FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Since when are mL's a unit of weight? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/669971-since-when-mls-unit-weight.html)

exerda Mar 11, 2007 4:36 pm

Since when are mL's a unit of weight?
 
I ran by a CVS today to pick up some shaving gel, as the stuff I had at home was too large to pass the Kip's Zip muster.

I noticed one brand--Gilette, I believe--that came in a fairly small can. It was labeled "NET WEIGHT: 100mL / 3.4 oz."

I almost laughed out loud in the store. First, this is the WORST example I've ever seen of confusing weight and volumetric measurements; usually, the confusion is on the oz / fl oz end of things, not the mL end! Second, it's uber-convenient, it would seem, that the "weights" match the current TSA guidelines.

I also noticed that my normal travel shave gel, in the exact same size can I already have but which says "Net weight: 5.6 oz" or something like that (which is why I left it at home!) now says, "Net weight: 3.4 oz"

Seems like people are manufacturers are doing all they can to capitalize on Kip's Folly.

whirledtraveler Mar 11, 2007 5:59 pm

All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

rar indeed Mar 11, 2007 9:34 pm

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)

Duh. 1 mL of H2 has the same mass as 1 mL of iron filings.

carpboy Mar 11, 2007 10:29 pm


Originally Posted by rar indeed (Post 7385393)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)

Duh. 1 mL of H2 has the same mass as 1 mL of iron filings.

That would be volume, duh.

rar indeed Mar 11, 2007 11:11 pm

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)


Originally Posted by carpboy

Originally Posted by rar indeed (Post 7385393)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)

Duh. 1 mL of H2 has the same mass as 1 mL of iron filings.

That would be volume, duh.

;)

redbeard911 Mar 12, 2007 7:26 am


Originally Posted by whirledtraveler (Post 7384291)
All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

"Go away! I'm batin'"

Yaatri Mar 12, 2007 9:15 am


Originally Posted by rar indeed (Post 7385393)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)

Duh. 1 mL of H2 has the same mass as 1 mL of iron filings.


Originally Posted by carpboy (Post 7385634)
That would be volume, duh.

Mass of 1 ml of H2 depends on the pressure. Volume of a gas, such as H2 is not a meaningful quantity unless pressure and temperature are also given.

mwarden Mar 12, 2007 12:14 pm


Originally Posted by Yaatri (Post 7387375)
Mass of 1 ml of H2 depends on the pressure. Volume of a gas, such as H2 is not a meaningful quantity unless pressure and temperature are also given.

You only need to know density. Pressure and temperature have influence over density, but the measurement needed is density.

thezipper Mar 12, 2007 3:26 pm

which weighs more... a ton of feathrs or a ton of bowling balls ;) ask your favorite TSA agent that...

Yaatri Mar 12, 2007 3:28 pm


Originally Posted by mwarden (Post 7388518)
You only need to know density. Pressure and temperature have influence over density, but the measurement needed is density.

Correct, but do you know densities of agses at various pressures and temperatures?:D

Sanosuke Mar 12, 2007 3:32 pm

I'm surprised in all this discussion nobody thought about using grams as a unit of weight, thusly -- milligrams or mg.

Sanosuke!

osxanalyst Mar 12, 2007 3:34 pm

OP has a good point. For water at atmospheric pressure 1 mL = 1 gram, but mL is never a measurement of weight.

Yaatri Mar 12, 2007 3:39 pm


Originally Posted by osxanalyst (Post 7389739)
OP has a good point. For water at atmospheric pressure 1 mL = 1 gram, but mL is never a measurement of weight.

Strictly speaking, neither are Kg, g or mg.

Meho79 Mar 12, 2007 3:42 pm

Although technically, grams are a unit of mass. Newtons are the unit of force. ^

The imperial units of mass are either the slug or lbm (pounds mass).

tlr Mar 12, 2007 3:55 pm


Originally Posted by exerda (Post 7383876)
I also noticed that my normal travel shave gel, in the exact same size can I already have but which says "Net weight: 5.6 oz" or something like that (which is why I left it at home!) now says, "Net weight: 3.4 oz"

Presumably, that's so even the most stupid liquid barker can tell. Like the guy at JFK who told people to throw away their liquids because they weren't labelled, so he "couldn't see what they weigh."

No, I'm not making this up.

wb8iny Mar 12, 2007 3:56 pm


Originally Posted by whirledtraveler (Post 7384291)
All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

After checking out the flick on imdb, I decided to take a look..... My kind of video. I'm #179 on the reserve list at our local library, who owns about 12 copies.... It must have a cult following, I had never heard of it before, and it certainly hasn't shown up on any of my trans-atlantic/pacific United flights as an option :p .

BTW, yes, grams/pounds are mass, not weight.... Weight needs to factor in the force of gravity.

FliesWay2Much Mar 12, 2007 7:14 pm

Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.

