Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

What is the news value of an idiotic security quote ?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What is the news value of an idiotic security quote ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007, 4:24 pm
  #1  
Original Member
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Programs: AA (Life Plat), Marriott (Life Titanium) and every other US program
Posts: 6,411
What is the news value of an idiotic security quote ?

There was a news story (one of many) discussing the new requirement that you must have a passport to re-enter the US from Mexico, Canada and the Carribean.

As usual, they mananged to find an idiotic quote: "I'd rather be going through a security check, than possibly being blown out of the air because of lack of security measures," said John Golden of Columbus, Ga., who was headed to Cancun, Mexico.

NOTE TO UNDERSTAND MY COMPLAINT: While the airline might request the passport to confirm you have the necessary travel documents, the real "check" of the passport is done when you get off the return airplane trip. So it has *nothing* to do with being "blown out of the air."

What is the news value of this idiotic quote?
sbrower is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 4:52 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by sbrower
....being blown out of the air....
That's all the news directors saw, and ran it. It doesn't necessarily have to be factual.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 5:39 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: YOW
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 968
Maybe this is where I can get an answer to a question raised in one of the US papers this morning or yesterday. They were saying that thousands of Canadian 'snowbirds' were in the US and they may have trouble returning if they forgot to take their passports with them when they flew down in the fall, since they won't be able to return home without them.

Does that mean Canada requires a passport for all incoming Canadians or does it mean the US requires a passport for anyone to fly out of their country? Or does it mean the journalist writing the article was too stupid to realize that if Canadians are returning to Canada, the US passport rules wouldn't apply.

Makes no mind to me, I have my passport with me right now, but won't know until Saturday if I need it to return to Canada.
KathrynInCanada is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 5:56 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,223
Originally Posted by KathrynInCanada
does it mean the US requires a passport for anyone to fly out of their country? Or does it mean the journalist writing the article was too stupid to realize that if Canadians are returning to Canada, the US passport rules wouldn't apply.
There is a reprieve in effect indefinitely for Canadians. But the law does say you need a passport to leave the U.S. and it would be checked before boarding your flight. Yes, the U.S. passport rules apply to Canadians. The reprieve is for Canadians who got here before the law went into effect.
Bobster is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 8:05 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Washington DC USA
Posts: 2,571
Originally Posted by Bobster
the law does say you need a passport to leave the U.S. and it would be checked before boarding your flight.
I can already see the hilarity that will ensue when this function is turned over to the rules-are-rules TSA folks and the ICE, and you'll get circumstances like someone arriving in the US without a passport, and being summarily deported for it, but the TSA won't let them board their return flight because they don't have a passport
crhptic is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 8:12 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by KathrynInCanada
Does that mean Canada requires a passport for all incoming Canadians or does it mean the US requires a passport for anyone to fly out of their country? Or does it mean the journalist writing the article was too stupid to realize that if Canadians are returning to Canada, the US passport rules wouldn't apply.
The new rules this week affect only the process of entering the US. The "old" way is still good going into Canada.

Driving or ferrying into the US is still okay to be passport-free until 1.1.08, because the terrorists said they won't try to enter until then.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 8:21 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,223
If they won't let you board a flight to Canada, you can fly to Buffalo, cross the border by ground transporatation, and then fly from Toronto to anywhere in Canada. Passports are only needed for air travel, so there's a big hole at this point.

Originally Posted by LessO2
The new rules this week affect only the process of entering the US. The "old" way is still good going into Canada.
The new rules affect people who are leaving also. But they made an exception for Canadians returning home. But Canadians leaving the U.S. for Mexico would not be allowed to go without a passport; they have to go home and then fly from Canada to Mexico.
Bobster is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 8:21 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,449
Originally Posted by sbrower
There was a news story (one of many) discussing the new requirement that you must have a passport to re-enter the US from Mexico, Canada and the Carribean.

As usual, they mananged to find an idiotic quote: "I'd rather be going through a security check, than possibly being blown out of the air because of lack of security measures," said John Golden of Columbus, Ga., who was headed to Cancun, Mexico.

NOTE TO UNDERSTAND MY COMPLAINT: While the airline might request the passport to confirm you have the necessary travel documents, the real "check" of the passport is done when you get off the return airplane trip. So it has *nothing* to do with being "blown out of the air."

What is the news value of this idiotic quote?
I can only guess that stupid comments from stupid people have some curious appeal to other stupid people/viewers/readers/listeners to whom editors are hoping to appeal. Bah.
Telfes is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2007, 10:40 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 318
OK...here's a story from someone inside "the media". For about a month now I've been trying to get through to any script-writer that the current passport requirements only apply to AIR TRAVEL. I'm blue in the face from the endless conversations and corrections that travel other than air travel does not need a passport. Still, I can't work 24 hours a day and some idiot writes a script saying that ALL travel to Canada, the Caribbean and Mexico needs a passport.

Some of the people in "the media" are real doorknobs. I've been in the business for twenty years, does anybody have an opening in any other industry? Anything at all????
FinsUp99 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2007, 11:36 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: BKK, MKE
Programs: DL DM,Marriott Plat
Posts: 241
Originally Posted by FinsUp99
... does anybody have an opening in any other industry? Anything at all????
As they say, be careful what you wish for. TSA is hiring.
dw8146 is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2007, 9:44 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 318
Originally Posted by dw8146
As they say, be careful what you wish for. TSA is hiring.
That's hilarious because I know one broadcast engineer who quit/forced to retire and got hired by the TSA.

I'm still laughing on this.
FinsUp99 is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2007, 2:47 pm
  #12  
Used to be mmsteidl
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LUX
Programs: AA PLAT for life, AF Gold, Marriott Platinum, IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 400
Originally Posted by LessO2
Driving or ferrying into the US is still okay to be passport-free until 1.1.08, because the terrorists said they won't try to enter until then.
And they usually don't get passports...
Pfaelzer is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2007, 2:52 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Omaha
Programs: UA/*A nobody, Bonvoy Plat, SW A-list, Hertz 5* (but who isn't???)
Posts: 677
Originally Posted by crhptic
I can already see the hilarity that will ensue when this function is turned over to the rules-are-rules TSA folks and the ICE, and you'll get circumstances like someone arriving in the US without a passport, and being summarily deported for it, but the TSA won't let them board their return flight because they don't have a passport
Can you say Viktor Navorski?
omahajim is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2007, 4:13 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ORF
Programs: DL Silver
Posts: 249
Originally Posted by LessO2
Driving or ferrying into the US is still okay to be passport-free until 1.1.08, because the terrorists said they won't try to enter until then.
This made me laugh out loud.

It's rules like this that convince me that post 9/11 security rules are only for a calming effect of fearful travelers. The most they'll ever do is stop a lazy, copycat terrorist.
timothyp_787 is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2007, 11:40 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Minnesota
Programs: DL, Starwood, SWA, United. RIP NWA.
Posts: 318
Sometimes the news value is simply letting us all know how many stupid people are in the world. If the news didn't cover the uninformed doing the ill-advised, there wouldn't be much news, now would there?
Business as usual is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.