doober (Post 8133604)
I think it's a great idea. Set a date 6 months in the future and start to organize a national day of civil disobedience at the airports.

Great idea - but it will never happen.

Superguy Jul 28, 2007 8:48 am


Originally Posted by iluv2fly (Post 8131265)
This was exactly the excuse the supervisor gave me at MKE today when I was groped after not taking my shoes off and not setting off the magnetometer. :td:

And I told him what I thought of his "excuse"... :rolleyes:

Didn't think they'd even let you thru without taking your shoes off any more. At least what I had been hearing, secondary wasn't an option anymore. If it is, I'll be keeping my shoes on again.

I thought it was ridiculous my 2 year old son's sandals had to be removed. :td:

Daringdoo Jul 28, 2007 10:23 am


Originally Posted by PatrickHenry1775 (Post 8133028)
The United States is a developed country. Here, people normally do not walk around in public buildings barefoot or in their stocking feet. As another poster mentioned, winter weather means sloppy conditions. Most airport restrooms have liquid of one sort or another on the floors, which liquid then gets tracked all over, including the floors at checkpoints. There is a reason why life expectancy has historically been lower in Afghanistan than it is here in the United States.

I agree that this is a highly disgusting behaviour we're being demanded to follow. So, my question is: Why doesn't the Health Department get involved?? Certainly people from there also travel and have to go through the shoe carnival - how can they not see what we see and do something about it?

DD

eoinnz Jul 28, 2007 11:29 am


Originally Posted by Daringdoo (Post 8134397)
I agree that this is a highly disgusting behaviour we're being demanded to follow. So, my question is: Why doesn't the Health Department get involved?? Certainly people from there also travel and have to go through the shoe carnival - how can they not see what we see and do something about it?

DD


Originally Posted by Michelle2385 (Post 8131580)
It would certainly help to make the public aware of just how useless and unsanitary the shoe carnival is.

I think a short walk with shoes off is hardly going to be a health risk (for those without a medical condition) even less of a risk if your wearing socks.

I would say about 99% of passengers who take their shoes off on board don't put them back on before going to the toilet - there is your health risk.

I see it all the time and the only good thing to come out of that is I don't need to mop the toilet floors since all the passengers socks are doing it for me! (of course I still clean the floor - just making a point)

Taking your shoes off for 5 seconds should be the least of your worries. If your putting a plastic cover over your feet, make sure you put one on your seat, on the plane floor, on the... actually would someone invent a plane condom - that way we can all be safe!

Daringdoo Jul 28, 2007 11:54 am


Originally Posted by eoinnz (Post 8134650)
I think a short walk with shoes off is hardly going to be a health risk (for those without a medical condition) even less of a risk if your wearing socks.

I would say about 99% of passengers who take their shoes off on board don't put them back on before going to the toilet - there is your health risk.

I see it all the time and the only good thing to come out of that is I don't need to mop the toilet floors since all the passengers socks are doing it for me! (of course I still clean the floor - just making a point)

Taking your shoes off for 5 seconds should be the least of your worries. If your putting a plastic cover over your feet, make sure you put one on your seat, on the plane floor, on the... actually would someone invent a plane condom - that way we can all be safe!


I find it a truely disgusting process. And then we get to put our feet back in our shoes. I don't even walk around my own home (or any other) without slippers on my feet.

As for pax going to the lav in stocking feet... Eeeeewwww! Some people weren't brought up - they were dragged! :D Actually, if that is their choice, who am I to judge? It's what I choose for myself and what I am being obliged to do to which I am objecting.

DD


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:10 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.