Travellin' Fool Mar 12, 2007 7:32 pm

[QUOTE=wb8iny;7389868] I'm #179 on the reserve list at our local library, who owns about 12 copies.... QUOTE]

Blockbuster? Hollywood video? Cable MoD?

frink Mar 12, 2007 9:12 pm


Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 7390978)
I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.

Anvils aren't liquid. :)

Though I do wish mercury were easier to obtain in quantity. ;)

Superguy Mar 12, 2007 9:21 pm


Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 7390978)
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.

1 cc of water = 1g, not 1 mg.

Skillet Mar 12, 2007 9:31 pm


Originally Posted by whirledtraveler (Post 7384291)
All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

Strange place to find out Mike Judge made a 'new' film. But then again, I think it was 2002 before I found Office Space.

Thanks for the link, although I'm almost afraid to watch it for fear of massive depression.

osxanalyst Mar 13, 2007 5:56 am


Originally Posted by Yaatri (Post 7389776)
Strictly speaking, neither are Kg, g or mg.

True. But here on earth, the difference is semantic.

Flaflyer Mar 13, 2007 7:14 am

Clean Up at Security Aisle 3
 

Originally Posted by tlr (Post 7389861)
Like the guy at JFK who told people to throw away their liquids because they weren't labelled, so he "couldn't see what they weigh."

What happens when a pax takes a 1 oz hotel shampoo bottle, relabels it "Contents: 5000 US Gallons", and hands it to the JFK dude above in an Approved Kwart Kip Zip? :D

Yaatri Mar 13, 2007 7:25 am


Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 7390978)
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.

Sorry, I beg to differ with you. You are of b a factor of a thousand. You probably meant that 1cc of water has a mass of 1 gram.

jib71 Mar 13, 2007 7:27 am


Originally Posted by Flaflyer (Post 7393295)
What happens when a pax takes a 1 oz hotel shampoo bottle, relabels it "Contents: 5000 US Gallons", and hands it to the JFK dude above in an Approved Kwart Kip Zip? :D

I bet that the aforementioned dude would confiscate the shampoo bottle because ... how is he supposed to know if 5000 US gallons is less or more than 100ml?

I'm also willing to bet that you could re-label all of your shampoo mini-bottles with words to the effect of "Contents: 99ml liquid sarin" and walk straight past 99% of airport security dudes without any questions. (But be ready for a shower of bullets coming your way when you meet the exception to this rule).

:) - just so you know that this is intended as humour.

FliesWay2Much Mar 13, 2007 9:47 am

[QUOTE] Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much View Post
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.[
/QUOTE]

My bad -- I typed too fast last night. It's 1 gram of weight -- not 1mg

osxanalyst Mar 13, 2007 10:40 am

[QUOTE=FliesWay2Much;7394099]

Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much View Post
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.[
/QUOTE]

My bad -- I typed too fast last night. It's 1 gram of weight -- not 1mg
As I was corrected by Yaatri, its 1 gram of mass. But as I posted earlier, the difference between mass and weight on earth (near sea-level) is semantic.

hondsps Mar 13, 2007 10:49 am

this is madness!!

carpboy Mar 14, 2007 7:57 am

[QUOTE=osxanalyst;7394418]

Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 7394099)

As I was corrected by Yaatri, its 1 gram of mass. But as I posted earlier, the difference between mass and weight on earth (near sea-level) is semantic.

No it's not - it is quite important. It is just our everyday life experience is 9.8 m/sec^2 and that is only at sea level and also where all the mass/weight conversions are supposedly done.

And for the the mass of mL record, 1 g at 4 degrees C. Water is unique in that its density is a maximum instead of more or less linear function as most other compounds.

osxanalyst Mar 14, 2007 8:03 am

[QUOTE=carpboy;7400326]

Originally Posted by osxanalyst (Post 7394418)

No it's not - it is quite important. It is just our everyday life experience is 9.8 m/sec^2 and that is only at sea level and also where all the mass/weight conversions are supposedly done.

And for the the mass of mL record, 1 g at 4 degrees C. Water is unique in that its density is a maximum instead of more or less linear function as most other compounds.

Like I said, semantic. My undergrad degree was in Mech Engineering with a focus on fluid mechanics, so I know all the scientific nuances. But for the everyday person the distinction between the two is irrelevant.

FliesWay2Much Mar 14, 2007 9:08 am

[QUOTE=osxanalyst;7400351]

Originally Posted by carpboy (Post 7400326)

Like I said, semantic. My undergrad degree was in Mech Engineering with a focus on fluid mechanics, so I know all the scientific nuances. But for the everyday person the distinction between the two is irrelevant.

I knew there were some other constraints (like a fixed temperature and pressure) but couldn't remember them from Freshman Chemistry -- that was a long time ago!

secretsea18 Mar 14, 2007 8:23 pm

All Based on water ... H2O

1 gram H2O = 1 ml H2O = 1 cubic centimeter H2O

Weight, volume and dimensions of other substances are not equal. Only for water.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:22 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.