![]() |
TSA to allow advertising at checkpoints
http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/ch...s/ADS01047.xml
On another list, someone quipped that this is the real reason for the long security lines. That aside, I thought perhaps the most interesting part of this was the glimpse at the bureaucratic technical jargon that has now emerged for mundane airport security paraphernalia. Those trays are apparently called "divestiture bins", from which we can retrieve our stuff while at the "composure tables". I don't usually feel very composed after going through a long security line, so this will be an improvement. Maybe at least they'll make the divestiture tables the same height as the xray machines if this happens. |
While I'm sure there would be counter arguments about 'distracting pax from security' and that in some cases airport operators might not be subject to this sort of requirement (I think both claims would be wrong)... the TSA can't legally discriminate in their selection of ads based on content under existing first amendment law.
This would be a wonderful opportunity for some anti-TSA ads... |
Originally Posted by gleff
(Post 6962651)
[...]the TSA can't legally discriminate in their selection of ads based on content under existing first amendment law.
This would be a wonderful opportunity for some anti-TSA ads... |
... is wrong with us? Have we succumbed to the mindless advertising on TV that now we have to have ads in the gray bins we place our stuff in?
I can't wait to see the first as for SHAMPOO in a divestiture bin but only in a bottle of 3 oz or less. We are a F#*KED up nation if we allow this crap to continue to happen. STOP PLAYING US FOR FOOLS !! |
I'm very tempted to purchase some advertising for Argenbright. ;)
|
Maybe we should take out an ad that says "Kip Hawley is an idiot."
|
OR better yet...wonder how long its gonna be until TSA starts wearing Nike branded jackets
|
Originally Posted by gleff
(Post 6962651)
While I'm sure there would be counter arguments about 'distracting pax from security' and that in some cases airport operators might not be subject to this sort of requirement (I think both claims would be wrong)... the TSA can't legally discriminate in their selection of ads based on content under existing first amendment law.
This would be a wonderful opportunity for some anti-TSA ads... Actually Halliburton has first dibbs on the advertising space. ( that was just a joke ... :D ) lol This really is sad though. |
Originally Posted by jwillett13
(Post 6963647)
OR better yet...wonder how long its gonna be until TSA starts wearing Nike branded jackets
|
I wonder who will be the maker that advertises that they are the official TSA choice for Freedom Baggies?
|
Originally Posted by trvlr64
(Post 6962939)
...We are a F#*KED up nation if we allow this crap to continue to happen. STOP PLAYING US FOR FOOLS !!
Bruce |
Originally Posted by bdschobel
(Post 6965361)
Nobody is "playing us for fools." The fact of the matter is that we have become a nation of cowards and idiots. The TSA merely plans to recognize this fact.
Bruce They work for "US" and "WE" let them f@#$k us more and more. When is it enough? |
it was only a matter of time...
|
Originally Posted by jwillett13
(Post 6963624)
Maybe we should take out an ad that says "Kip Hawley is an idiot."
since its TSA.. do we get a discount?? |
I can see it now:
Zip-Loc: TSA's favorite baggie! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.